ACCforum: Tish - Viewing Profile - ACCforum

Jump to content

User Rating: -----

Active Posts:
39 (0.03 per day)
Most Active In:
New Topics (17 posts)
23-September 15
Profile Views:
Last Active:
User is offline Private

My Information

Member Title:
Age Unknown
Birthday Unknown
Not Telling Not Telling

Contact Information

Click here to e-mail me

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: Active plus

    09 March 2019 - 09:26 PM

    This her? http://www.psycholog...gister?pid=3441

    Practitioners Name THAKUR, Mrs Sangita
    Qualifications Bachelor of Arts Psychology, University of Poona, India, 26/11/1990
    Master of Arts Psychology, University of Poona, India, 18/11/1992
    Date of Registration 10 November 2006
    Status Registered, current practising certificate
    Scopes of Practice Psychologist
    Conditions on Scope of Practice Nil
  2. In Topic: Total Declinature Of Claim / Alan Thomas

    29 April 2018 - 09:14 PM

    View PostAlan Thomas, on 28 April 2018 - 03:54 PM, said:

    Keep in mind that evil prevails when good men do nothing. It seems to me that in your ignorance and arrogance you are promoting people do nothing despite the fact that the site has been set up so as when claimants are falsely accused or have their entitlements taken away from them despite the medical evidence they may seek not only comfort and care but also technical help.

    Are you with us or against us?

    I'm against this culture of rampant character assassination, veiled threats, repetitious nonsense that can never achieve any purpose and endless whining.

    As for your "evil prevails when good men do nothing" nonsense, the site denies access to "good men" who might like to do a great deal, but with the access you have all you seem to have achieved in decades of battling ACC is waste a huge amount of taxpayer resources paying for your endless, useless bitching at the system. If you really HAD any case, of all the people here you are the one who would have already proven it. You haven't. Whatever you have is not enough, you know it, everyone who has read your case law files knows it.

    Stop treating all these people, who have all attempted to explain their own actions ad nauseum, be they good or bad from whatever perspective they contribute from as a continuing source of your own personal vitriolic focus and grow the fuck up and either find some real evidence to win your case or stop haranguing everyone in every thread you post in. It doesn't matter who said what, when or where in what form and what they might have retained or deleted or changed in all the years you have been doing this. It doesn;t matter whether it was right or wrong, overt, covert, or legal. It's all been done. Your case is what it is, on its own merits and there is obviously not a damned thing you can do to change it, or you would have already.
  3. In Topic: Total Declinature Of Claim / Alan Thomas

    28 April 2018 - 02:48 PM

    View PostMINI, on 28 April 2018 - 02:30 PM, said:


    What the hell are you talking about, you creepy individual.?


    That's the sort of shit that he should be banned from here for. God knows why any of you continue to respond to his posts, let him rot in his pile of garbage and just ignore his little reality, leave him treading water in his pond of impotence. 🚫
  4. In Topic: Remove Alan Thomas as a Member fron

    10 April 2018 - 01:36 PM

    I've read enough posts, links and enough of your case law to think you are probably a control freak who doesn't appear to deal well with being confronted with a truth other than your own. It would appear others, with far more experience of your tactics and in roles of an authority you don't have, feel the same.

    It's still not all about you, you just want to make it so. Playing the victim card with regard to posts from others on this board really doesn't help change that.

    As I said, I don't believe you need to be kicked off, which is what this thread is about, but it's abundantly clear why others do.
  5. In Topic: Remove Alan Thomas as a Member fron

    10 April 2018 - 01:04 PM

    I am perfectly aware of the huge help you have provided people, and your feelings of offence are your choice so own it. I have acknowledged your assistance when you have answered a specific question I have asked in these forums. Others have done the same.

    I am not grateful for the continued overbearing attempts at ownership of the postings here by repeatedly posting a book to answer a sentence, and repeating the same shit over and over again. You have too much time on your hands, so why not apply it to sorting out this mess you have found yourself in because the oversupply of, often contradictory, information isn't helping anyone here. We've all read it over and over again and I don't think I'm the only reader here that just zones out and scrolls past the posts you continually make about your own cases whilst looking for something meaningful to read.

    I advised a gentlemen to come here and research his own specific historic toxicity issues, and I warned him to focus on the real content and avoid the asholery of those repeatedly grinding the same axe that happens in here all the time, but he is very unwell and likely will struggle to get past the shit and I am concerned that this wonderful repository of information and assistance has become your own toilet bowl to be played in by those who just can't help engage with the nonsense one more time. Why not set up your own forum and invite those who give a crap to splash about in there and leave this for people serious about taking on ACC and finding tools to help them win.

    Be offended if you want, that's your choice, but even my kids understand the world isn't all about them, so how did you miss it at your advanced age?

    I don't believe you should be kicked off, I do believe you need to make your own place to go to beat your chest.


Tish hasn't added any friends yet.


Page 1 of 1
  1. Photo


    12 Nov 2018 - 21:00
    Hi Mimi, just a quick catch up
    We won in Court at Appeal, Review was quashed by the Judge, ACC Toxicology Panel were described as dogmatic and unconstructive and the claim was sent back to ACC sent back to retest son's case against one small part of the Act, and only that.
    Apparently claim has to go back to the same Tox panel that just got their arses kicked for that ...
  2. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:45
    because right now, anyone can read most of the site, they just can't post and from that reading they can cause whatever trouble they want if personal info is readily available. Why would I want anyone to know who I really am when that info in the wrong hands could potentially cost ME my case? I only know who you are because people keep reposting it, and now I've read your case. See wha...
  3. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:42
    This site gets so many hits in google searches by people with ACC issues, of course people will want to sign up, but someone is blocking those new, perfectly legitimate people.
    I understand wanting to know who people are and vet them before allowing them access to post on the site, but look at it from the other side - why should people entrust their real identity to anyone who drops...
  4. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:39
    The names afre often too relevant, like "AucklandAdvocates" and "psychosomatic" and "AccInducedHeadache" as well as loads or ordinary type user names you'd find anywhere. Someone has chosen to label them bots and that may be based on their incoming IP address, but then my second account I attempted to test the validation theories on has also not been val...
  5. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:35
    No, someone active on the site is deliberately only allowing the occasional new sign up. There were a couple in the middle of last year got through and commented on the forums, yet hundreds (and I do mean hundreds) before and after them do not have a validated user account and without one cannot participate or ask for help. I do not believe even the majority are attempted bot registrations.
  6. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:26
    You welcome . Glad to hear you are couping out there. I read your interesting reasoning of the locked registration to enable newbies to get in here for advise etc. obiviously you are up on your IT. Maybe it is the police who have locked the gate to registration. They have a interest in this site. I hope it is that will mean the johnny Manu issue will go no further they will just close foru...
  7. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 14:01
    Hi Mini, no not me with a treatment injury, just ACC tried to cite case law about a treatment injury case as relevant to a WRGPI case, and have had contact with a claimant also for WRGPI to do with lead poisoning. Thanks for thinking of me though :-)
  8. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 13:58
    Tish I have a case for you if you are the one with the 'Treament Injury'. I found it useful because it use section 32 and section 33. Please PM me if you want to know its name and get hold of it.
Page 1 of 1