ACCforum: Tish - Viewing Profile - ACCforum

Jump to content

User Rating: -----

Active Posts:
62 (0.04 per day)
Most Active In:
New Topics (37 posts)
23-September 15
Profile Views:
Last Active:
User is offline Private

My Information

Member Title:
Advanced Member
Age Unknown
Birthday Unknown
Not Telling Not Telling

Contact Information

Click here to e-mail me

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: DR GIL NEWBURN

    30 May 2020 - 01:02 PM

    ACC dislike Gil for bailing out and going back to his medical roots where caring for his patients mattered, not throwing them under the ACC bus. ACC will argue with Gil's reports, they will rebutt Gil's reports, they will repeatedly fall flat on their face in Court because of Gil's reports and they will currently pay $110 towards consultation costs with Gil.

    Kritzinger in his ACC hatchet man job has major issues with the Truth, you would avoid him slightly more than you would the plague. He should have been a novelist.
  2. In Topic: Assisted Recovery team emails

    28 November 2019 - 07:43 PM

     tommy, on 28 November 2019 - 07:00 PM, said:

    BTW is your claim longstanding ……………..towards the corporation as in such matters :rolleyes:/>/>/>and such what act do you become under

     tommy, on 28 November 2019 - 07:21 PM, said:

    nothing has changed ,tish as in the corporation , creating new departments ,,,ie LTCU etc ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, the point you are making is how correspondence is appropriate to both parties ,,,,,,,,,, :rolleyes:/>/>

    The claim is a Schedule 2 and not particularly long standing, only as of late 2014, it just took a until this year for them to come to heel.

    The issue of missing emails is potentially relevant to anyone dealing with an internal department at ACC, in our case it is the assisted recovery team who have described their team as new, but every claimant should make sure their emails are followed up as appropriate. ACC love a loop hole to slither through any chance they get and if they can show they sent it, they won't care down the track whether a claimant got it or not.
  3. In Topic: Assisted Recovery team emails

    28 November 2019 - 06:07 PM

    Alan, ACC do all sorts of things in all sorts of ways as part of their internal claim processes with ongoing accepted claims.

    Currently they choose to turn ongoing accepted claims over to their Assisted Recovery team. That's because that's how ACC chooses to manage an onging claimant, just as they would with a case manager or any other person performing a role within their little empire.

    It's not about what they can, should or would do, it just is. They don't need any "legal basis" to utilise their staff in the way they choose to manage an ongoing claimamt.

    My post was nothing more or less than exactly what it appeared to be - to help make those with an accepted claim under ACC who may have management of the focus their claim shifted from their case worker to a team aware of this gmail account email problem and perhaps avoid issues later on if they have missed important communicatione because ACC allows THIS team to have an ongoing issue with how their internal ACC emails are processed by gmail servers when being received.

    Maybe you don't have an accepted claim for it to be an issue, but we do and others might too, if not now then later on down the line as they roll them over.
  4. In Topic: IRD and backdated ERC payout

    01 November 2019 - 05:51 PM


    The tax issue is in the hands of an accountant for a full financial assessement covering the entire period of incapacity for the potential serious service failure request next year.

    As to the The Interest on the full back payment sum, the case manager applied (without prompting)for ACC to assess the claim for interest payable which was accepted and the Interest has been paid out. Minus the top rate tax of course :lol: but the accountant will deal with that in whatever manner is appropriate as well.
  5. In Topic: acc moraly bankcrupt

    22 October 2019 - 08:07 PM

    Monigatti sits very high on my shit list and garnered himself 3 Statements of Correction to live inside ACC files in perpetuity outlining every lie and fabrication, misuse of information and documents, misrepresentation of documentation and failure to perform due diligence and insist on every document relevant to a case be provided and the claim fully investigated before performing his bogus pretence of doing his job. A dirty dog bought and ridden by ACC.

    That's the clean version of my opinion.


Tish hasn't added any friends yet.


Page 1 of 1
  1. Photo


    12 Nov 2018 - 21:00
    Hi Mimi, just a quick catch up
    We won in Court at Appeal, Review was quashed by the Judge, ACC Toxicology Panel were described as dogmatic and unconstructive and the claim was sent back to ACC sent back to retest son's case against one small part of the Act, and only that.
    Apparently claim has to go back to the same Tox panel that just got their arses kicked for that ...
  2. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:45
    because right now, anyone can read most of the site, they just can't post and from that reading they can cause whatever trouble they want if personal info is readily available. Why would I want anyone to know who I really am when that info in the wrong hands could potentially cost ME my case? I only know who you are because people keep reposting it, and now I've read your case. See wha...
  3. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:42
    This site gets so many hits in google searches by people with ACC issues, of course people will want to sign up, but someone is blocking those new, perfectly legitimate people.
    I understand wanting to know who people are and vet them before allowing them access to post on the site, but look at it from the other side - why should people entrust their real identity to anyone who drops...
  4. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:39
    The names afre often too relevant, like "AucklandAdvocates" and "psychosomatic" and "AccInducedHeadache" as well as loads or ordinary type user names you'd find anywhere. Someone has chosen to label them bots and that may be based on their incoming IP address, but then my second account I attempted to test the validation theories on has also not been val...
  5. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:35
    No, someone active on the site is deliberately only allowing the occasional new sign up. There were a couple in the middle of last year got through and commented on the forums, yet hundreds (and I do mean hundreds) before and after them do not have a validated user account and without one cannot participate or ask for help. I do not believe even the majority are attempted bot registrations.
  6. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:26
    You welcome . Glad to hear you are couping out there. I read your interesting reasoning of the locked registration to enable newbies to get in here for advise etc. obiviously you are up on your IT. Maybe it is the police who have locked the gate to registration. They have a interest in this site. I hope it is that will mean the johnny Manu issue will go no further they will just close foru...
  7. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 14:01
    Hi Mini, no not me with a treatment injury, just ACC tried to cite case law about a treatment injury case as relevant to a WRGPI case, and have had contact with a claimant also for WRGPI to do with lead poisoning. Thanks for thinking of me though :-)
  8. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 13:58
    Tish I have a case for you if you are the one with the 'Treament Injury'. I found it useful because it use section 32 and section 33. Please PM me if you want to know its name and get hold of it.
Page 1 of 1