ACCforum: Tish - Viewing Profile - ACCforum

Jump to content

User Rating: -----

Active Posts:
43 (0.03 per day)
Most Active In:
New Topics (21 posts)
23-September 15
Profile Views:
Last Active:
User is offline Private

My Information

Member Title:
Age Unknown
Birthday Unknown
Not Telling Not Telling

Contact Information

Click here to e-mail me

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: Ian I not a human to acc because I have a bad TBI

    15 May 2019 - 08:06 PM

    Good luck tomorrow :-)

    Ask questions, ask for them to write things down in plain English as well as record the conversation. Sometimes a piece of paper is easier to follow than a recording. A clued up support person is so much help so use whatever and whoever you can to make it easier for you to cope.

    Most of all, take deep breaths and remember you got this far, you can manage more with help.
  2. In Topic: Ian I not a human to acc because I have a bad TBI

    11 May 2019 - 03:03 PM

    View PostAlan Thomas, on 09 May 2019 - 04:50 PM, said:

    Essentially section 60 requires the ACC to determine permanent incapacity when there is no chance to return to the preinjury occupation because of injury. In other words if there is a decision under section 60 you are essentially retired. ACC are not allowed to rehabilitate you into a new occupation. However if you take it upon yourself to re-educate yourself and gain the experience necessary to work in a new occupation while still having regard to your injuries you absolutely will not lose your earnings compensation entitlements. To avoid double payments however ACC are entitled to a discount from your earnings of your new occupation by way of the abatement of earnings calculation procedure. This is not complicated however ACC staff do not receive any training so you might have to educate them.

    This guy needs real help and I can't offer much except find an advocate if he can who REALLY knows their stuff, and I don't mean some ignorant moron like Tony Carlyle in Reporoa, he doesn't know shit about anything but his bank account. He'll do his best to screw up your case for you, though.

    As an aside Alan, can you offer us a link to the specific part of the Act or any official documentation that deals with the bit about "ACC are not allowed to rehabilitate you into a new occupation" because I don't think I'm the only one who would find this of great usefulness. Thanks
  3. In Topic: ACC email address for OIA requests

    22 April 2019 - 01:42 PM

    View PostBrucey, on 22 April 2019 - 12:03 PM, said:

    Your sense of timing might be slightly out unfortunately

    THE OIA SYSTEM is currently being reviewed due to abuse of process, highlighted by Judith Collins and serial blogger Cameron Slater

    It was abused by several members from this site so i understand why you dont want personal info splattered globally

    There are articles on if you would care to check up

    If its a specific request re your own files, go via case manager

    If its a general or generic request re the corporation, check the website,your request might be through a specific person whos email addy might be there?

    Thanks Brucey, it is an open claim following a District Court ruling.

    ETA done and sent via the website.

  4. In Topic: Active plus

    09 March 2019 - 09:26 PM

    This her? http://www.psycholog...gister?pid=3441

    Practitioners Name THAKUR, Mrs Sangita
    Qualifications Bachelor of Arts Psychology, University of Poona, India, 26/11/1990
    Master of Arts Psychology, University of Poona, India, 18/11/1992
    Date of Registration 10 November 2006
    Status Registered, current practising certificate
    Scopes of Practice Psychologist
    Conditions on Scope of Practice Nil


Tish hasn't added any friends yet.


Page 1 of 1
  1. Photo


    12 Nov 2018 - 21:00
    Hi Mimi, just a quick catch up
    We won in Court at Appeal, Review was quashed by the Judge, ACC Toxicology Panel were described as dogmatic and unconstructive and the claim was sent back to ACC sent back to retest son's case against one small part of the Act, and only that.
    Apparently claim has to go back to the same Tox panel that just got their arses kicked for that ...
  2. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:45
    because right now, anyone can read most of the site, they just can't post and from that reading they can cause whatever trouble they want if personal info is readily available. Why would I want anyone to know who I really am when that info in the wrong hands could potentially cost ME my case? I only know who you are because people keep reposting it, and now I've read your case. See wha...
  3. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:42
    This site gets so many hits in google searches by people with ACC issues, of course people will want to sign up, but someone is blocking those new, perfectly legitimate people.
    I understand wanting to know who people are and vet them before allowing them access to post on the site, but look at it from the other side - why should people entrust their real identity to anyone who drops...
  4. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:39
    The names afre often too relevant, like "AucklandAdvocates" and "psychosomatic" and "AccInducedHeadache" as well as loads or ordinary type user names you'd find anywhere. Someone has chosen to label them bots and that may be based on their incoming IP address, but then my second account I attempted to test the validation theories on has also not been val...
  5. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:35
    No, someone active on the site is deliberately only allowing the occasional new sign up. There were a couple in the middle of last year got through and commented on the forums, yet hundreds (and I do mean hundreds) before and after them do not have a validated user account and without one cannot participate or ask for help. I do not believe even the majority are attempted bot registrations.
  6. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 15:26
    You welcome . Glad to hear you are couping out there. I read your interesting reasoning of the locked registration to enable newbies to get in here for advise etc. obiviously you are up on your IT. Maybe it is the police who have locked the gate to registration. They have a interest in this site. I hope it is that will mean the johnny Manu issue will go no further they will just close foru...
  7. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 14:01
    Hi Mini, no not me with a treatment injury, just ACC tried to cite case law about a treatment injury case as relevant to a WRGPI case, and have had contact with a claimant also for WRGPI to do with lead poisoning. Thanks for thinking of me though :-)
  8. Photo


    21 Apr 2018 - 13:58
    Tish I have a case for you if you are the one with the 'Treament Injury'. I found it useful because it use section 32 and section 33. Please PM me if you want to know its name and get hold of it.
Page 1 of 1