ACCforum: Claimants' Complaints Valid - ACCforum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Claimants' Complaints Valid Acclaim Media Release.

#1 Guest_IDB_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 May 2004 - 10:00 PM

This Media Release in response to the Accident Compensation Corporation Complaints Department findings to the complaints laid by claimants after offensive comments made to the media by ACC Healthwise Director David Rankin.

Related threads to this can be found at:

David Rankin Apology Via Acc Complaints, what a whitewash!
Dr. David Rankin, Allegations
Nasal Enemas Debate, David Rankins Reply
Teapot Rehabilitation - Tax-funded Therapy Gets Up Your Nose, nasal irrigation

Investigation CPANZ

Posted Image

Claimants' complaints valid
Monday, 10 May 2004, 12:20 pm
Press Release: Acclaim

Claimants' complaints valid

Many long term ACC claimants recently laid complaints with ACC's Office of the Complaints Investigator over David Rankin's inappropriate comments in media reports regarding Work Preparation Programmes.

Rankin said "People with serious injuries get into the habit of watching TV all day, getting up at midday and lose the routine, lose some of the self-presentation skills".

The letters received by claimants in the last few days state that the complaints investigator found the complaints to be valid and contains an apology from Dr Rankin.

His apology reads thus: "Let me say on the outset that my comments, as quoted, were not intended to cause offence. They obviously have, and for that I sincerely apologise.

There is no doubt that some long term seriously injured claimants have to face issues of depression and lack of motivation.Unfortunately I did not ensure that the article in the paper distinguished that my remarks were addressed at this minority of claimants.

I also appreciate the concerns raised about the use of the word "benefits". I acknowledge that ACC payments are entitlements, and I shall be mindful of this distinction in the future.

Once again I sincerely apologise for the offence my comments caused".

Dr Rankin also referred to "benefits" and apologised for confusing this with entitlements. "How could a member of the ACC executive make such a fundamental mistake - unless he was deliberately trying to spin the public mind." said an ACCLAIM spokesperson. "In that context his statements will obviously have influenced the minds of the ordinary person in the street."

ACC Complaints investigator, Peta Cherry, says she considers this apology to be sufficient remedy. Claimants however say that the original comment was made in the public arena and the apology must also be made in the public arena. As a medical doctor and an ACC executive with the motto Prevention, Care, Recovery Dr Rankin's adverse, generalised and, some would say, defamatory statements about people with serious injuries are important in the public interest.

In those circumstances claimants consider Dr Rankin's apology to be inadequate and unsatisfactory. It is now open to claimants to have the matters formally and independently reviewed. We understand that claimants are now considering that option apart from the expectation of a written public apology.

#2 User is offline   accvictim 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 04-November 03

Posted 11 May 2004 - 08:48 PM

Because Rankin is an insensitive pratt, and has no consideration for any injured person, his attiude is a reflection of the way all ACC staff are handling injured claimants.

#3 User is offline   flowers 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 25-March 04

Posted 11 May 2004 - 11:28 PM

Lets be honest and fair.
An arsehole cant help being an arsehole, its their nature, all they are good for is passing shit.
What does that say about an organisation that employes an arsehole to be their spokesperson??????????????????????????

Share this topic:

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users