MINI, on 14 February 2016 - 12:53 PM, said:
David Butler
I didn't accuse anyone. You said in the video to Dermot Nottingham that "Chrissie was the one who had all that stuff".
So it was you who accused her, or should I say named her as being a person who had hold of personal records of ACCforum members!!
I am simply asking if what you told D Nottingham is true or not??
After all when we joined this forum, the forum asked nothing personal of us at all.
We have ascertained that one of the cases you and LF and a few class as mine have been put up by Flowers. We have also ascertained that nobody has me agreeing that the case is mini's. including mini herself.
I have told you often enough that the name is not the problem it is the lies told about the person named that is the problem. Don't you understand English.
It is also well known that if one should use documentation meant for other use, than naming and defaming that person or persons is as quilty as the original if the carry the illegal statements on, for nefarious allegations.
I am simply wanting to know who other than Thomas Nottingham and Yourself have been collecting personal details about me so that you may lie about them and make my life a living hell with other AKA's jumping on board with you and yours to threaten my home with distruction, and myself with mental and physical harm.
I ask myself why has the house gone done from Google when the text hasn't.
I now know the answer to that.
I ask myself why as the blog of photos of myself in twenties tucked behind other documentation. All without me doing a thing. All been done in the past 3-6 months.
I now know the answer to that.
It is because my complaints have been taken very seriously and someone is trying to hide, but it is only working to confirm what I know to be true.
Then why did everything of H8ACC_2013 and Whetu go from here. Go into the Profiles, looks like they have made no posts.
good job I got all this information years ago eh?
I am still the same person as I ever was, I detest lies and those who bully just so they can say, look at how well I destroyed her.
Well I say, I may be battered, but I am not beaten and 2016 is my year.
You can argue with me all you like on here. This, plus all the facts that have been mounted to allow action to be taken, and the fact that you do not try to stop me legally, are all pointers that the facts are way to many for you to hide from and they will do what they are meant to, when the time comes.
At this time, I have other things to do, so will away.
Mini
You HAVE accused -many times this time against another person that you HAVE Inferred to the public that was involved in what you allege
thus you are leading others to believe what you infer.
As to the stuff that person may have had then you would have to be rather specific in any legal proceedings as to what stuff you are referring to.
You infer that is the collection and Passing of documents to another and there again YOU WILL HAVE TO BE SPECIFIC AS TO YOUR ACCUSATIONS IN A COURT OF LAW.
What i said in the video i know exctly word for word when why contact day dates and what was being discussed at any particular time
You Claire Hollis astoundingly HAVING BEEN INFORMED MANY TIMES YOUR WRONG,are accusing of all things based on what you have lifted from some other web site of which you ADMIT contains wrong information yet you continue to use as threats harass libel defamation etc etc to publish libel defamation content against others based on what you have lifted from another site thus repeating what others have published yet you have NO certainty of the actual factual truthfulness of what you use to accuse libel defame others with.
I would call that as being BLOODY STUPID however you have caused considerable damage and continue to do so against many others basing your accusations of info you CAN NOT FACTUALNESS with correct data as YOU DONT HAVE IT AND CAN NOT HAVE IT.
Using things someone else has said is DUMB DUMB abd DUMBER.
You have asked if what i told was true-Of course it was otherwise id a never said it , based on documents and publications of the likes of yourself-I dont have a problem with what was said- I do have a problem the way you portray information and then accuse falsely apon, from that which someone else has provided different than what it would be when shown in its original format in a court of law
WHICH that then leaves you as this >You are in a position of deep deep shite here Claire and altho im easy going and know your a loop head at times YOU DO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOURD OING OUT HERE thus my patience is running out
i have no wish to destroy or bankrupt you but the way you carry on the choices are becoming very limited there.
There is no agreeing to ascertain that you have not agreed you are not mini and nor that the case is not yours
Quite the contrary there when one reads just this thread alone you most certainly do show who you are and that the case is yours which is also the situation in many other threads in this forum.
What lies have been told about you im not sure having not bothered to chek what is here / out there by others is true or not but what i publish myself you can guarantee i have the back up to what ive said
you speak of using documents
this forum is for such purposes t assist others and your tax issues are of interest to acc claimants so it was placed in here very early on as info for acc claimants/members of this forums use.
AGAIN YOU ACCUSE OUTRIGHTLY re the collecting of personal information and that i have lied about them
Where have i published information about you and also where would it be lies as you accuse of.
akas are not my problem as i use my own name -as you well know
where the threats re home destruction are or where they came from iuf the do indeed exist i havnt a clue so STOP accusing me of that crap.
you house in google
you fotos down
probably as whomever placed then there realizes they may be in the shite so go them and stop going at me for others actions
You say you hate lies but Claire you ARE one of the most publicly known one in here that publishes lies about others
Rather hypocritical one must think there.
im not arguing with you in here ='what im doing is responding to YOUR LIES FASLE ACCUSATIONS YOU MAKE AGAINST ME
Ive told you why i dont legalize at you
you been publicly told to stop desist or i will respond showing you up as Claire Hollis
That i will continue as to me thats the best way to get your attention when some day you may think on just how big a f'k up youve made of yourself.
The day you call me into any court will be th day youll regret as it wil be costly
YOU BEEN WARNED CONTINUE AT YUOUR OWN PERIL Claire
suits me to strategem and let you accuse /turn up and show your wrong than go arguing for years in a court against you
You charge
you prove
i disprove very easily and then your fuked
Now be a good wee girl go away and speak to someone with some brains show them that your a nasty bitch and what your been up to,and take there advice and piss off before you do end up in trouble.
there are questions amongst the above but as usual Claire Hollis WONT respond to them as she is UNABLE TO DO SO AND USUAL FORM WOULD BE ANOTHER ROUND OF HER CRAPOLA ACCUSATIONS THINKING SHE IS MOTHER SUPERIOR
Why you persist in going about things as if they concern you as the one all centre of the universe who would know but a self opinionated better than anyone else would be a starting point for how you act out here so YOUR A NUNce Claire ,thats all a very very silly one at that.
You make up bullshit from bullshit a accuse with that
god help if that is how you were trained to act as a taxation expert to roll the peasants
That makes you NO BETTER [ actually worse as you have absconded yourself in here amongst vulnerable ones when your a nasty old women ]> than the acc staff acting like that where you accuse them of doing the same as you act yourself.
Regards
David Butler .