Help
MINI, on 09 September 2013 - 09:18 AM, said:
Who are 'we' 'tad wary of me in here David Butler, except you. You can only speak for you and your other names!! No one else.
it was clear that Alan Thomas has been a tad wary of me for many years. However, I only ever tended to look on him as a shit stirrer, a jealous wantabe, a self promoting wantabe business person, who kept 15 or 17 companies running and ACC caught him while he was gaining acc. these are the facts to me.
I have seen this type of wannabe business person a lot in my working life, and companies of that many were only needed to swish money around in and write out Tax invoices to look as though they belonged to either or company, and hide money away from the govt. Hence I consider I had a real dislike for him. But as I have pointed out with the Blurb scenario of naming me way back then, I am not the sort to hold garbage in my brain forever as I was busy fighting for my rights. Sure I may have sniped at both of them and flowers, but I would never want to or envisage any real harm coming to them and none of my sniping will show I was anything to do with and TBP incident or conspiracey.
Apart from you two known people on here, the newbies of H8ACC_2013, whetu, both newbies in 2013, with no tails of ACC taking money off them wrongfully or anything like that................a bit like you really. Have yet to be proved to be anyone other than you two as above or LV nottingham and co type people. Mind you I may have yet to catch up on some news so that be incorrect. Patience is the word.
Why would LF want to look my name up in a google tax search. Again they would have to have my name to do that, and someone would have had to give it too them. You could do it as you are a member of this sit ACCforum and you watched as others, such as Huggy ( took down and apoligised) but up my name during my tax years, but not that case. Flowers ( admin took the case down and it was never heard of again until LF picked it up). And Blurb, who of course got a right telling off from me, and he never mentioned it again. All this over at the very least a three year period. Could be longer as the events that took place had little to do with one another.
You still have told me who Nottingham was posting as in those days so that I may see what I have done to make him act in so an irrational way as to give LF your garbage, about me, that said I was a tax cheat, then go on to say I was and ACC Fraudster, give my house photo and address, and proceed at a latter date to threaten me. I had never heard of him or his brothers, but I have now havent I and a lot they have to answer for as well. The point being that whoever used my name in LF to break all those laws, is surely going to be proved wrongful and have to stand up at some time.
According to Whetu the newbie, who knows nothing, but says a lot, LF associates have going to be on my doorstep all weekend. No doubt the only reason they would want to come is to carry out the action they threatened too, previously, that is on google at this time.
Whetu, whoever they be, has also a lot to answer for in his/her flashing of me of messages of threat etc. They are recorded, so their is hardly any running from the fact that they happened. I might help you to understand the seriousness of these actions, to know that both admin and Banamac1 or Grant Mac came on to the forum as it was happening and guess what whetu did. He ran like a scalded rabbit, I kid you not, he was like the wind................he obviously didnt what to see others in there that could make his life a little be difficult to post. This was witnessed however, and snaps taken etc, so as far as I am concerned if whetu wants to end up talking to those that matter, I am sure he has done enough to grab their attention.
However, who would ever be discouraged by the nasty threatening nature of their posts. You guys are not worried that it goes on here, and as far as you both go in ordering people about, one could be unalarmed to find that one or both of you act as admin. You certainly have shown on here that you cover for each other by answering each others posts addressed to the opposite person. A very true pattern that one.
it was clear that Alan Thomas has been a tad wary of me for many years. However, I only ever tended to look on him as a shit stirrer, a jealous wantabe, a self promoting wantabe business person, who kept 15 or 17 companies running and ACC caught him while he was gaining acc. these are the facts to me.
I have seen this type of wannabe business person a lot in my working life, and companies of that many were only needed to swish money around in and write out Tax invoices to look as though they belonged to either or company, and hide money away from the govt. Hence I consider I had a real dislike for him. But as I have pointed out with the Blurb scenario of naming me way back then, I am not the sort to hold garbage in my brain forever as I was busy fighting for my rights. Sure I may have sniped at both of them and flowers, but I would never want to or envisage any real harm coming to them and none of my sniping will show I was anything to do with and TBP incident or conspiracey.
Apart from you two known people on here, the newbies of H8ACC_2013, whetu, both newbies in 2013, with no tails of ACC taking money off them wrongfully or anything like that................a bit like you really. Have yet to be proved to be anyone other than you two as above or LV nottingham and co type people. Mind you I may have yet to catch up on some news so that be incorrect. Patience is the word.
Why would LF want to look my name up in a google tax search. Again they would have to have my name to do that, and someone would have had to give it too them. You could do it as you are a member of this sit ACCforum and you watched as others, such as Huggy ( took down and apoligised) but up my name during my tax years, but not that case. Flowers ( admin took the case down and it was never heard of again until LF picked it up). And Blurb, who of course got a right telling off from me, and he never mentioned it again. All this over at the very least a three year period. Could be longer as the events that took place had little to do with one another.
You still have told me who Nottingham was posting as in those days so that I may see what I have done to make him act in so an irrational way as to give LF your garbage, about me, that said I was a tax cheat, then go on to say I was and ACC Fraudster, give my house photo and address, and proceed at a latter date to threaten me. I had never heard of him or his brothers, but I have now havent I and a lot they have to answer for as well. The point being that whoever used my name in LF to break all those laws, is surely going to be proved wrongful and have to stand up at some time.
According to Whetu the newbie, who knows nothing, but says a lot, LF associates have going to be on my doorstep all weekend. No doubt the only reason they would want to come is to carry out the action they threatened too, previously, that is on google at this time.
Whetu, whoever they be, has also a lot to answer for in his/her flashing of me of messages of threat etc. They are recorded, so their is hardly any running from the fact that they happened. I might help you to understand the seriousness of these actions, to know that both admin and Banamac1 or Grant Mac came on to the forum as it was happening and guess what whetu did. He ran like a scalded rabbit, I kid you not, he was like the wind................he obviously didnt what to see others in there that could make his life a little be difficult to post. This was witnessed however, and snaps taken etc, so as far as I am concerned if whetu wants to end up talking to those that matter, I am sure he has done enough to grab their attention.
However, who would ever be discouraged by the nasty threatening nature of their posts. You guys are not worried that it goes on here, and as far as you both go in ordering people about, one could be unalarmed to find that one or both of you act as admin. You certainly have shown on here that you cover for each other by answering each others posts addressed to the opposite person. A very true pattern that one.
MINI, on 09 September 2013 - 09:46 AM, said:
I have had all the information I need off this site for a number of months. The only left to gather is the extremly stupid way in which whetu attempts to scare the shit out of me.
Noticably I have not been banned lately as it gets closer to 'd' day, this of course means only that Alan Thomas wims of the first months back in accforum off house arrest have actually altered from using the thread he issued for me not long after he came back, to this latter approach which appears to be let her go, because whetu is flashing some hate messages at her which will shut her up.
This is the way I see, no one of the Thomas supporters one or two of you have expressed your horror and disagreement of such mean spitful writings as whetus flashings are. Oh no no because one of you is behind whetu's name. I am right arent I??
Mini
Noticably I have not been banned lately as it gets closer to 'd' day, this of course means only that Alan Thomas wims of the first months back in accforum off house arrest have actually altered from using the thread he issued for me not long after he came back, to this latter approach which appears to be let her go, because whetu is flashing some hate messages at her which will shut her up.
This is the way I see, no one of the Thomas supporters one or two of you have expressed your horror and disagreement of such mean spitful writings as whetus flashings are. Oh no no because one of you is behind whetu's name. I am right arent I??
Mini
MINI, on 09 September 2013 - 10:30 AM, said:
That is sthe most typical reply from you that I would expect. Your writings destory you.
Mind you Blurbs seem to do a fairly good job of it as well.
Mini
Mind you Blurbs seem to do a fairly good job of it as well.
Mini
MINI, on 09 September 2013 - 02:16 PM, said:
I do not see my problems as problems, when I see the stuff you were writing to Blurb in 2008. Oh my golly gosh, you are totally full of it arent you??
Like was you investigation with the ACC fraud people anything to do with the Fitzie letter??
What was the end result of your investigation. if you were in ACC corporates good books you would easily have a letter to say so wouldnt you?? As I have one from local office saying they do not consider any entitlement I have asked for and been given, has not been fraudulent.
Also telling Blurb not to mention on here that you are Hardwired as you dont want ACC to know. Now remembering that you were on w/c at the time, you are shown to be a backstabber of the people you are supposed to be assisting. Why should you not want ACC to know, for christs sake, you are dealing with corporates in ACC, yet you are telling Blurb you dont want them to know who you post as!!! Yep that is as straight as you would be in real life. Shape of dog hind leg!!!
Watch the walls tumble as the truth comes out...............you ready dog. Is it going to be tit for tat between you and Blurb or is it going to be..........put it all into a package and let the court sort it.
Oh bugger it I havent got time to be yakking with a two bit crime like you. I need to get onto more factual stuff. Although I must say Blurbs stuff I beleive and yours is shown to be needed some wariness about the extent to which you go to tell the truth................not very far. Not even a bloody non de plume that you could give up by snapping your fingers. Meaning that stuff Hardwired had written pre 2008 was not to be seen by ACC while you were on W/c. Most interesting. One would have to ask what were you trying to hide from ACC??? After all you never had to fight for your own rights as they never tried to take your erc/w/c off you did they???
Mini
Like was you investigation with the ACC fraud people anything to do with the Fitzie letter??
What was the end result of your investigation. if you were in ACC corporates good books you would easily have a letter to say so wouldnt you?? As I have one from local office saying they do not consider any entitlement I have asked for and been given, has not been fraudulent.
Also telling Blurb not to mention on here that you are Hardwired as you dont want ACC to know. Now remembering that you were on w/c at the time, you are shown to be a backstabber of the people you are supposed to be assisting. Why should you not want ACC to know, for christs sake, you are dealing with corporates in ACC, yet you are telling Blurb you dont want them to know who you post as!!! Yep that is as straight as you would be in real life. Shape of dog hind leg!!!
Watch the walls tumble as the truth comes out...............you ready dog. Is it going to be tit for tat between you and Blurb or is it going to be..........put it all into a package and let the court sort it.
Oh bugger it I havent got time to be yakking with a two bit crime like you. I need to get onto more factual stuff. Although I must say Blurbs stuff I beleive and yours is shown to be needed some wariness about the extent to which you go to tell the truth................not very far. Not even a bloody non de plume that you could give up by snapping your fingers. Meaning that stuff Hardwired had written pre 2008 was not to be seen by ACC while you were on W/c. Most interesting. One would have to ask what were you trying to hide from ACC??? After all you never had to fight for your own rights as they never tried to take your erc/w/c off you did they???
Mini
One must advise you here Claire ,due to the content of your writings to IMMEDIATELY go down to the Police and make a FORMAL complaint .
Dave
/>
/> 
/>
