ACCforum: Vocational & Occupational assessors info required - ACCforum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Vocational & Occupational assessors info required assessors

#1 User is offline   Raven 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 15-September 03

  Posted 10 October 2003 - 07:46 AM

Good morning ALL. Thanx for this wonderful new site.

My file was with AON risk services, their contract wasn't renewed so file went to catalyst, now catalyst is no more its back with acc, same case manager (Leanne MacDonnell)Takapuna, Auck.
She sent me for an assessment with a psychiatrist (Jan Reeves)to see which claim was the more predominant, back injury or sensitive claim. She advised that I do a pain program. they have ignored her advise & now want a vocational & occupational specialist report. She gave me options. =Mackay Services, Graeme Mackay, Grey Lynn-Auck.
Focus on Training, Paula Rewi, Manukau Auck.
Dr S Gavaghan-Remuera Auck. Dr David Scott-Milford Ayck.
Has anyone seen these acc approved providers???????
I have been given 7 days to decide. Have you seen any other providers that are not influenced by acc??
It seems to me that they are continueing the harrassment. Case manager catalyst almost tipped me over the edge last year, she seems to be on the same track again. I am so sick of their intimidation. She told me that she would not be providing me with transport to any appointments in the future. Because I take 2 support people with me to every meeting, she has decided they can drive me.
We had a meeting this week, I thought my med cert ran out next week, but I was wrong it was last week, she new at this weeks meeting. I do know that its my responsibility, but wouldn'y you think she would have mentioned it NO. I called her the next day, she advised legislation sayes, I know that but doesn't it make for good communication with claimant & case manager, she insisted legislation sayes. What a nasty bitch. So now all legislation will need to be adhered to, NO Exceptions.
Doesn't legislation say that all medical advisers of the claimant must be notified & asked for their input into the rehab of the claimant???? None of mine have been notified, except case manager did say that BMA had spoken to my GP, nothing in writing. I have a pain specialist-GP-Surgeon-councellor-advocate as my representatives, don't they have a right to be informed???

All advice-comment-opinions would be greatly appreciated.
0

#2 User is offline   greg 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1159
  • Joined: 15-September 03

  Posted 10 October 2003 - 08:01 AM

The first recommendation is to be responsible for your own rehabilatation
and required conact to be via written letters. This might help you to
remember / pain stress/ .

Confirm that the specialist you see has sited all your reports/documents needed to
allow a complete report to be written about you. The correct wording is on the sister site as well a copy of some letters you may be able to base your next
correspondence upon.

Find out which' Act' your are under, as the requirements for ACC. and you are
different, the changes supply a lot of their lope holes.
0

#3 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 06 September 2007 - 10:15 PM

Naughty girl LEANNE

it seems you have destroyed many more apart from me

fran van helmond
0

#4 User is offline   Witchiepoo 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: 27-January 05

Posted 07 September 2007 - 08:22 AM

do not communicate with these monkeys except in writing, ban all phone calls, faxs, emails ! Make them write !

didn't your support people have a previous meeting somewhere else prior to meeting you at your assessments ? therefore they have to get you a taxi or something as your ride is UNAVAILABLE !

demand you have a choice of assessors and make your own decision
0

#5 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 07 September 2007 - 10:18 AM

Including Ravens story above, which names LEANNE MACDONNELL, his is the 16th horror story that I now have on file of where the file was with AON NZ LTD, and was being managed by LEANNE MACDONNELL

All of these clients were very close to doing something silly (and unreversable if you get my drift) because of the treatment/attitude of one person, and thats LEANNE MACDONNELL!

God help the clients who are being manager by her now at the LTCU in Tatapuna!

As I have written before on this site, this control freak, LEANNE MACDONNELL is dangourus!

For all we know she was doing the same thing in South Africa (Zimbarway) and was deported to New Zealand!

She has a habit of ringing up the providers and telling them what to write .... as what she did to Dr Campbell, Dr Evan Dryson, Dr Tony Chew, Dr Tim Sprott, Dr Chris Wall etc

Because she was "Good at her job" while with AON, she got a job with the then CATALYST when AON's contract wasn't renewed in June/July 2002.

I phoned up ACC yesterday and asked if she was still at LTCU

The person answered Yes

God help the clients who she is destroying

Will soon see you in Court Leanne
0

#6 User is offline   freefallnz 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 29-June 04

Posted 07 September 2007 - 12:08 PM

Yep a corrupt, self serving, cow

Total bully, who abuses her position of power absolutely.

I wonder if any of her correspondence/illegal demands of claimants does not use the standard threat of disentitlement for non compliance with her totally illegal demands.

Incapable of acting in a reasonable manner and certainly incapable of communicating to claimants in adherence with the law and the claimants code of rights.

Probably related to Mengeles.
0

#7 User is offline   Maraqita 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 25
  • Joined: 29-June 09
  • LocationWellington Central City

Posted 10 November 2009 - 05:54 PM

View Postfreefallnz, on Sep 7 2007, 02:08 PM, said:

Yep a corrupt, self serving, cow

Total bully, who abuses her position of power absolutely.

I wonder if any of her correspondence/illegal demands of claimants does not use the standard threat of disentitlement for non compliance with her totally illegal demands.

Incapable of acting in a reasonable manner and certainly incapable of communicating to claimants in adherence with the law and the claimants code of rights.

Probably related to Mengeles.

Claimant we know complained about ACC & was told by LTCU branch team manager "Leanne is a good Case Manager". Google tells another story.

View PostRaven, on Oct 10 2003, 09:46 AM, said:

Good morning ALL. Thanx for this wonderful new site.

My file was with AON risk services, their contract wasn't renewed so file went to catalyst, now catalyst is no more its back with acc, same case manager (Leanne MacDonnell)Takapuna, Auck.
She sent me for an assessment with a psychiatrist (Jan Reeves)to see which claim was the more predominant, back injury or sensitive claim. She advised that I do a pain program. they have ignored her advise & now want a vocational & occupational specialist report. She gave me options. =Mackay Services, Graeme Mackay, Grey Lynn-Auck.
Focus on Training, Paula Rewi, Manukau Auck.
Dr S Gavaghan-Remuera Auck. Dr David Scott-Milford Ayck.
Has anyone seen these acc approved providers???????
I have been given 7 days to decide. Have you seen any other providers that are not influenced by acc??
It seems to me that they are continueing the harrassment. Case manager catalyst almost tipped me over the edge last year, she seems to be on the same track again. I am so sick of their intimidation. She told me that she would not be providing me with transport to any appointments in the future. Because I take 2 support people with me to every meeting, she has decided they can drive me.
We had a meeting this week, I thought my med cert ran out next week, but I was wrong it was last week, she new at this weeks meeting. I do know that its my responsibility, but wouldn'y you think she would have mentioned it NO. I called her the next day, she advised legislation sayes, I know that but doesn't it make for good communication with claimant & case manager, she insisted legislation sayes. What a nasty bitch. So now all legislation will need to be adhered to, NO Exceptions.
Doesn't legislation say that all medical advisers of the claimant must be notified & asked for their input into the rehab of the claimant???? None of mine have been notified, except case manager did say that BMA had spoken to my GP, nothing in writing. I have a pain specialist-GP-Surgeon-councellor-advocate as my representatives, don't they have a right to be informed???

All advice-comment-opinions would be greatly appreciated.

1

#8 User is offline   Moeroa 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 940
  • Joined: 20-November 09
  • LocationWellington Central City

Posted 06 April 2011 - 07:02 AM

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=RMaPTZdwjPE

View Postfreefallnz, on 07 September 2007 - 12:08 PM, said:

Yep a corrupt, self serving, cow

Total bully, who abuses her position of power absolutely.

I wonder if any of her correspondence/illegal demands of claimants does not use the standard threat of disentitlement for non compliance with her totally illegal demands.

Incapable of acting in a reasonable manner and certainly incapable of communicating to claimants in adherence with the law and the claimants code of rights.

Probably related to Mengeles.




http://lyricsplaygro...crocodile.shtml

View PostBLURB, on 07 September 2007 - 10:18 AM, said:

Including Ravens story above, which names LEANNE MACDONNELL, his is the 16th horror story that I now have on file of where the file was with AON NZ LTD, and was being managed by LEANNE MACDONNELL

All of these clients were very close to doing something silly (and unreversable if you get my drift) because of the treatment/attitude of one person, and thats LEANNE MACDONNELL!

God help the clients who are being manager by her now at the LTCU in Tatapuna!

As I have written before on this site, this control freak, LEANNE MACDONNELL is dangourus!

For all we know she was doing the same thing in South Africa (Zimbarway) and was deported to New Zealand!

She has a habit of ringing up the providers and telling them what to write .... as what she did to Dr Campbell, Dr Evan Dryson, Dr Tony Chew, Dr Tim Sprott, Dr Chris Wall etc

Because she was "Good at her job" while with AON, she got a job with the then CATALYST when AON's contract wasn't renewed in June/July 2002.

I phoned up ACC yesterday and asked if she was still at LTCU

The person answered Yes

God help the clients who she is destroying

Will soon see you in Court Leanne

3

#9 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 03 November 2011 - 11:47 AM

View PostRaven, on 10 October 2003 - 07:46 AM, said:

Good morning ALL. Thanx for this wonderful new site.

My file was with AON risk services, their contract wasn't renewed so file went to catalyst, now catalyst is no more its back with acc, same case manager (Leanne MacDonnell)Takapuna, Auck.
She sent me for an assessment with a psychiatrist (Jan Reeves)to see which claim was the more predominant, back injury or sensitive claim. She advised that I do a pain program. they have ignored her advise & now want a vocational & occupational specialist report. She gave me options. =Mackay Services, Graeme Mackay, Grey Lynn-Auck.
Focus on Training, Paula Rewi, Manukau Auck.
Dr S Gavaghan-Remuera Auck. Dr David Scott-Milford Ayck.
Has anyone seen these acc approved providers???????
I have been given 7 days to decide. Have you seen any other providers that are not influenced by acc??
It seems to me that they are continueing the harrassment. Case manager catalyst almost tipped me over the edge last year, she seems to be on the same track again. I am so sick of their intimidation. She told me that she would not be providing me with transport to any appointments in the future. Because I take 2 support people with me to every meeting, she has decided they can drive me.
We had a meeting this week, I thought my med cert ran out next week, but I was wrong it was last week, she new at this weeks meeting. I do know that its my responsibility, but wouldn'y you think she would have mentioned it NO. I called her the next day, she advised legislation sayes, I know that but doesn't it make for good communication with claimant & case manager, she insisted legislation sayes. What a nasty bitch. So now all legislation will need to be adhered to, NO Exceptions.
Doesn't legislation say that all medical advisers of the claimant must be notified & asked for their input into the rehab of the claimant???? None of mine have been notified, except case manager did say that BMA had spoken to my GP, nothing in writing. I have a pain specialist-GP-Surgeon-councellor-advocate as my representatives, don't they have a right to be informed???

All advice-comment-opinions would be greatly appreciated.





Quote

[64]The appellant was then referred to Dr Tony Chew, occupational medicine specialist. He advised that the appellant was fit to work for 30 hours per week as a website designer, developer or administrator.

[65]Dr Chew reported that the appellant agreed with the assessment in principle, but commented that he may have difficulty increasing his hours working on the web for 30 hours per week.

[66]The appellant then dealt with the difficulties that surrounded Dr Chew’s report. The appellant had objected to Dr Percival contacting Dr Chew.

[67]The appellant was then referred to Dr Tim Sprott for a further work capacity medical assessment, along with a number of background documents and material.

[68]Dr Sprott recommended that the appellant was capable of working as a website designer, website developer, website administrator and property developer. The appellant commented that website work would be within his capabilities if he was self employed, as he could structure his hours to work around his pain and disturbed sleeping pattern. He expressed concern over his administrative and bookkeeping skills.

[69]The appellant gave evidence. He said in regard to the three website jobs he had been self taught. He had researched his ideas to develop a website business. He knew the basics of website design, but did not have any qualifications or formal training, as he took it upon himself to learn the requirements of website design. He said he was unable to sit or drive for any length of time, and he described himself as an “ideas person” who paid out a significant amount of money to develop the website project. He wanted to engage people to do the actual work.

[70]The reviewer noted that the appellant did not have a University degree, or on-the-job training for the occupations of a website designer/developer and administrator. He is self taught with no formal qualifications.

[71]Despite that, the reviewer said that had the respondent sought to rely on Dr Chew’s report, then the work capacity decision would be quashed. However, that was not the case. Dr Chew’s report was disregarded, and a subsequent report sought from Dr Sprott. In effect, Dr Sprott identified the same jobs as Dr Chew, with the exception of the property manager role.


That Leanne is certainly a fat scum bitch
0

#10 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 11 November 2011 - 08:30 PM

This is exactly how she operates. Bullying, threats of financial penalties and menaces just part of her modus operandi. She also twists everything so the claimant and/or their GP or doctors are responsible for her decisions.

But then what do you expect from a white South African, Human Rights???


The Napoleon complex is named after French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. The conventional wisdom is that Napoleon compensated for his short height by seeking power, war and conquest. However, Napoleon was actually of average height for his time period and misconceptions may have been due to an incorrect conversion of his height because of confusion between French and English units. Historians have now suggested Napoleon was 5'6" (1.68 m) tall.[4] Napoleon was often seen with his Imperial Guard, which contributed to the perception of him being short because the Imperial Guards were above average height.[5] In psychology, the Napoleon complex is regarded as a derogatory social stereotype.[6]
http://en.wikipedia....apoleon_complex

View Postfreefallnz, on 07 September 2007 - 12:08 PM, said:

Yep a corrupt, self serving, cow

Total bully, who abuses her position of power absolutely.

I wonder if any of her correspondence/illegal demands of claimants does not use the standard threat of disentitlement for non compliance with her totally illegal demands.

Incapable of acting in a reasonable manner and certainly incapable of communicating to claimants in adherence with the law and the claimants code of rights.

Probably related to Mengeles.




2

#11 User is offline   Moeroa 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 940
  • Joined: 20-November 09
  • LocationWellington Central City

Posted 12 November 2011 - 01:30 AM

View PostBLURB, on 03 November 2011 - 11:47 AM, said:

That Leanne is certainly a fat scum bitch

Attached File  bullying.jpg (36.77K)
Number of downloads: 1


Introjection
In an influential article "Some Clinical Consequences of Introjection: Gaslighting", the authors argue that gaslighting involves the projection and introjection of psychic conflicts from the perpetrator to the victim: 'this imposition is based on a very special kind of "transfer"...of painful and potentially painful mental conflicts'.[4]

They explore a variety of reasons why the victims may have 'a tendency to incorporate and assimilate what others externalize and project onto them', and conclude that gaslighting can be 'a very complex, highly structured configuration which encompasses contributions from many elements of the psychic apparatus'.[4]


[edit]Resisting
With respect to women in particular, Hilda Nelson argued that "in gaslighting cases...ability to resist depends on her ability to trust her own judgements"[5] Establishing "counterstories" to that of the gaslighter may help the victim re-acquire or even for the first time "acquireordinary levels of free agency".[5]


[edit]Clinical examples
Psychologist Martha Stout states that sociopaths frequently use gaslighting tactics. Sociopaths consistently transgress social mores, break laws, and exploit others, but are also typically charming and convincing liars who consistently deny wrongdoing. Thus, some who have been victimized by sociopaths may doubt their perceptions.[6] Jacobson and Gottman report that some physically abusive husbands may gaslight their wives, even flatly denying that they have used violence.[citation needed]

Psychologists Gertrude Gass and William C. Nichols use the term "gaslighting" to describe a dynamic observed in some cases of marital infidelity: "Male therapists may contribute to the women's distress through mislabeling the women's reactions. [...] The gaslighting behaviors of the husband provide a recipe for the so-called 'nervous breakdown' for some women [and] suicide in some of the worst situations."[7]


[edit]


http://en.wikipedia....iki/Gaslighting





2

#12 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 12 November 2011 - 08:38 AM

this chick, is probably very highly paid, for her key performance indicators

however, as in the case of moeroas frind, she has overstepped the bounds of what is acceptable in NZ's multicultural society

the it sweep file shows exactly the dirty tricks these people are allowed to get away with

however, there is NO room for racism in nz....

take any case of hers to the race relations committee, and watch acc go into damage control!!!!
0

#13 User is offline   Moeroa 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 940
  • Joined: 20-November 09
  • LocationWellington Central City

Posted 12 November 2011 - 01:02 PM


View Postnot their victim, on 12 November 2011 - 08:38 AM, said:

this chick, is probably very highly paid, for her key performance indicators

however, as in the case of moeroas frind, she has overstepped the bounds of what is acceptable in NZ's multicultural society

the it sweep file shows exactly the dirty tricks these people are allowed to get away with

however, there is NO room for racism in nz....

take any case of hers to the race relations committee, and watch acc go into damage control!!!!


I doubt that very much. The above White South African BULLY http://www.bullyonli...ly/amibeing.htm hides behind the ACC's paid house niggers - that is ex-Maori Affairs uncle Toms like Joe Kupapa Cooper. This arselicker hides under Mac donnell's petticoats so held that Macdonnell's unreasonable and unlawful demands for personal tangihanga details is 'acceptable'.


http://accforum.org/...er/page__st__90


Quote

How do I recognise a bully?Most bullying is traceable to one person, male or female - bullying is not a gender issue. Bullies are often clever people (especially female bullies) but you can be clever too.

Who does this describe in your life?

  • Jekyll & Hyde nature - vicious and vindictive in private, but innocent and charming in front of witnesses; no-one can (or wants to) believe this individual has a vindictive nature - only the current target sees both sides
  • is a convincing, compulsive liar and when called to account, will make up anything spontaneously to fit their needs at that moment
  • uses lots of charm and is always plausible and convincing when peers, superiors or others are present; the motive of the charm is deception and its purpose is to compensate for lack of empathy
  • relies on mimicry to convince others that they are a "normal" human being but their words, writing and deeds are hollow, superficial and glib
  • displays a great deal of certitude and self-assuredness to mask their insecurity
  • excels at deception
  • exhibits unusual inappropriate attitudes to sexual matters or sexual behaviour; underneath the charming exterior there are often suspicions or intimations of sexual harassment, sex discrimination or sexual abuse (sometimes racial prejudice as well)
  • exhibits much controlling behaviour and is a control freak
  • displays a compulsive need to criticise whilst simultaneously refusing to acknowledge, value and praise others
  • when called upon to share or address the needs and concerns of others, responds with impatience, irritability and aggression
  • often has an overwhelming, unhealthy and narcissistic need to portray themselves as a wonderful, kind, caring and compassionate person, in contrast to their behaviour and treatment of others; the bully is oblivious to the discrepancy between how they like to be seen (and believe they are seen), and how they are actually seen
  • has an overbearing belief in their qualities of leadership but cannot distinguish between leadership (maturity, decisiveness, assertiveness, trust and integrity) and bullying (immaturity, impulsiveness, aggression, distrust and deceitfulness)
  • when called to account, immediately and aggressively denies everything, then counter-attacks with distorted or fabricated criticisms and allegations; if this is insufficient, quickly feigns victimhood, often by bursting into tears (the purpose is to avoid answering the question and thus evade accountability by manipulating others through the use of guilt)
  • is also ... aggressive, devious, manipulative, spiteful, vengeful, doesn't listen, can't sustain mature adult conversation, lacks a conscience, shows no remorse, is drawn to power, emotionally cold and flat, humourless, joyless, ungrateful, dysfunctional, disruptive, divisive, rigid and inflexible, selfish, insincere, insecure, immature and deeply inadequate, especially in interpersonal skills

I estimate one person in thirty has this behaviour profile. I describe them as having a disordered personality: an aggressive but intelligent individual who expresses their violence psychologically (constant criticism etc) rather than physically (assault). For the full profile, click here; to see and be able to recognise the four most common types of serial bully, click here.

http://www.bullyonli...ly/amibeing.htm
3

#14 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:32 PM

Quote

This article goes further than the “pain in the neck" definition of the workplace bully. It examines the bully as psychopath with their extraordinary ability to adapt to change. It is an irony that the complex psychological profiles of these individuals share many of the traits of the corporate “go-getters“ who the media glorifies.There have been many typologies of the workplace psychopath but most include these features:

  • authoritative, aggressive and dominating;
  • fearless and shameless;
  • devoid of empathy or remorse;
  • manipulative and deceptive;
  • impulsive, chaotic or stimulus seeking; and
  • a master of imitation and mimicry.
One key criterion that needs to be included in any typology is that they lack self knowledge. In short, and to paraphrase the Bible, “they know not what they do". This doesn’t mean that they are ignorant. Far from it. Their actions are often highly adaptive, self serving and intelligent. For them, the means justify the ends and those means include isolation, humiliation and psychological torture of their staff.

I am not suggesting that these work place "aliens" are a new species. I am suggesting that they are coming in to their own as our public and private institutions, both great and small, are buffeted by the new IR legislation.


The rise of casual or temporary work, the declining power of unions and a more deregulated workforce have helped create an environment where these individuals are less constrained by the demonstrated ethical behaviour of their more senior peers.
http://www.onlineopi...cle=6018&page=0


Quote

For other uses, see Gas lighting and Gaslight (disambiguation).Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse in which false information is presented with the intent of making a victim doubt his or her own memory and perception. It may simply be the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred, or it could be the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim.

The term "gaslighting" comes from the play Gas Light and its film adaptations. In those works a character uses a variety of tricks, including turning the gas lamps lower than normal, to convince his spouse that she is crazy. Since then it became a colloquial expression which has now also been used in clinical and research literature.[1][2]


The term "gaslighting" has been used colloquially since at least the late 1970s to describe efforts to manipulate someone's sense of reality. In a 1980 book on child sex abuse, Florence Rush summarized George Cukor's 1944 film version of Gas Light, and writes, "even today the word [gaslight] is used to describe an attempt to destroy another's perception of reality".[3]


[edit]


Introjection
In an influential article "Some Clinical Consequences of Introjection: Gaslighting", the authors argue that gaslighting involves the projection and introjection of psychic conflicts from the perpetrator to the victim: 'this imposition is based on a very special kind of "transfer"...of painful and potentially painful mental conflicts'.[4]

They explore a variety of reasons why the victims may have 'a tendency to incorporate and assimilate what others externalize and project onto them', and conclude that gaslighting can be 'a very complex, highly structured configuration which encompasses contributions from many elements of the psychic apparatus'.[4]





Resisting
With respect to women in particular, Hilda Nelson argued that "in gaslighting cases...ability to resist depends on her ability to trust her own judgements"[5] Establishing "counterstories" to that of the gaslighter may help the victim re-acquire or even for the first time "acquire ordinary levels of free agency".[5]


http://en.wikipedia....iki/Gaslighting


3

#15 User is offline   Campy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1386
  • Joined: 15-May 10
  • LocationAuckland Regional super city

Posted 12 March 2012 - 11:30 AM

freefallnz said:

1189123722[/url]' post='51109']
Yep a corrupt, self serving, cow

Total bully, who abuses her position of power absolutely.

I wonder if any of her correspondence/illegal demands of claimants does not use the standard threat of disentitlement for non compliance with her totally illegal demands.

Incapable of acting in a reasonable manner and certainly incapable of communicating to claimants in adherence with the law and the claimants code of rights.

Probably related to Mengeles.


TOTALLY illegal demands. For example, insistence on claimants relinquishing their Privacy Act rights and so surrender their non claim related medical information so as to use that data as excuse for claimants ongoing incapacity. AND Leanne macdonnell has and does disentitlement disabled injured claimants
Demands Maori claimants also surrender their code of claimant rights and forgo their right to practice their culture such as tangihanga.
Bullies mobility impaired claimants to attend inaccessible assessors, again breaching claimant code of rights to have their impairments respected and their right to be treated with dignity and respect.
Does not tell claimants of the above lack of mobility access, thereby breaches their code rights to effective communication.
Denies disabled claimants access to mobility aids and remedial devices such as wheelchairs, then bullies them to attend assessment to when they cannot walk.
Demands claimants remain under house arrest, pending her requiring they be home at any such time she decides to despatch appointments, whether they are unable to walk to the door for the courier or home or not. Then Leanne macdonnell penalizes and blames the claimant for a no show for appointments - no matter shes failed to check if the claimant has received the notice or not. Tough if the claimant did not receive the notice as they weren't home.Demands claimants gain her permission before leaving Their home. And macdonnell gives only 3 days notice for appointments so as to sabotage your clamant code right to a support person.
She disregards claimants right to be treated fairly.
1

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users