ACCforum: Total Declinature Of Claim / Alan Thomas - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 905 Pages +
  • « First
  • 689
  • 690
  • 691
  • 692
  • 693
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Total Declinature Of Claim / Alan Thomas Allegations of working while incapacitated

#13801 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 08 June 2015 - 01:45 PM

laudacrappin thought i was irene walker, a case manager

seems the evil irene thread was also pulled down...now who did that?

now that was a nasty piece of work


again with the mistaken identity.....

one person, and one only knew of my true identity.....

remains to be seen if they "fess Up""



and NO ALAN

apologize for what=...asking a question and being abused.......?


you weren't accused of anything...you were asked a direct question then quickly changed tack to needing assistance at D/C

i repeat, I Am not in , never have been, nor participate in any TAG TEAM.....
1

#13802 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 08 June 2015 - 01:56 PM

Quote

View Postnot their victim, on 08 June 2015 - 01:45 PM, said:

laudacrappin thought i was irene walker, a case manager

seems the evil irene thread was also pulled down...now who did that?

now that was a nasty piece of work


again with the mistaken identity.....

one person, and one only knew of my true identity.....

remains to be seen if they "fess Up""



and NO ALAN

apologize for what=...asking a question and being abused.......?


you weren't accused of anything...you were asked a direct question then quickly changed tack to needing assistance at D/C

i repeat, I Am not in , never have been, nor participate in any TAG TEAM.....


Re: i repeat, I Am not in , never have been, nor participate in any TAG TEAM.....

Nor was Mini and I involved!

Cheers

2

#13803 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7810
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 08 June 2015 - 01:57 PM

View PostDavid Butler, on 08 June 2015 - 01:21 PM, said:





Well just feel privileged Mr Butler!!

Mini
0

#13804 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 08 June 2015 - 02:05 PM

Quote

View PostDavid Butler, on 08 June 2015 - 01:18 PM, said:

as i neither own nor personally contribute to / gave approval for any of my /others documentation or information to be published
within the content of another web site fran they i have no need at all to be concerned or to save anything
I think that like myself You franny should heed take in ,to the appropriate saying ''Once its there there is sweet fuk all you can do about it''Posted Image


Best you go and find out who the web site publisher's are eh
not my problem never was .
Tis not as easy, as finding out who owns your ones to nab when needed
I await with pleasure ,your coming to arrest me fran .

David


We know who the blogs publisher is Mr Butler.

And he appears to be the sort of person that won't stand back to take all the legal consequences of what is published on his scumface blog by himself ... that has been demonstrated already soon after you spoke to via Skype video link in which you discussed accforum.org members!

So again I say, good luck to you and Alan Thomas when standing in front of the Judge!

1

#13805 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7810
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 08 June 2015 - 02:07 PM

View PostDavid Butler, on 08 June 2015 - 01:18 PM, said:

as i neither own nor personally contribute to / gave approval for any of my /others documentation or information to be published
within the content of another web site fran they i have no need at all to be concerned or to save anything
I think that like myself You franny should heed take in ,to the appropriate saying ''Once its there there is sweet fuk all you can do about it''Posted Image


Best you go and find out who the web site publisher's are eh
not my problem never was .
Tis not as easy, as finding out who owns your ones to nab when needed
I await with pleasure ,your coming to arrest me fran .

David


You did know and gave approval for the use of your documentation given to be used on the LF. You nodded to Nottingham knowingly and wilfully. (fraudulently)

Do you know what tacit approval is.......look it up.........give you something to do.

Peek-a boo

Mini
0

#13806 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 08 June 2015 - 02:08 PM

View PostMINI, on 08 June 2015 - 01:41 PM, said:

Interesting mr butler how trade me has been used for me re: Mr Nottingham. If the date is pre jan 2012 I did not know of mr Nottingham or any aka that he may be using and I diffenately did not do any Trade me banter about him that is for sure. He was nothing to me until I saw his reference in Lauda Finem in Jan 2012 and I had never known of the site since then.
They seemed to know enough of you from in here claire whether you knew who they wre is not an issue with me-the theme of threads was nottingham and you were there plus you show in her as an argy bargy one- [ being nice there for ya]
You were very well aware of whom he was and maybe you should have use ya noggin a tad and NOT argy baryd in those threads.
Trademe you were told warned many times you had trademe persoanl info issues but you said you never .and actually abused those tha let you know about YOUR trademe data,then ir was a so be it-lauda found them easily enough via trademe .

Talking about tax records etc, how come these people cannot understand law when one of them is supposed to be a lawyer.............Peek-a-boo!!
Who is this peekaboo >Is rex a lawyer then?
im sure they were tongue in cheek re that and used an anomie of events to show your never paid the tax re no returns so tax avoidance in other of words of their choosing.
thats how i read it anyways claire

The only reason any returns were put in is because I would not let IRD try to tax them all in the one year, which is the year we were in 2003/2004 After I had proved my right to w/c b/d to when I left work. My second win by myself...........I/A first b/d to date of injury and then w/c b/d to date of leaving my job of nine years.

So you see the IRD agreeing to put them in previous periods actually saved me money by cutting the amount of tax I had to pay. It had nothing to do with withholding tax returns as your mates at L/F said. And it is such a buzz that one of them is a lawyer. If it wasn't so serious it would be a lesson to everyone not to hire that legal beagle, as he cannot even read what is in front of him on a decision.

I agree with you for once NTV has been wrongly put in as one of the conspritors. In this case they cannot be as they were not a registered member of ACCforum.org or LF, at the time.
Ive shown you how ntv arrived there Claire similar to some others ,but you - had more to be found re your PUBLIC persona in and out of here in the acc tax courts systems plus your out here publishing's re the tax issues YOU Yourself made it very Claire who you were Fran made sure you were Claire Hollis as mini ,anyway publicly ,AND of course unlike ntv ,i IDID discuss you with dermot as one of the main nasty bastards in this forum so you seemed to have a many of settings to get you there
NASTY towards your fellow forum members /Self publications and trademe and the list goes on re you.
Now as thats all f all to do with me why dont ya be a good wee girl and go away until you have a case tO present with some FACTS
it as far as im concerned never about you whomever laudas researchers were
It was this place and what it does to harm others that was shown up .and the problems as with web sites it appears to be for you anyway,if you participate in them then your in the game moving round the board------------unless you leave .

David.


Mini

0

#13807 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 08 June 2015 - 02:17 PM

Quote

View PostDavid Butler, on 08 June 2015 - 02:08 PM, said:

View PostMINI, on 08 June 2015 - 01:41 PM, said:

Interesting mr butler how trade me has been used for me re: Mr Nottingham. If the date is pre jan 2012 I did not know of mr Nottingham or any aka that he may be using and I diffenately did not do any Trade me banter about him that is for sure. He was nothing to me until I saw his reference in Lauda Finem in Jan 2012 and I had never known of the site since then.
They seemed to know enough of you from in here claire whether you knew who they wre is not an issue with me-the theme of threads was nottingham and you were there plus you show in her as an argy bargy one- [ being nice there for ya]
You were very well aware of whom he was and maybe you should have use ya noggin a tad and NOT argy baryd in those threads.
Trademe you were told warned many times you had trademe persoanl info issues but you said you never .and actually abused those tha let you know about YOUR trademe data,then ir was a so be it-lauda found them easily enough via trademe .



Talking about tax records etc, how come these people cannot understand law when one of them is supposed to be a lawyer.............Peek-a-boo!!
Who is this peekaboo >Is rex a lawyer then?
im sure they were tongue in cheek re that and used an anomy of events to show your never paid the tax re no returns so tax avoidance in other of words of their choosing.
thats how i read it anyways claire


The only reason any returns were put in is because I would not let IRD try to tax them all in the one year, which is the year we were in 2003/2004 After I had proved my right to w/c b/d to when I left work. My second win by myself...........I/A first b/d to date of injury and then w/c b/d to date of leaving my job of nine years.

So you see the IRD agreeing to put them in previous periods actually saved me money by cutting the amount of tax I had to pay. It had nothing to do with withholding tax returns as your mates at L/F said. And it is such a buzz that one of them is a lawyer. If it wasn't so serious it would be a lesson to everyone not to hire that legal beagle, as he cannot even read what is in front of him on a decision.


I agree with you for once NTV has been wrongly put in as one of the conspritors. In this case they cannot be as they were not a registered member of ACCforum.org or LF, at the time.
Ive shown you how ntv arrived there Claire similar to some others ,but you - had more to be found re your PUBLIC persona in and out of here in the acc tax courts systems plus your out here publishing's re the tax issues YOU Yourself made it very Claire who you were Fran made sure you were Claire Hollis as mini ,anyway publicly ,AND of course unlike ntv ,i IDID discuss you with dermot as one of the main nasty bastards in this forum so you seemed to have a many of settings to get you there
NASTY towards your fellow forum members /Self publications and trademe and the list goes on re you.
Now as thats all f all to do with me why dont ya be a good wee girl and go away until you have a case tO present with some FACTS
it as far as im concerned never about you whomever laudas researchers were
It was this place and what it does to harm others that was shown up .and the problems as with web sites it appears to be for you anyway,if you participate in them then your in the game moving round the board------------unless you leave .


David.





Mini


Re: "lauda found them easily enough via trademe ."

How do you know that Mr Butler, did he tell you that?

1

#13808 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10813
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 08 June 2015 - 02:45 PM

Please focus your attention to the topic at issue

This thread is about whether or not the ACC allegations that I was working in an whether allegations of work is capable of determining an end of incapacity.
1

#13809 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 08 June 2015 - 02:54 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 08 June 2015 - 02:45 PM, said:

Please focus your attention to the topic at issue

This thread is about whether or not the ACC allegations that I was working in an whether allegations of work is capable of determining an end of incapacity.


Are we getting to close to the truth again Mr Thomas so you want to get back to the topic in issue?

Far too late for that because you'r heading to have "Criminal Harassment" added to your list of current Criminal Convictions!

Post #14035
1

#13810 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 08 June 2015 - 03:12 PM

In reply to your post 14033 as i really cant be bothered pissing round copying them to here.
well saved in the archive tho frannyboyPosted Image
twas all saved / done before i even came back in .

So Who is he Fran= lauda appears to have found them via trademe .


SO THEN You stating the laudaman is actually a he then
Thats good news as i was wondering about that There be some clever tech savy ladies around with net based skills that would be far more than yours.
But alas franny another false trail you lead yourself apon
IT IS VERY SIMPLE TO READ LAUDA AND SEE WHERE IT CAME FROM .
You ever bother to do that Plus it was posted in here re the issues re the trademe / facebook data being available freely.

then we have a laudaman now
Claire is stating that it is someone Rex who is a really a lawyer called peekaboo
so who is it to be then franny
The he you think it is /peekaboo who claire thinks it is or really no one in particular that you cant find?
Having never spoken to whomever the laudaman is . as your the one that alleges is a he >Then the alleged laudaman being named as he, -He couldnt have possibly have told me anything Fran

and in any event
In respect to a he or a she -Whilst some may well think that, However i could not possibly comment at this time.

david
0

#13811 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7810
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 08 June 2015 - 03:18 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 08 June 2015 - 01:38 PM, said:

Mini is there any possibility that I could lose when the ACC failed to make a decision on a claim application for 30 months and then when they did make a decision on a rescinded on the day of the review hearing and still have not placed that rescinded decision with another one. The review hearing sought the reviewer to confirm the deemed decision. The reviewer's Decision addressed whether or not he could determine the veracity of the ACC decision that was rescinded.

I thought you might like to go along for the entertainment value


Thomas

Of course there is every possibility that you could lose. You are dealing with ACC here and I am not a fortune teller!! If I was I probably wouldn't even bother answering your stupid questions. We all know ACC's has not shown much sense when it comes to some very high cases such as Kearney where even the Judges were reading the law wrongly.

One knows it takes a very specialised lawyer such as Mr Sara, to win these cases. So anything is possible when you take your own case that has continually been bought up before the courts previously by you and got chucked out. I would say, on a guess that you will probably be got with Res judicata or breach of process or maybe both. Lets hope they don't hit you with costs again.

Or more than I will start beginning how you can afford to pay all the costs, live and get you hand operated on, while on only WINZ as an income.

Mini
0

#13812 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7810
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 08 June 2015 - 03:25 PM

Thanks Blurb

Mini
0

#13813 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 08 June 2015 - 03:37 PM

View PostMINI, on 08 June 2015 - 02:07 PM, said:

You did know and gave approval for the use of your documentation given to be used on the LF. You nodded to Nottingham knowingly and wilfully. (fraudulently)

Do you know what tacit approval is.......look it up.........give you something to do.

Peek-a boo

Mini


claire Im very well aware of the term.

rather serious accusations to make in public there lady and fraudulently how the heck do you arrive at that as an accusation
cant be fraud Claire ITS FACTS HE GOT from me >>>>>>>>>Not bullshit. like you are a nasty person thats a fact. /Documents ,well they were all penned by the writers of then such as weal so play the game some more-
Surely Your not >NOW saying Douglas WEAL and Kenny Miller are fraudulent then ,Yu must be as thats their documents that went there->Your losing again calorie babe
altho i see the person named ''bullshit extremo'' appeared in there quite often
whether i nodded to nottingham or not is mine to do as i please when I like-or maybe i have M/S- Parkinson's

You state i did know something -which is in direct reference to the publication of content within laudafinem
Now that something and from the world of >Silently Posted Image,
you cant know from what youve got-which is a load of crap tapes telling you nothing but a cut mixed up tale of bollocks as an actual real time chat content ,from a host of other tapes
you really are a silly old girl at times
But alas as like fran you leap into the unknown not knowing what the unknown is
and at this point in time
IM NOT FUKEN TELLING YA
But its bad news time
memorandum of agreement mean anything to you at all Claire
and of course as you state MY documentation = YOU HAVNT A CLUE WHAT I GAVE Dermot AND WHAT I NEVER GAVE HIM, SO TO YOU here as of now for ya lawyers records Claire >>>>>>What documentation of others is published i coldnt give a damn really Calire.
BET YA'D LOVE TO KNOW WHATS IN THAT list of MY documents-But ya not going to until i slay you as a winner in court.
You get more ridiculous and darker ,as in where the f are you coming from now like = by the hour Claire
In fact im sure your going insane at times go get some help please.

David
0

#13814 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10813
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 08 June 2015 - 04:54 PM

View PostBLURB, on 08 June 2015 - 02:54 PM, said:

Are we getting to close to the truth again Mr Thomas so you want to get back to the topic in issue?

Far too late for that because you'r heading to have "Criminal Harassment" added to your list of current Criminal Convictions!

Post #14035


You are one of those who obviously have an obsessive compulsive disorder about me and continually stalked me on this site inventing imaginary things that have nothing whatsoever to do with me or my actions but rather the compulsive obsessive disorder and behaviour problems of others that are just like you.
0

#13815 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10813
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 08 June 2015 - 04:58 PM

View PostMINI, on 08 June 2015 - 03:18 PM, said:

Thomas

Of course there is every possibility that you could lose. You are dealing with ACC here and I am not a fortune teller!! If I was I probably wouldn't even bother answering your stupid questions. We all know ACC's has not shown much sense when it comes to some very high cases such as Kearney where even the Judges were reading the law wrongly.

One knows it takes a very specialised lawyer such as Mr Sara, to win these cases. So anything is possible when you take your own case that has continually been bought up before the courts previously by you and got chucked out. I would say, on a guess that you will probably be got with Res judicata or breach of process or maybe both. Lets hope they don't hit you with costs again.

Or more than I will start beginning how you can afford to pay all the costs, live and get you hand operated on, while on only WINZ as an income.

Mini


If you cannot contribute to the legal discussion why bother commenting at all.

Your comment seems to be endorsing the ACC behaviour instead of looking at the mechanisms available to us to correct these very obvious wrongs. You go on to blame the system for being at fault yet you then blame me because of the system. That is not the thought patterns of a rational person
0

#13816 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 08 June 2015 - 06:19 PM

View PostDavid Butler, on 08 June 2015 - 03:37 PM, said:

claire Im very well aware of the term.

rather serious accusations to make in public there lady and fraudulently how the heck do you arrive at that as an accusation
cant be fraud Claire ITS FACTS HE GOT from me >>>>>>>>>Not bullshit. like you are a nasty person thats a fact. /Documents ,well they were all penned by the writers of then such as weal so play the game some more-
Surely Your not >NOW saying Douglas WEAL and Kenny Miller are fraudulent then ,Yu must be as thats their documents that went there->Your losing again calorie babe
altho i see the person named ''bullshit extremo'' appeared in there quite often
whether i nodded to nottingham or not is mine to do as i please when I like-or maybe i have M/S- Parkinson's

You state i did know something -which is in direct reference to the publication of content within laudafinem
Now that something and from the world of >Silently Posted Image,
you cant know from what youve got-which is a load of crap tapes telling you nothing but a cut mixed up tale of bollocks as an actual real time chat content ,from a host of other tapes
you really are a silly old girl at times
But alas as like fran you leap into the unknown not knowing what the unknown is
and at this point in time
IM NOT FUKEN TELLING YA
But its bad news time
memorandum of agreement mean anything to you at all Claire
and of course as you state MY documentation = YOU HAVNT A CLUE WHAT I GAVE Dermot AND WHAT I NEVER GAVE HIM, SO TO YOU here as of now for ya lawyers records Claire >>>>>>What documentation of others is published i coldnt give a damn really Calire.
BET YA'D LOVE TO KNOW WHATS IN THAT list of MY documents-But ya not going to until i slay you as a winner in court.
You get more ridiculous and darker ,as in where the f are you coming from now like = by the hour Claire
In fact im sure your going insane at times go get some help please.

David


A new twist in your already twisted deluded fantasy David Butler re "memorandum of agreement"?

We didn't see that angle coming ... seems like David has learn a few new words LOL

If we were to make a reality show out of all this, would you be interested in playing "David Butler" the main character, David Butler?

There's a number of other spots available as well, Alan Thomas may be interested in playing himself ....

The name of the Reality Show would be "ACCforum NZ LIVE"
1

#13817 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 08 June 2015 - 07:00 PM

View PostBLURB, on 08 June 2015 - 06:19 PM, said:

A new twist in your already twisted deluded fantasy David Butler re "memorandum of agreement"?

We didn't see that angle coming ... seems like David has learn a few new words LOL

If we were to make a reality show out of all this, would you be interested in playing "David Butler" the main character, David Butler?

There's a number of other spots available as well, Alan Thomas may be interested in playing himself ....

The name of the Reality Show would be "ACCforum NZ LIVE"

#####################################################################################################################
From david below for ya frannyboy

Now An angle -why would i need an angle fran, Strait forward business deal and thus an agreement re the ins and out saves a great deal of hassle some times especially this time ,,BUT YOU GET THE HASSLE 's -NOT ME-and you never saw it coming either HOW BLOODY SAD FOR YOU
I engaged a contractor to do as i required.
OF COURSE there be a memorandum of agreement agreed to by the PARTIES CONCERNED, etc as to what was to be when etc ,and what Not to be done so fran Seems to be that again- YOU BEEN FUKED OVER matey
I note many years ago you went broke because of your lack of business acumen.[screwed by ones more clever than you ] and time that you learnt of some of those big words you dont understand.] Much cheaper in the long run franny to know what ya doing and why.
yep- maybe time for you to learn some new words if you ever mange to do anything called work again. and they will definitely come in real handy within court proceedings for ya .
You wish is my command Fran -Its a REALITY arriving but NOT in the manner that you think
keep an eye out mate
YOUR the STAR in this one- as The Dutch Fuktard otherwise known as the Purple Helmet.Posted Image

0

#13818 User is offline   Tomcat 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2158
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 08 June 2015 - 07:51 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 08 June 2015 - 04:54 PM, said:

You are one of those who obviously have an obsessive compulsive disorder about me and continually stalked me on this site inventing imaginary things that have nothing whatsoever to do with me or my actions but rather the compulsive obsessive disorder and behaviour problems of others that are just like you.


Posted Image.... Obsessive compulsive disorder in your case THOMAS, has been well and truly established ...
By the courts... By various Psychs... By genuine members and observers...
You persistently accuse every one else of what you are and are guilty of...
It is hugely laughable how you keep trying to make out you are innocent of any wrong doing...

You made the court disclosure docs. / info available to others =(Esayrider=Buttler=NothingHam=and others...obviously done after you were sentenced)
to use as a means of intimidation / blackmail / incitement to commit a crime...
And for that you will suffer the consequences of your evil intent, as will those you enlisted to achieve a result, to perpetrate "perversion of justice"...
"Note: Unless specifically requested by the individual concerened, or whre required by law, criminal conviction information will not be disclosed to a third party (this applies regardless of the "clean slate" issue)
where an individual is elligible to have that information concealed under the Criminal Records (Clean Slate) Act 2004 or where that information is suppressed by statute or court order."


AND there is no point in you and your nutter tag team posting up more bovine discharge re the above because NO ONE BELIEVES ANY OF YOU...
2

#13819 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 08 June 2015 - 08:05 PM

memorandum of agreement???

with whom?
1

#13820 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 08 June 2015 - 08:59 PM

We don't understand what you are attempting to say David, can you be a bit more specific?

Memorandum of agreement?

Are you confirming that you have an Memorandum of Agreement with somebody or some business organisation for you to "fuk" me over?

Or is it the other way around, you have an agreement with someone or some business organisation for them to "fuk" me over on your behalf?

Quote

From david below for ya frannyboy

Now An angle -why would i need an angle fran, Strait forward business deal and thus an agreement re the ins and out saves a great deal of hassle some times especially this time ,,BUT YOU GET THE HASSLE 's -NOT ME-and you never saw it coming either HOW BLOODY SAD FOR YOU
I engaged a contractor to do as i required.
OF COURSE there be a memorandum of agreement agreed to by the PARTIES CONCERNED, etc as to what was to be when etc ,and what Not to be done so fran Seems to be that again- YOU BEEN FUKED OVER matey
I note many years ago you went broke because of your lack of business acumen.[screwed by ones more clever than you ] and time that you learnt of some of those big words you dont understand.] Much cheaper in the long run franny to know what ya doing and why.
yep- maybe time for you to learn some new words if you ever mange to do anything called work again. and they will definitely come in real handy within court proceedings for ya .
You wish is my command Fran -Its a REALITY arriving but NOT in the manner that you think
keep an eye out mate
YOUR the STAR in this one- as The Dutch Fuktard otherwise known as the Purple Helmet.


Attached File  david_butler_08_June_2015_07-00PM_memorandum_of_agreement.png (48.22K)
Number of downloads: 12
2

Share this topic:


  • 905 Pages +
  • « First
  • 689
  • 690
  • 691
  • 692
  • 693
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

9 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users