ACCforum: Total Declinature Of Claim / Alan Thomas - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 828 Pages +
  • « First
  • 826
  • 827
  • 828
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Total Declinature Of Claim / Alan Thomas Allegations of working while incapacitated

#16541 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7683
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted Today, 03:26 PM

View PostMINI, on 23 October 2017 - 03:19 PM, said:

Alan Thomas

"With regards to any health and safety issues concerning my attending review hearings are going, there is no health and safety issue described by anybody"

Wrong: Both ACC and WINZ have both banned you from their buildings because of health and safety reasons, so the issue has been "described by anybody". In fact two bodies.

This is a disgusting twist in the use of facts that you require for any other hearings and you do it often, to make yourself appear much less troublesome than you actually are.

Mini


Neither the ACC nor WINZ have any information of any sort that could cause them to believe any kind of health and safety issue existed. You do not seem to realise that government departments including IRD quite routinely accuse people are threatening behaviour for no other reason that they do not want to deal with the individual as that individual is exposing their own wrongdoing. It is you that are generating a disgusting twist of which those bureaucrats rely upon as the basis for their behaviour. I repeat there is no information of any sort that could form the basis of anyone considering that there is a health and safety issue. It seems to me mini that you are believing the propaganda that you and the rest of your tagteam have set out against me when that propaganda becomes relied upon by a third party.A third-party believing your propaganda does not in any way or form make it real. You might as well join chicken licken and say the sky is falling in Because you are being that silly. However you are not silly but rather simply evil
0

#16542 User is offline   anonymousey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2160
  • Joined: 04-April 06

Posted Today, 04:06 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 23 October 2017 - 01:55 PM, said:

The let's make this absolutely clear, it is the medical profession who have informed me that I am injured.
...
I can't believe how stupid some people are when they develop a belief system and them all go to great lengths to support that belief system regardless of the proof beyond reasonable doubt evidence provided by the medical profession. If they are not stupid the only other conclusion that can be made is that they are incredibly dishonest and even evil.


Alan the specialists are clearly being professionals and recording the stories you tell them verbally. Obviously the how, when, where, and why questions are being explored by ACC &or other professionals with regards to your eligibility and entitlements. Basically you are so narrowminded and stuck on the ^what^ and what you think the CTscans are showing and are still stuck in that tunnel etc I am referring to the objective factual matrix which supports your subjective selfreporting. At present I do not know if ACC have made another decision or not on this issue for you Alan, so you may still have a small window of opportunity to start behaving smarter and doing better with your submissions etc

As far as I can tell most everything you gob is unsubstantiated by independent sources Alan. This is further complicated by the other history which ACC has already obtained in relation to your claims eg records of you impersonating other claimants or staff with the telephone manipulations NZLII or you yourself have described within this forum..

These Specialist medical opinions may also record some tests undertaken with you obviously Alan, so some of them are referenced or detailed in the judgements too eg all the normal neurology testing in hospital. Then there are issues surrounding any discharge recommendations relating to psychiatric referrals. Differential diagnoses are also mentioned in some of these reports Alan eg fatigue

As this forum details many illustrations of reckless behaviour in your past from your own disclosures, alongside other more subtle indicators of self harm and self medicating - some of these factors may also explain origin of your infarct Alan. However if you are not disclosing such immature or illegal personal history and instead googling lists to create your story to the medics ... then IMHO many significant questions will be asked by ACC concerning these matters....

However to get back to the Appeal issue raised, Judge Henare has emphasised that you need to obtain satisfactory evidence ^from 1993^ for ACC to make a decision on your claim?

Personally I do not see any of the medical evidence already detailed in NZLII as assisting your submission as these doctors are clearly detailing it is self reported material on historical allegations or procedures etc Obviously if any of these doctors were treating you directly in 1993 themselves, then I would expect a clinical reference to such an encounter if they are seeing you a second time many years later etc
0

#16543 User is offline   anonymousey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2160
  • Joined: 04-April 06

Posted Today, 04:08 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 23 October 2017 - 03:26 PM, said:

Neither the ACC nor WINZ have any information of any sort that could cause them to believe any kind of health and safety issue existed. ...


Of course they do Alan

This forum is littered with numerous different threats from you written under your moniker against ACC particularly ...
0

Share this topic:


  • 828 Pages +
  • « First
  • 826
  • 827
  • 828
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

8 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users