ACCforum: Also Ensure Charges Are Fixed Up As Discussed - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Also Ensure Charges Are Fixed Up As Discussed Ian Pickersgill 2 Garry Ronald Rae

#21 User is offline   Al9lifes 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 16-October 05

Posted 02 July 2007 - 01:13 PM

Quote

To prejudice the maintenance of law, including the prevention, investigation, and detection of offences, and the right to a fair trial.

Does this mean AND the right to a fair trial ?

ACC thinks this means or.
ACC has compromised the maintainance of law with criminal actions and intent.
0

#22 User is offline   doppelganger 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1740
  • Joined: 19-September 03

Posted 02 July 2007 - 05:26 PM

in this case it means that ACC does not want you to have information as it is not about you. this is nothing to do with honesty or any other judicial process.

you can not up set the process as the information is what you have done, completed, or was going to be done if you are the person who has already completed what ever they say that you have completed.

That section of the privacy Act does not apply unless you are completing criminal activity like robbing a bank, making bombs, or any other terrorist event.

Obtaining medical care from a registered health professional can not be though you are going about planing how to destroy life.

On the other the two mention in the above posts may have been thinking about destroying your life. Certainly they had plans to gain from your loss of entitlement.
0

#23 User is offline   Al9lifes 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 16-October 05

Posted 13 August 2007 - 06:03 PM

http://www.accforum.org/forums/index.php?s...ost&p=49619
0

#24 User is offline   Al9lifes 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 16-October 05

Posted 30 August 2007 - 05:32 PM

Quote

6 APR 2006
I have been informed that a fraud investigation took place in 2002.
I am advised that the criminal charges were laid but were later withdrawn as ACC had not obtained sufficient evidence to establish the high burden of proof that is required for a successful criminal conviction.
Hon Ruth Dyson
MINISTER FOR ACC

0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users