IN THE DISTRICT COURT HELD AT WELLINGTON
Decision No. 235 /2000
UNDER
The Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Act 1992
AND
IN THE MATTER
of an appeal pursuant to section 91 of the Act
BETWEEN
JUDY LIDDELL of Wellington
Appellant
(Appeal No. Al 220/99)
AND
ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act
Respondent
HEARING at WELLINGTON on the 18th day of May 2000
APPEARANCES/COUNSEL
P J Zumbach for appellant
M M Ahem for respondent
RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A W MIDDLETON
The issue in this appeal is whether the respondent was correct in its decision of 22 March 1999 that the appellant had a capacity to work.
I have delayed the issue of this judgment because Ms Zumbach questioned the qualifications of the medical assessor. When details of his qualifications had been provided to counsel and I received submissions from Ms Zumbach that I should prefer the expertise of Dr J Keir Howard to that of the assessor, Dr B Christian, I was then prepared to issue my judgment. However, in the meantime, I had received a similar submission in relation to Dr Christian in the course of another appeal. As I thought the result of further investigations might also apply to the issue in this appeal, I have delayed the issue of this judgment but I am now satisfied that the additional concerns raised in that other appeal are not relevant to this appeal are that Dr Christian was a properly qualified medical assessor.
Attached File(s)
-
Liddell_v_ACC_235_2000_AI_220_99.pdf (58.39K)
Number of downloads: 47