Pearce v ACC cp57 89 HC Rotorua
Judgment: High Court, Rotorua (CP57/89) 26, 27 June; 10 October 1991
Judge: Penlington J
PEARCE v ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION
High Court, Rotorua (CP57/89) 26, 27 June; 10 October 1991
Penlington J
Pleadings Striking out Confusing causes of action alleged Composite causes of action Want of particulars Amendment High Court Rules. rr l08, 114, 181, 186.
Pleadings Striking out No reasonable cause of action disclosed Abuse of process High Court Rules, r 186.
Pleadings Further particulars Claims for exemplary damages, vicarious liability for assault, and breach of statutory duty More explicit statement of claim High Court Rules, r 185,
"That on or about the 27th day of April 1988 while acting as the defendant's agent the private investigator threatened to strike the plaintiff and then did strike him several blows on the arm with a baton, causing the plaintiff distress, worry, anger, shock and humiliation. In addition at the same time and on other diverse occasions, the private investigator, while acting as the defendant's agent committed offences under s 52 of the Private Investigators and Security Guards Act, 1984 by taking photographs and/or videotape recordings of the plaintiff and the plaintiffs wife, without their consent."
Attached File(s)
-
Pearce_v_ACC_cp57_89.pdf (136.25K)
Number of downloads: 93