ACCforum: Death threats - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 14 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Death threats

#41 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 12:05 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 11:05 AM, said:

WRONG
The first exhibits titled number one exhibit was the document produced by you as an email sent to the ACC. The ACC staff member entered the exhibit into court as an exhibit that initiated them being terrorised..
As you can appreciate it as an official court document and court record that you have produced a document for the purposes of terrorising the ACC. The only question of fact is whether or not what you were saying was true. As you had never had any connection with myself for the purposes of reaching any conclusions reported by you to the ACC you need to be examined by the court to determine where you acquired your impressions and whether or not you had any reasonable reason to cause the ACC to become terrorised by your document.

We have telephone records of your voice confirming that you obtained all information from Douglas weal and that you had discussed what you heard from him with others who and also been speaking with him. Essentially you at all been talking about what he told you. These facts will confirm that none of you were independent witnesses of myself but rather independent witnesses of what Douglas weal was saying. Kenneth Miller confirms this under oath So we do not need to bring him from the grave to report what he has heard in order to say to others including the ACC.
You acknowledge that you are not qualified to comment on what Douglas Wheeler told you yet the evidences that you told others and the ACC anyway regardless as to whether or not what you are saying was true or a lie. The way in which you presented it to the ACC was in a manner as if it was true which is the reason they became terrorised and launched an investigation. Interestingly the ACC did not go back to you to verify what you had said nor brought you into court themselves. Why not? Obviously we now have an elephant in the room.

I never passed any opinions about Douglas we'll. Far from it I just refuted his along with refuting his followers such as yourself 24 seven as you say.
It is not defamation of character to refute the allegations of others particularly when the likes of yourself confirm that you have no original information of any sort To support the allegations against me.

Your recordings.
Haha there
You got what you deserved in those
Fuk with others then your fucked with
Couldn’t care less what you have
In court your fucked Thomas
That’s where you won’t get away with your trickery questioning designed to get the answer you need
That’s very clear what you did
All been gone thru by the experts
0

#42 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 12:05 PM

View PostHemi, on 29 October 2019 - 06:10 PM, said:

v
The Fitzi is indeed information Thomas
Plenty of it as you know.

Douglas Weal sent The Fitzi File containing the ACC Bomb Plot as a section within the Fitzi File
That was received by ACC 9th February 2008. Passed to the Police 11th February 2008.
B)/>/>/>



View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 11:05 AM, said:

WRONG
The first exhibits titled number one exhibit was the document produced by you as an email sent to the ACC. The ACC staff member entered the exhibit into court as an exhibit that initiated them being terrorised..
As you can appreciate it as an official court document and court record that you have produced a document for the purposes of terrorising the ACC. The only question of fact is whether or not what you were saying was true. As you had never had any connection with myself for the purposes of reaching any conclusions reported by you to the ACC you need to be examined by the court to determine where you acquired your impressions and whether or not you had any reasonable reason to cause the ACC to become terrorised by your document.

We have telephone records of your voice confirming that you obtained all information from Douglas weal and that you had discussed what you heard from him with others who and also been speaking with him. Essentially you at all been talking about what he told you. These facts will confirm that none of you were independent witnesses of myself but rather independent witnesses of what Douglas weal was saying. Kenneth Miller confirms this under oath So we do not need to bring him from the grave to report what he has heard in order to say to others including the ACC.
You acknowledge that you are not qualified to comment on what Douglas Wheeler told you yet the evidences that you told others and the ACC anyway regardless as to whether or not what you are saying was true or a lie. The way in which you presented it to the ACC was in a manner as if it was true which is the reason they became terrorised and launched an investigation. Interestingly the ACC did not go back to you to verify what you had said nor brought you into court themselves. Why not? Obviously we now have an elephant in the room.

I never passed any opinions about Douglas we'll. Far from it I just refuted his along with refuting his followers such as yourself 24 seven as you say.
It is not defamation of character to refute the allegations of others particularly when the likes of yourself confirm that you have no original information of any sort To support the allegations against me.


Viv will put you right Thomas seeing as your unable to comprehend the issue.
0

#43 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10801
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 30 October 2019 - 12:48 PM

View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 11:58 AM, said:

What a load of bollocks
It’s not your imaginations as opinions needed Thomas
I havnt alleged anything.
Based on documentation content informations

Time that you have a serious I chat with Vivienne.


Of course not, you have only repeated Douglas weals allegations for him in the mistaken belief that you will be immune from prosecution. However you did chicken out when it comes time to planting the Fitzy report and an ACC meeting on his behalf while also using a fictitious name. Obviously he didn't want to be prosecuted for terrorism and false allegation of terrorism, he wanted you to take the rap.
There is no content that could be called documentation in the Fitzy report. If you can't see that you must be a complete and utter plonker. Why do you think the police did not submit the Fitzy report to the court for examination?

0

#44 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10801
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 30 October 2019 - 12:51 PM

View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 12:05 PM, said:

Your recordings.
Haha there
You got what you deserved in those
Fuk with others then your fucked with
Couldn’t care less what you have
In court your fucked Thomas
That’s where you won’t get away with your trickery questioning designed to get the answer you need
That’s very clear what you did
All been gone thru by the experts


I'm not seeking any information from you. I just want you to take the information you to surrender to the police all that you have received from Douglas weal concerning terrorism. I'm quite sure the ACC would like to know that they are safe as well. Perhaps you should give the ACC a copy of the Fitzy reportalong with everything else you have received from Douglas weal.
No expert has gone through any exhibit or information of any sort. What on earth gave you that silly idea?

0

#45 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10801
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 30 October 2019 - 12:51 PM

View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 12:05 PM, said:

Viv will put you right Thomas seeing as your unable to comprehend the issue.


Who is Viv?
0

#46 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 04:49 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 12:51 PM, said:

Who is Viv?

Your barrister.
0

#47 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 04:52 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 12:51 PM, said:

I'm not seeking any information from you. I just want you to take the information you to surrender to the police all that you have received from Douglas weal concerning terrorism. I'm quite sure the ACC would like to know that they are safe as well. Perhaps you should give the ACC a copy of the Fitzy reportalong with everything else you have received from Douglas weal.
No expert has gone through any exhibit or information of any sort. What on earth gave you that silly idea?

You got what you wanted Thomas.
That was done long long ago Thomas
As a point
Only two had content that needed looking at as for terrorism issues that you speak of.
Which were also given to you.

Nothing else to give.
Yes there has been an expert gone thru everything relating to your case Thomas
What gives you the idea it hasn’t??
0

#48 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10801
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 30 October 2019 - 05:54 PM

View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 04:49 PM, said:

Your barrister.


I have never in my life had a barrister by the name of Viv or any derivative thereof
0

#49 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10801
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 30 October 2019 - 05:56 PM

View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 04:52 PM, said:

You got what you wanted Thomas.
That was done long long ago Thomas
As a point
Only two had content that needed looking at as for terrorism issues that you speak of.
Which were also given to you.

Nothing else to give.
Yes there has been an expert gone thru everything relating to your case Thomas
What gives you the idea it hasn’t??


The documents in your possession have never been presented in court.
As I have an entitlement for a defence by way of all defence exhibits possible and that you had colluded with others to prevent that from happening you will be given the opportunity very soon to make a presentation and explain yourself. it is my guess that you are going to be and a truckload of trouble for your part in denying me an adequate defence

It is not for you to have an opinion about the merits of either the documents or the nature of my defence.
Your grammar is so bad I cannot understand what you are trying to say in the last few sentences.

0

#50 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:37 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 05:54 PM, said:

I have never in my life had a barrister by the name of Viv or any derivative thereof

So who did you have as a barrister then on the bomb plot.
0

#51 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:41 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 05:56 PM, said:

The documents in your possession have never been presented in court.
As I have an entitlement for a defence by way of all defence exhibits possible and that you had colluded with others to prevent that from happening you will be given the opportunity very soon to make a presentation and explain yourself. it is my guess that you are going to be and a truckload of trouble for your part in denying me an adequate defence

It is not for you to have an opinion about the merits of either the documents or the nature of my defence.
Your grammar is so bad I cannot understand what you are trying to say in the last few sentences.

I couldn’t give a toss that anything I may or may not have had as being relevant was presented to the courts Thomas
That was your choice to do or not to do
You chose not to.
Waste a time bitching about that now
I’ll explain only one thing
What a complete asshole threatening prick you were and still are to feel with
0

#52 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:43 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 05:56 PM, said:

The documents in your possession have never been presented in court.
As I have an entitlement for a defence by way of all defence exhibits possible and that you had colluded with others to prevent that from happening you will be given the opportunity very soon to make a presentation and explain yourself. it is my guess that you are going to be and a truckload of trouble for your part in denying me an adequate defence

It is not for you to have an opinion about the merits of either the documents or the nature of my defence.
Your grammar is so bad I cannot understand what you are trying to say in the last few sentences.

It is not for you to guess what I may have Thomas
Your on were on collusion from day one
You failed and will fail again there
Your not of knowledge about what you state and accuse if.
0

#53 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:45 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 12:51 PM, said:

Who is Viv?



View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 04:49 PM, said:

Your barrister.

What a fuken plonked
Who’s Viv
Your barrister Thomas :lol:
0

#54 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10801
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:57 PM

View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 06:37 PM, said:

So who did you have as a barrister then on the bomb plot.


A male, not a female
0

#55 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10801
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 30 October 2019 - 07:03 PM

View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 06:41 PM, said:

I couldn’t give a toss that anything I may or may not have had as being relevant was presented to the courts Thomas
That was your choice to do or not to do
You chose not to.
Waste a time bitching about that now
I’ll explain only one thing
What a complete asshole threatening prick you were and still are to feel with


Of course you gave a toss. After telling ACC lies and scaring the hell out of them about a bomb plot you then followed through by withholding information from the court that demonstrated that the whole thing was a hoax invented by Douglas weal with is nonsensical ramblings found in the Fitzy report which would have been super easy to demonstrate what a bunch of plonkers you all were. the loony tune evidence of the Fitzy report was clearly evident as to the full nature of the fantasies that you all indulged in. I think the real clue that the Police and ACC should have picked up on was your assertions that I was plotting in my Secret lair. To the Batcave Robin and all such of other ridiculous nonsense.

It was not my choice to endorse your crazy ridiculous behaviour and in particular the evidence of such behaviour. You imagine that we don't know that you are a complete idiot.
It is you that have consistently and persistently attacked along with other members of your lynch mob tagteam that have demonstrated a continuous and uninterrupted compulsive obsessive disorder the likes of which is very rarely ever seen. Who continues in the way that you have for more than a decade? Look at the evidence of your abnormal crazy behaviour patterns!
Time for you to be removed from the community for the safety of the community.

0

#56 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10801
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 30 October 2019 - 07:04 PM

View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 06:43 PM, said:

It is not for you to guess what I may have Thomas
Your on were on collusion from day one
You failed and will fail again there
Your not of knowledge about what you state and accuse if.


In your arrogance you gave a taste of the documents that were available 10 minutes before my lawyer left for the court room which of course you would have been fully aware was just too late.. That is why my lawyer decided to turn against you and have the police pick you up and bring you to the court. The judge ordered so that the police claimed that you didn't want to come. You have never denied being obstructive as the police had painted you in the court.
I have no knowledge of anything and have never claimed to know anything. All I have been doing is denying your ridiculous fantasies.

0

#57 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10801
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 30 October 2019 - 07:05 PM

View PostHemi, on 30 October 2019 - 06:45 PM, said:

What a fuken plonked
Who’s Viv
Your barrister Thomas Posted Image

I have never had a barrister called Viv. This is just further evidence of your out-of-control imagination being perceived by you to be something real.
0

#58 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 07:16 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 05:54 PM, said:

I have never in my life had a barrister by the name of Viv or any derivative thereof



You did

Thats information evidence as Fact.

Your a liar Thomas.
0

#59 User is offline   tommy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1964
  • Joined: 21-September 05

Posted 30 October 2019 - 07:17 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 30 October 2019 - 11:06 AM, said:

Historically no one would be so ridiculously stupid to assert that I ever run away from anything.
However we do notice that bullies frequently call the victim bullies so as to divert attention from themselves.
I cannot be accused of being a bully for defending myself against the likes of yourself.

you suggest "I have ever run away " ,,,,,,,,then such get up to speed and post your where abouts of resolvings these long standing , issues with past personal associations . in a lawfull manner , as opposed to a forum discussion ,,,,, allan ……... :rolleyes:
0

#60 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2622
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 30 October 2019 - 07:19 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 29 October 2019 - 05:33 PM, said:

Drunken recollections is nothing short of imagination and certainly not information.

If you think drunken recollections are information then you are part of the problem.

You passing on wheels drunken recollections to the ACC is defamation of character just like wheel telling you of his drunken recollection.

The police accepted that ACC had carried out an investigation and did not carry one out an investigation of their own. In fact even though the judge ordered the police to continue with their investigation they still did not with the result that you were not brought to the court for Examination.



The only people carrying out an investigation into the nature of my injuries and extent of disability is the treatment providers. ACC had never challenged the medical profession by way of independent medical assessment but rather preferred instead to ignore the medical evidence in favour of their own imagination and imagination of people like you


I have never been examined by the court for no other reason that I am not qualified to give any opinion about the imaginations of Douglas wheel and those who run with them such as yourself or anyone else challenge in the medical profession though not qualified to do so.

I simply rely upon the legislation and the appropriate qualified medical profession



View PostAlan Thomas, on 29 October 2019 - 05:34 PM, said:

You will find that most of the people ranting and raving on the site are illiterate or at best semiliterate along with being simple morons that you would normally find in any lynch mob



View PostAlan Thomas, on 29 October 2019 - 05:37 PM, said:

What information are you claiming that the ACC into the police?
The fancy report most certainly is not information. This is the nature of your problem to the extent that you cannot distinguish the difference between imagination and information. The Fitzy report made no reference to any actual document nor any form of evidence of any sort.

The fact that the Fitzy report was compiled at all demonstrates a level of compulsive obsessive disorder that right-thinking person would have immediately seen for what it was, the work of a lunatic.. The fact that you believed the Fitzy report demonstrates you to be even worse than a lunatic.

0

Share this topic:


  • 14 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users