MINI, on 22 April 2018 - 01:32 PM, said:
I will attack your words of tripe as long as I am here. You state often that Butler/Hemi and I are part of some sort of tagteam, whatever it represents. You say that ACC commission the members Douglas Weal and any tagteam to attack him.
You are walking on quicksand when you state people have conspired to harm you. If all you have as far as I am concerned, is that you think I should have gone to the police as soon as I was told that the email had already gone to sue north of the ACC, without any paperwork to back it up. Then you have said I have withheld information that they were already getting thru ACC. That is a fact. And even though I have never made a conscious decision of talking to the police about you one way or the other, it probably would have been different if I held some type of evidence.
Would you still be thanking me for going to the police and complaining about you doing something of which I Knew nothing, if in face ACC had decided not to take the information to the police to charge you.
I don't thing so. You would have verbally be tearing me to bits. ie What business was it of mine etc etc.
You are a very stupid man and you float very close to a dangerous position of being in my face. And I don't like smelling bad breathe.
Mini
Neither point that I'm at pains to make is that it is not up to you to decide what is evidence and what is not evidence. That is for the police and the courts. Just imagine what the world would be like if individual citizens were to decide what evidence the police were going to have and what they weren't going to have! That is why there are laws that prevent you from deciding such matters. The point that I'm making is that you should have made everything available to the police and answered whatever questions they thought were relevant. That way ever looked like you are provided everything and what the police reported to the courts sounded credible that would be the end of the matter for you. However if anything is missed out or seems to be missed out on a case as serious as this you can guarantee that you would be subpoenaed to the court and asked about the missing information that wasn't provided. So as things stand now with your viewpoints of being able to decide for yourself what the police and court shall have you are guaranteeing that you would be called to the court to surrender the balance.
Keep in mind that it is not up to you to interpret information or prejudge anything as that is not your role in life when it comes to criminal prosecutions.
If the judge or the police found that you were wilfully withholding information it is more likely than not that you would be prosecuted for obstructing justice. If you are acting with a motive to protect Douglas weal or anyone else then there would be an additional charges of conspiracy to make false allegation.
Is not too late, please go to the police.