ACCforum: Benjamin Hinchcliff, DPT, LLB - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Benjamin Hinchcliff, DPT, LLB Specialist ACC Legal Advisor

#1 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:08 PM

Ben Hinchcliffe is based in Auckland But is willing to handle cases throughout the country, particularly those that can be resolved by telecommunications with hearings also by way of telecommunications.

He has started from a medical related background with a Qualification and physiotherapy which led to him being an AACC advisor for a couple of years. He then went on to qualify as a barrister and has been recently admitted to the bar. He states that he specifically studied law to address ACC matters.

Then is willing to work within the framework set up whereby fees are paid by way of regulation but may need to charge for some extras if necessary.

Phone: 022 5400 300
[email protected]
http://www.acclegal.co.nz/ If you need help or an opinion no doubt it would be helpful for people to enter the details into his system so as your essential details together with a summary of the problem are within his system. He offers a free initial consultation.

As always those who put themselves forward as ACC advocates are always welcomed onto the site. Then uses a nom de plume on the site and as such we should respect his privacy which is sometimes necessary within the context of robust discussion about various points of law and suchlike as there may or may not always be agreement. Nonetheless greater clarification is always achieved by such interaction.

Then we wish you well and welcome you in your endeavours to do what you think you can for our peer group.

As always those who have engaged Ben's services feedback is always helpful and welcomed.
Ben there are subsections containing various types of threads with them this site such as interesting caselaw and other sections whereby various sections of the legislation are discussed. No doubt you would like to lead various discussion groups in these sections.

As always the rule is no blatant advertising or even self-promotion to achieve that end but rather as an ordinary fellow member. My observation is those in your position our best to encourage others to express their viewpoint and if you think they are wrong spend a little extra time describing why you think they are wrong rather than just making a proclamation As many have had dealings with other legal counsel who have made very significant errors of law, fact and judgement. My further observation as those who demonstrate clarity of thought, compassion and a free with their advice will gain a good following which will no doubt translated into productive use of your time while still remaining with the rules.
0

#2 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7502
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 23 February 2018 - 11:01 AM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 17 February 2018 - 03:08 PM, said:

Ben Hinchcliffe is based in Auckland But is willing to handle cases throughout the country, particularly those that can be resolved by telecommunications with hearings also by way of telecommunications.

He has started from a medical related background with a Qualification and physiotherapy which led to him being an AACC advisor for a couple of years. He then went on to qualify as a barrister and has been recently admitted to the bar. He states that he specifically studied law to address ACC matters.

Then is willing to work within the framework set up whereby fees are paid by way of regulation but may need to charge for some extras if necessary.

Phone: 022 5400 300
[email protected]
http://www.acclegal.co.nz/ If you need help or an opinion no doubt it would be helpful for people to enter the details into his system so as your essential details together with a summary of the problem are within his system. He offers a free initial consultation.

As always those who put themselves forward as ACC advocates are always welcomed onto the site. Then uses a nom de plume on the site and as such we should respect his privacy which is sometimes necessary within the context of robust discussion about various points of law and suchlike as there may or may not always be agreement. Nonetheless greater clarification is always achieved by such interaction.

Then we wish you well and welcome you in your endeavours to do what you think you can for our peer group.

As always those who have engaged Ben's services feedback is always helpful and welcomed.
Ben there are subsections containing various types of threads with them this site such as interesting caselaw and other sections whereby various sections of the legislation are discussed. No doubt you would like to lead various discussion groups in these sections.

As always the rule is no blatant advertising or even self-promotion to achieve that end but rather as an ordinary fellow member. My observation is those in your position our best to encourage others to express their viewpoint and if you think they are wrong spend a little extra time describing why you think they are wrong rather than just making a proclamation As many have had dealings with other legal counsel who have made very significant errors of law, fact and judgement. My further observation as those who demonstrate clarity of thought, compassion and a free with their advice will gain a good following which will no doubt translated into productive use of your time while still remaining with the rules.


A hotmail address for someone we are expected to pay money too? You must be joking. Any above board honest person is going to make himself known and above board, with address. more than cellphone for contact etc. After all if someone was to look hard enough they could get all those things about me and I don't even tote for business.. so much for ACCforum and it clean image.

It could be you by another name or even Grant.

MINI
0

#3 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 23 February 2018 - 01:11 PM

Mini please respect the rights of Benjamin Hinchcliff, DPT, LLB Specialist ACC Legal Advisor To pursue this chosen profession.

I think you will agree that it is not everyday that someone who is changing career from calling himself a doctor to a lawyer specialising ACC matters becomes available for assisting claimants.

Mini guessing and speculating is not information.

If you want to post actual information about this legal professional you should research the fellow so you can be in a position to make any form of comment. Until then you are behaving in the fashion of a member of the tagteam who imagines all sorts of things and then post their speculations as fact which is not helpful for anybody and damages the integrity of the site.

0

#4 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7502
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:42 AM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 23 February 2018 - 01:11 PM, said:

Mini please respect the rights of Benjamin Hinchcliff, DPT, LLB Specialist ACC Legal Advisor To pursue this chosen profession.

I think you will agree that it is not everyday that someone who is changing career from calling himself a doctor to a lawyer specialising ACC matters becomes available for assisting claimants.

Mini guessing and speculating is not information.

If you want to post actual information about this legal professional you should research the fellow so you can be in a position to make any form of comment. Until then you are behaving in the fashion of a member of the tagteam who imagines all sorts of things and then post their speculations as fact which is not helpful for anybody and damages the integrity of the site.


Thomas

You called me a member of the tagteam from the date you knew LF had put my details including my house photo and address and threatened to send someones to harm me. Along with that they and you called me a conspirator to your home detention with the police and ACC. You cant call me anything to do with your arrest for fraud of ACC, because I didn't know you then. Alas it was my seriously needy self that joined this site in 2003/04, not knowing that you were such a dishonest person. So why is it you don't expect me to act as part of the so-called tagteam. (if any)?

You call a person a pig long enough they will start grunting at you.

Mini
2

#5 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 24 February 2018 - 09:58 AM

View PostMINI, on 24 February 2018 - 08:42 AM, said:

Thomas

You called me a member of the tagteam from the date you knew LF had put my details including my house photo and address and threatened to send someones to harm me. Along with that they and you called me a conspirator to your home detention with the police and ACC. You cant call me anything to do with your arrest for fraud of ACC, because I didn't know you then. Alas it was my seriously needy self that joined this site in 2003/04, not knowing that you were such a dishonest person. So why is it you don't expect me to act as part of the so-called tagteam. (if any)?

You call a person a pig long enough they will start grunting at you.

Mini


REPORTED

Off topic

Mini Why would you sabotage someone's thread?
Mini please stop destroying a highly respected doctor and lawyer's post describing how we might help or otherwise claimants and members needing such help as he is capable of providing.

0

#6 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7502
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 25 February 2018 - 08:57 AM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 24 February 2018 - 09:58 AM, said:

REPORTED

Off topic

Mini Why would you sabotage someone's thread?
Mini please stop destroying a highly respected doctor and lawyer's post describing how we might help or otherwise claimants and members needing such help as he is capable of providing.


Thomas

Just as you and anybody can find me easily, I too should be able to find them easily if they are up front with home address or office address. You know how easily it is to have more than one address, you were jailed for using such tactics against ACC.

Mini
1

#7 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 25 February 2018 - 01:53 PM

View PostMINI, on 25 February 2018 - 08:57 AM, said:

Thomas

Just as you and anybody can find me easily, I too should be able to find them easily if they are up front with home address or office address. You know how easily it is to have more than one address, you were jailed for using such tactics against ACC.

Mini


I don't think Benjamin Hinchcliffe's address is any more of interest to anyone and neither does anyone have a right to such information just as the ACC do not have a right to know my address As some information is nobody's business as they do not have a reason to have such information. Mini if you want to talk about me you need to do so on my thread.
0

#8 User is offline   doppelganger 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1699
  • Joined: 19-September 03

Posted 26 February 2018 - 04:36 PM

Why don't you Allan Thomas tell the whole truth

This is on his web site

Quote

As a previous ACC clinical advisor, I saw the challenges faced by New Zealanders dealing with ACC's systems. I obtained my law degree to specifically help New Zealanders receive their due benefits under the ACC scheme.


Bet he did not know the Act when a clinical advisor and more than likely he is wanting to be paid by ACC when he was questioned by ACC when making decisions or giving out advice.
0

#9 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 26 February 2018 - 05:43 PM

View Postdoppelganger, on 26 February 2018 - 04:36 PM, said:

Why don't you Allan Thomas tell the whole truth

This is on his web site



Bet he did not know the Act when a clinical advisor and more than likely he is wanting to be paid by ACC when he was questioned by ACC when making decisions or giving out advice.


Doppelgänger I don't know where you are quoting from but I said
"He has started from a medical related background with a Qualification and physiotherapy which led to him being an AACC advisor for a couple of years. He then went on to qualify as a barrister and has been recently admitted to the bar. He states that he specifically studied law to address ACC matters."
So doppelgänger what are you claiming I'm not telling the truth about?
You then go on to speculate what type of relationship he had with the ACC which is absolutely nothing to do with me and something you should be asking him about, not me. Why do you try to make me responsible for something you are imagining?
0

#10 User is offline   greg 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1159
  • Joined: 15-September 03

Posted 26 February 2018 - 07:43 PM

View Postdoppelganger, on 26 February 2018 - 04:36 PM, said:

Why don't you Allan Thomas tell the whole truth

This is on his web site



Bet he did not know the Act when a clinical advisor and more than likely he is wanting to be paid by ACC when he was questioned by ACC when making decisions or giving out advice.



Is this the same person , Mr Thomas is referring to , as he has been unreliable
in the past.??
0

#11 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 26 February 2018 - 08:04 PM

I don't know this person who has set up business to provide legal support for ACC claimants.

Perhaps those who do know the fellow can provide this site with their impressions.
0

#12 User is offline   doppelganger 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1699
  • Joined: 19-September 03

Posted 26 February 2018 - 10:18 PM

this is from the web site that you got his name and address from

you failed to state.

Quote

As a previous ACC clinical advisor, I saw the challenges faced by New Zealanders dealing with ACC's systems. I obtained my law degree to specifically help New Zealanders receive their due benefits under the ACC scheme.


There is nothing about two years infact there is no time period quoted.

If he sees ACC staff not applying legislation then he had a duty to have those errors corrected.
0

#13 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1650
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 27 February 2018 - 07:42 AM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 26 February 2018 - 08:04 PM, said:

I don't know this person who has set up business to provide legal support for ACC claimants.

Perhaps those who do know the fellow can provide this site with their impressions.


You dont know this person?? what th F"?
YET YOU BLATANTLY advertise this person as one for acc claimants to go to with what are always complicated legal matters within their acc case management issues.
One would have thought that you would have done some homework YOURSELF before advertising an unknown person and instead of asking others for impressions ,Fronted up and given your own in a more detailed appraisal of the person you advertised.
Just more of your usual behaviour in and out of here promoting WHAT YOU DONT KNOW OF trying to lead others into the same load of crap you have been in with the ACC ,for 30 years
3

#14 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 27 February 2018 - 09:02 AM

View Postdoppelganger, on 26 February 2018 - 10:18 PM, said:

this is from the web site that you got his name and address from

you failed to state.

There is nothing about two years infact there is no time period quoted.

If he sees ACC staff not applying legislation then he had a duty to have those errors corrected.


Why don't you ring him up and ask him?
0

#15 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 27 February 2018 - 09:03 AM

View PostHemi, on 27 February 2018 - 07:42 AM, said:

You dont know this person?? what th F"?
YET YOU BLATANTLY advertise this person as one for acc claimants to go to with what are always complicated legal matters within their acc case management issues.
One would have thought that you would have done some homework YOURSELF before advertising an unknown person and instead of asking others for impressions ,Fronted up and given your own in a more detailed appraisal of the person you advertised.
Just more of your usual behaviour in and out of here promoting WHAT YOU DONT KNOW OF trying to lead others into the same load of crap you have been in with the ACC ,for 30 years


It is hoped that every individual putting themselves forward as an ACC a advocate will be listed in this section together with the comments of those who have had dealings with the individuals.
0

#16 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1650
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 27 February 2018 - 10:40 AM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 27 February 2018 - 09:03 AM, said:

It is hoped that every individual putting themselves forward as an ACC a advocate will be listed in this section together with the comments of those who have had dealings with the individuals.


COOL


Alan Thomas.

Noted as when attempting to represent claimant was not recognised as an advocate / and or support person
so therefore ,one must take it that as Mr Thomas has been refused the /any ability to represent claimant/s in case management / review matters etc etc or deal with acc directly for claimants it should be so noted in this section / list of those putting themselves forward along with any appropriate comments.
0

#17 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 27 February 2018 - 12:13 PM

View PostHemi, on 27 February 2018 - 10:40 AM, said:

COOL


Alan Thomas.

Noted as when attempting to represent claimant was not recognised as an advocate / and or support person
so therefore ,one must take it that as Mr Thomas has been refused the /any ability to represent claimant/s in case management / review matters etc etc or deal with acc directly for claimants it should be so noted in this section / list of those putting themselves forward along with any appropriate comments.


This section has always been set up for providing a list of advocacy resources together with claimant comments concerning those advocates.

This does not undermine the rule that advocates may not use this site for general self-promotion or for touting business.

You need to keep in mind that this Section of the site is in the interests of claimants needing help and where to get that help as opposed to a business resource for those giving it.
0

#18 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1650
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 28 February 2018 - 07:56 AM

View PostHemi, on 27 February 2018 - 10:40 AM, said:

COOL


Alan Thomas.

Noted as when attempting to represent claimant was not recognised as an advocate / and or support person
so therefore ,one must take it that as Mr Thomas has been refused the /any ability to represent claimant/s in case management / review matters etc etc or deal with acc directly for claimants it should be so noted in this section / list of those putting themselves forward along with any appropriate comments.



View PostAlan Thomas, on 27 February 2018 - 12:13 PM, said:

This section has always been set up for providing a list of advocacy resources together with claimant comments concerning those advocates.

This does not undermine the rule that advocates may not use this site for general self-promotion or for touting business.

You need to keep in mind that this Section of the site is in the interests of claimants needing help and where to get that help as opposed to a business resource for those giving it.


YOU Thomas NEED to keep in mind that the section here and the site itself tho here to assist others, is here to also warn others of ones such as you that are not able to represent claimants but make out you are the expert and lead others to your ,what to date show as very unsuccessful /fraudulent acc benefit claims ,and of attempting to cause great bodily harm to acc staff acc claimants and the general public,to which just your name alone involved with any acc claimant or their case claims leaves them on a road to nowhere at day one,
It is also of note that you Thomas being self publicised as such ,are not the owner nor administrator nor rule maker of this site and have no rights to order as you do other members to do as you state/want to achieve a very low key public persona of yourself so you can sit out here, PROMOTING YOURSELF as the self alleged Messiah of all things ACC
Which of course all can see is just a fallacy and a very self imaginative showing of yourself NOT AS YOU REALLY ARE.

Bugger off and stop trying to be the rule maker of the site WHICH YOU ARE NOT
Your continued reporting of posts you dont like, make you publicly look like a wee kid in a sandpit with no toys to pay with Posted Image/> >> In reality a ''CYBER BULLY''<<known as Alan Thomas.
0

#19 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9051
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 28 February 2018 - 04:17 PM

Hemi I have reported you for being off topic in as much as you have indulged in attack against someone other than individual described on the topic of the thread whereby you may take advantage of the opportunity to describe the good and the bad about that individual.

Incidentally where in your wildest dreams did you imagine I was never the rule maker of the site?
0

#20 User is offline   Hemi 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1650
  • Joined: 05-January 12

Posted 28 February 2018 - 06:34 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 28 February 2018 - 04:17 PM, said:

Hemi I have reported you for being off topic in as much as you have indulged in attack against someone other than individual described on the topic of the thread whereby you may take advantage of the opportunity to describe the good and the bad about that individual.

Incidentally where in your wildest dreams did you imagine I was never the rule maker of the site?

No attack
its fact and you asked for info on such matters and comments to
WHICH YOU GOT ;)/>

So you ask where did i imagine you were never the rule maker of this site
no imagine there THOMAS-The owners make the rules.
but as an intruder /bully /nincompoop -you are well known to push your own rules at others ,appearing as some sort of quasi-autonomous organisation back door rule maker in here
However
YOU state you are NOT the owner of this site and have no access nor anything to do with running the site
As the one who advised me that they were the owners and stated you Thomas HAD -NO SAY in the running nor operations of the site then your statements are true -YOU DONT OWN RUN OPERATE THE SITE
So Thomas
UNLESS the one who i know as the owner informs me personally ,otherwise to that ,>that the site is yours alone to run operate make the rules then your just another member who has no authority over other members.
You can of course publish that you have rightful ownership or access to and approval of the owners to make the rules and run the site-otherwise
PISS OFF and stop being a bully and let the site run as it should without your continual starting up threads/commenting in threads all designed by your wordsmithing, to inflame an argument so you can play reporting boy :lol:/>
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users