ACCforum: ACC REFORM ??? - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 7 Pages +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ACC REFORM ??? NZ FIRST recognise serious problems with ACC

#121 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted 20 May 2017 - 11:12 AM

The irony being of course that while ACC has stripped us of $33 billion in money that would've otherwise gone to surgery and returning people back to their prior health [post injury], on the other side of the coin we probably have 2000 long term ACC career professionals in this country who are taking ACC for all it is worth having found many loopholes in current legislation and sharing that knowledge between their sub-criminal society.

Even one such 23 year claimant brags about her study of ACC law in achieving that end.

Such fine individuals they are.
0

#122 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 20 May 2017 - 11:18 AM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 20 May 2017 - 11:12 AM, said:

The irony being of course that while ACC has stripped us of $33 billion in money that would've otherwise gone to surgery and returning people back to their prior health [post injury], on the other side of the coin we probably have 2000 long term ACC career professionals in this country who are taking ACC for all it is worth having found many loopholes in current legislation and sharing that knowledge between their sub-criminal society.

Even one such 23 year claimant brags about her study of ACC law in achieving that end.

Such fine individuals they are.


Some one who studies law in order to achieve justice is indeed a fine individual, you however just bitching and moaning and trolling will achieve nothing.

Colin Wightman you are just a loser, and always will be.




This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.







You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.





0

#123 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted 20 May 2017 - 01:08 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 20 May 2017 - 11:12 AM, said:

The irony being of course that while ACC has stripped us of $33 billion in money that would've otherwise gone to surgery and returning people back to their prior health [post injury], on the other side of the coin we probably have 2000 long term ACC career professionals in this country who are taking ACC for all it is worth having found many loopholes in current legislation and sharing that knowledge between their sub-criminal society.

Even one such 23 year claimant brags about her study of ACC law in achieving that end.

Such fine individuals they are.


While the boyfriend above has a record spanning 30 years of trying for benefit dependency instead of adapting and getting a real job.
0

#124 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 20 May 2017 - 02:01 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 20 May 2017 - 01:08 PM, said:

While the boyfriend above has a record spanning 30 years of trying for benefit dependency instead of adapting and getting a real job.


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.







You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#125 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted 20 May 2017 - 03:27 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 20 May 2017 - 01:08 PM, said:

While the boyfriend above has a record spanning 30 years of trying for benefit dependency instead of adapting and getting a real job.


Pretty much like the rest of the RAT-PACK.
0

#126 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 20 May 2017 - 04:25 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 20 May 2017 - 03:27 PM, said:

Pretty much like the rest of the RAT-PACK.


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.







You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#127 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted 22 May 2017 - 01:29 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 20 May 2017 - 01:08 PM, said:

While the boyfriend above has a record spanning 30 years of trying for benefit dependency instead of adapting and getting a real job.


Even more amusing that these ACC career professionals feel justified in studying law to out-play ACC at their own game.

They call it seeking 'justice'.

Hilarious.
0

#128 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 22 May 2017 - 01:30 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 22 May 2017 - 01:29 PM, said:

Even more amusing that these ACC career professionals feel justified in studying law to out-play ACC at their own game.

They call it seeking 'justice'.

Hilarious.


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.







You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#129 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted 22 May 2017 - 03:57 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 22 May 2017 - 01:29 PM, said:

Even more amusing that these ACC career professionals feel justified in studying law to out-play ACC at their own game.

They call it seeking 'justice'.

Hilarious.


So hilarious that the one above has been fighting ACC for over 3 decades for any number of "accidents".
0

#130 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8087
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 22 May 2017 - 05:55 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 22 May 2017 - 01:29 PM, said:

Even more amusing that these ACC career professionals feel justified in studying law to out-play ACC at their own game.

They call it seeking 'justice'.

Hilarious.



Their knowledge when combined is less than I know as one person who has not "studied" law but who has a natural aptitude to comprehend law. It is that which they are missing. The ability to simply comprehend what it is the law writers intended.

0

#131 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 22 May 2017 - 06:10 PM

View PostBattleaxe, on 22 May 2017 - 05:55 PM, said:



Their knowledge when combined is less than I know as one person who has not "studied" law but who has a natural aptitude to comprehend law. It is that which they are missing. The ability to simply comprehend what it is the law writers intended.



This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.







You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#132 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8087
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 22 May 2017 - 06:12 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 22 May 2017 - 03:57 PM, said:

So hilarious that the one above has been fighting ACC for over 3 decades for any number of "accidents".





Almost a career.
0

#133 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 23 May 2017 - 07:51 AM

This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.







You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#134 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted 23 May 2017 - 08:19 AM

View PostBattleaxe, on 22 May 2017 - 06:12 PM, said:



Almost a career.


When you look around some of his cyber-space friends [even allowing for the multi-heads], most of them have ACC careers or WINZ careers spanning 2 and 3 decades.
0

#135 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 23 May 2017 - 08:22 AM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 23 May 2017 - 08:19 AM, said:

When you look around some of his cyber-space friends [even allowing for the multi-heads], most of them have ACC careers or WINZ careers spanning 2 and 3 decades.


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.







You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#136 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted 23 May 2017 - 01:48 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 23 May 2017 - 08:19 AM, said:

When you look around some of his cyber-space friends [even allowing for the multi-heads], most of them have ACC careers or WINZ careers spanning 2 and 3 decades.


No exception above.
0

Share this topic:


  • 7 Pages +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users