[tommy]

hand braking , as you described , inter can be a procedure acc utilize , , and if the claimant then wants to be informed of the corporations progress , request , an updated file report , or you may request a full file report

[MontyP]

I agree.
Thats well known among various doctors I have dealt with. Its not right but ACC does revoke cover wrongfully and so the claimants must fight to be reinstated.

not their victim, on 04 May 2017 - 07:52 AM, said:

QUITE SIMPLY

ACC CANNOT REVOKE COVER UNLESS


THE INJURY IS NOT AS ITS SAID TO BE

THE MEDICAL EVIDENCE DOES NOT MATCH THE INJURY STATUS

OR

COVER CAN BE PERMANENTLY REVOKED FOR THOSE WHO HAVE DEFRAUDED THE CORPORATION

MUCH LIKE THE CRIMES ACT...

YOU HAVE NO ENTITLEMENT

IF YOUR INJURIES ARE FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED AND

YOU CLAIM INCAPACITY WHEN IN FACT YOU ARE ABLE TO USE THE INJURED AREA....

:

[INTER]

12 Mths Later The End Is In Sight, the going round in circles is nearly finished :

taken 12 mths to get back to where we started, And Have Started Again At The Beginning using the appropriate cover act of injury.

72/ Act.

[MINI]

INTER, on 16 July 2017 - 10:39 PM, said:

YEP and my reply was

I Asked For Decisions to be reviewed And Issue A Revised Decision / section 390 Decision.
NOT The ::::::::****** opinion::::::::::

Think after that t i got no reply

hard to keep track as so much back and forth going no where ( but think i never got a reply )

Section 134 Who may apply for review. Read it see if it means what this Decisions is about.

Let us know. Be Quick cause you only got 3 months I think it is.

Mini