ACCforum: MEDIA: DONT FOLLOW THIS - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 378 Pages +
  • « First
  • 376
  • 377
  • 378
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

MEDIA: DONT FOLLOW THIS

#7541 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8087
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted Yesterday, 01:01 PM


I read this news story today - http://www.stuff.co....shing-his-shift - and it stood out to me once again how the ACC calls claimants and gives them decisions over the phone. This was also a theme when reading the comments under the article.

In my experienced, honest and genuine opinion, every ACC claimant with an injury that is likely to require surgery of any sort, and/or that is serious or complex in nature, should not talk to the ACC. That is unless they tape record each and every call you make, and receive from, the ACC. Indeed, if I could go back to the day my file was submitted by my G.P. to the ACC, and knowing what I know now about the ACC's employees and their conduct, I would have returned home and immediately, and sat down in front of my computer to send an e-mailed formal letter to the ACC advising it that I did not want to communicate with any of its employees verbally, and, that it needed to communicate with me strictly in writing. I would also have submitted my "limited authority" earlier than I did which made it illegal for the ACC to share my personal and identifying information with anyone external to this organisation (refer the D Powell v ACC decision).

Why? Well quite simply, and in my experienced, honest and genuine opinion, most of their employees are economic with the truth, and when the 'chips are down' they will deny, deny, deny that they said what you know very well they said. In other words, I will never again trust any ACC employee as in my experienced, honest and genuine opinion they simply cannot be trusted.

ACC will of course resist being required to put everything in writing, but it is your right to choose how they communicate with you, and if you are going to stand any chance of succeeding against a declined cover or entitlements decision, this simple action is critical to that happening.

0

#7542 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8087
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted Yesterday, 01:02 PM

View PostBrucey, on 25 May 2017 - 11:31 AM, said:

More filthy lies from the troll Lianne Mylie.

0

#7543 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8087
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted Yesterday, 01:02 PM

View PostBrucey, on 25 May 2017 - 11:31 AM, said:

More filthy lies from the troll Lianne Mylie.







Brucey
Posted Today, 12:31 PM

Posted ImageBattleaxe, on 24 May 2017 - 11:15 PM, said:




TO ANONYMOUSEY:

My honest and genuine opinion of you for a long time has been that you are no different to the other "TrollWatch" members, and what I learnt about you tonight confirmed this for me.


I had noticed that you have been quiet in recent days and I honesty and genuinely believed that you had come to your senses and that you had made a wise decision to stay away from the forum for good. How wrong I was proved to be with the realisation that all the while behind the scenes you, and I believe Bruce too, were apparently busy plotting your next devious move.


With the emergence of the new ''' moniker which involved a change from the previous tuffstuff moniker (at 01:03 AM on 22/5/2017), and which I honestly and genuinely continue to believe Bruce was responsible for, or at the very least involved in, it was noted by me that 12 hours later to the minute (at 01:03 PM on 23/5/2017) you and/or Bruce changed your anonymousey moniker to '''', and, that at 12:50 PM today, you and/or Bruce then changed that to the new xxxxx moniker.

To lay it out simply for readers:

tuffstuff moniker ---> ''' moniker at 01:03 AM on 22/5/2017
anonymousey moniker ---> '''' moniker at 01:03 PM on 23/5/2017
'''' moniker ---> xxxxx moniker at 12:05 PM on 24/5/2017.


It is further noted when looking at the new xxxxx moniker content, that you and/or Bruce have deleted at least 30 messages. This was a pointless exercise and futile waste of time as I have electronic and hard copies of all messages posted to the forum.


Knowing as you irrefutably do that legal action is going to be taken by me against the "TrollWatch" group and certain other members of the forum, and that the records of the forum are all subject to the relevant statutory provisions and court rules of evidence, I am advising you now that you have not helped yourself by tampering with and deleting forum records. The same goes for Huggy and IhateACC who have acted in like fashion.


It is also my honest and genuine opinion that no Judge will ignore, and much less accept, the above stated actions having been taken without intent and purpose, not forgetting the glaringly obvious elements of dishonesty and unlawfulness.




More filthy lies from the troll Lianne Mylie.


"Can justice and ACC live symbiotically, or are justice and accident compensation forever an oxymoron" Malcolm Hood.

0

#7544 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted Yesterday, 01:44 PM

View PostBattleaxe, on 25 May 2017 - 01:02 PM, said:

Brucey
Posted Today, 12:31 PM

Posted ImageBattleaxe, on 24 May 2017 - 11:15 PM, said:




TO ANONYMOUSEY:

My honest and genuine opinion of you for a long time has been that you are no different to the other "TrollWatch" members, and what I learnt about you tonight confirmed this for me.


I had noticed that you have been quiet in recent days and I honesty and genuinely believed that you had come to your senses and that you had made a wise decision to stay away from the forum for good. How wrong I was proved to be with the realisation that all the while behind the scenes you, and I believe Bruce too, were apparently busy plotting your next devious move.


With the emergence of the new ''' moniker which involved a change from the previous tuffstuff moniker (at 01:03 AM on 22/5/2017), and which I honestly and genuinely continue to believe Bruce was responsible for, or at the very least involved in, it was noted by me that 12 hours later to the minute (at 01:03 PM on 23/5/2017) you and/or Bruce changed your anonymousey moniker to '''', and, that at 12:50 PM today, you and/or Bruce then changed that to the new xxxxx moniker.

To lay it out simply for readers:

tuffstuff moniker ---> ''' moniker at 01:03 AM on 22/5/2017
anonymousey moniker ---> '''' moniker at 01:03 PM on 23/5/2017
'''' moniker ---> xxxxx moniker at 12:05 PM on 24/5/2017.


It is further noted when looking at the new xxxxx moniker content, that you and/or Bruce have deleted at least 30 messages. This was a pointless exercise and futile waste of time as I have electronic and hard copies of all messages posted to the forum.


Knowing as you irrefutably do that legal action is going to be taken by me against the "TrollWatch" group and certain other members of the forum, and that the records of the forum are all subject to the relevant statutory provisions and court rules of evidence, I am advising you now that you have not helped yourself by tampering with and deleting forum records. The same goes for Huggy and IhateACC who have acted in like fashion.


It is also my honest and genuine opinion that no Judge will ignore, and much less accept, the above stated actions having been taken without intent and purpose, not forgetting the glaringly obvious elements of dishonesty and unlawfulness.




More filthy lies from the troll Lianne Mylie.


"Can justice and ACC live symbiotically, or are justice and accident compensation forever an oxymoron" Malcolm Hood.






Troll Queen Lianne Mylie, filthy lying bitch.

Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


Colin Wightman and Lianne Mylie spend all there time on this forum attacking people who have taken on ACC and won, when they themselves have not achieved anything.

They attack those that have at great personal cost to themselves and their families taken on the beast won, what have often been long and protracted battles.

These people continue in the best interest of justice to help others in similar situations, spending a lot of energy and personal time doing so.

These two trolls just bitch and moan about ACC, and attack harass and defame the people involved in the real fight.

I wonder what motivates them, money perhaps, they might be on the ACC payroll maybe.



This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.

And the following bullshit below, which is on her signature, so shows every time she posts.


Bruce threatened me with bodily harm on 18 and 19 May 2017. He wrote; "I only have the one membership, I have only ever had the one membership, you have no evidence at all to prove the lie you are putting forward, it is no different to the many previous lies you have told, and if you continue to travel down this path of persistent stalking and trouble making, it will end badly for you" (my use of underlining).
Mini also threatened me with bodily harm on 18 May 2017. She wrote; "Be very careful they don't come looking for you."
This message has been added at 8.20 p.m. on 19/5/2017 and is a record that may be referred to should anything "untoward" happen to me.



You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.












0

#7545 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted Yesterday, 01:49 PM

View PostBattleaxe, on 25 May 2017 - 01:01 PM, said:


I read this news story today - http://www.stuff.co....shing-his-shift - and it stood out to me once again how the ACC calls claimants and gives them decisions over the phone. This was also a theme when reading the comments under the article.

In my experienced, honest and genuine opinion, every ACC claimant with an injury that is likely to require surgery of any sort, and/or that is serious or complex in nature, should not talk to the ACC. That is unless they tape record each and every call you make, and receive from, the ACC. Indeed, if I could go back to the day my file was submitted by my G.P. to the ACC, and knowing what I know now about the ACC's employees and their conduct, I would have returned home and immediately, and sat down in front of my computer to send an e-mailed formal letter to the ACC advising it that I did not want to communicate with any of its employees verbally, and, that it needed to communicate with me strictly in writing. I would also have submitted my "limited authority" earlier than I did which made it illegal for the ACC to share my personal and identifying information with anyone external to this organisation (refer the D Powell v ACC decision).

Why? Well quite simply, and in my experienced, honest and genuine opinion, most of their employees are economic with the truth, and when the 'chips are down' they will deny, deny, deny that they said what you know very well they said. In other words, I will never again trust any ACC employee as in my experienced, honest and genuine opinion they simply cannot be trusted.

ACC will of course resist being required to put everything in writing, but it is your right to choose how they communicate with you, and if you are going to stand any chance of succeeding against a declined cover or entitlements decision, this simple action is critical to that happening.



Absolutely right.

I've heard of one case where they will accuse someone of threatening someone within the ACC structure which was not only unproven, not evidenced, but a downright rotten lie.

They then transferred that person to the REMOTES UNIT as a means of intimidating him/her, limiting their ability to deal with the dodgy behaviours within, while in breach of COURT orders and a decision made against them by their own friends, FAIRWAY RESOLUTION.

Their word is worth nothing.
0

#7546 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted Yesterday, 01:50 PM

And yes, from my own experiences, ACC and their ACCREDITED AGENTS are trained to cheat & lie.

Even their lawyers are no better.
0

#7547 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted Yesterday, 01:50 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 25 May 2017 - 01:50 PM, said:

And yes, from my own experiences, ACC and their ACCREDITED AGENTS are trained to cheat & lie.

Even their lawyers are no better.


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


Colin Wightman and Lianne Mylie spend all there time on this forum attacking people who have taken on ACC and won, when they themselves have not achieved anything.

They attack those that have at great personal cost to themselves and their families taken on the beast won, what have often been long and protracted battles.

These people continue in the best interest of justice to help others in similar situations, spending a lot of energy and personal time doing so.

These two trolls just bitch and moan about ACC, and attack harass and defame the people involved in the real fight.

I wonder what motivates them, money perhaps, they might be on the ACC payroll maybe.



This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.

And the following bullshit below, which is on her signature, so shows every time she posts.


Bruce threatened me with bodily harm on 18 and 19 May 2017. He wrote; "I only have the one membership, I have only ever had the one membership, you have no evidence at all to prove the lie you are putting forward, it is no different to the many previous lies you have told, and if you continue to travel down this path of persistent stalking and trouble making, it will end badly for you" (my use of underlining).
Mini also threatened me with bodily harm on 18 May 2017. She wrote; "Be very careful they don't come looking for you."
This message has been added at 8.20 p.m. on 19/5/2017 and is a record that may be referred to should anything "untoward" happen to me.



You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#7548 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted Yesterday, 01:55 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 25 May 2017 - 01:49 PM, said:

Absolutely right.

I've heard of one case where they will accuse someone of threatening someone within the ACC structure which was not only unproven, not evidenced, but a downright rotten lie.

They then transferred that person to the REMOTES UNIT as a means of intimidating him/her, limiting their ability to deal with the dodgy behaviours within, while in breach of COURT orders and a decision made against them by their own friends, FAIRWAY RESOLUTION.

Their word is worth nothing.


The best advice to any CLAIMANT, ask for anything they say [ACC or their representatives including doctors] in writing.
0

#7549 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted Yesterday, 01:55 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 25 May 2017 - 01:55 PM, said:

The best advice to any CLAIMANT, ask for anything they say [ACC or their representatives including doctors] in writing.


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


Colin Wightman and Lianne Mylie spend all there time on this forum attacking people who have taken on ACC and won, when they themselves have not achieved anything.

They attack those that have at great personal cost to themselves and their families taken on the beast won, what have often been long and protracted battles.

These people continue in the best interest of justice to help others in similar situations, spending a lot of energy and personal time doing so.

These two trolls just bitch and moan about ACC, and attack harass and defame the people involved in the real fight.

I wonder what motivates them, money perhaps, they might be on the ACC payroll maybe.



This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.

And the following bullshit below, which is on her signature, so shows every time she posts.


Bruce threatened me with bodily harm on 18 and 19 May 2017. He wrote; "I only have the one membership, I have only ever had the one membership, you have no evidence at all to prove the lie you are putting forward, it is no different to the many previous lies you have told, and if you continue to travel down this path of persistent stalking and trouble making, it will end badly for you" (my use of underlining).
Mini also threatened me with bodily harm on 18 May 2017. She wrote; "Be very careful they don't come looking for you."
This message has been added at 8.20 p.m. on 19/5/2017 and is a record that may be referred to should anything "untoward" happen to me.



You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#7550 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8087
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted Yesterday, 02:08 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 25 May 2017 - 01:55 PM, said:

The best advice to any CLAIMANT, ask for anything they say [ACC or their representatives including doctors] in writing.


The ACC and Fairway like to call claimants because this does not go on the record. And, in my personal experience, if it does go on the record, what is recorded is not what was discussed.


I do not talk to anyone from either of the aforementioned organisations as a matter of principle. If they could be trusted I would. But their management and staff have demonstrated to me many times over that they are not trustworthy, and, that they will and do knowingly, intentionally and purposefully lie. I have a lot of evidence proving this fact.

Indeed, the ACC prefers to conduct its business over the telephone ... a dubious and questionable way for any organisation to communicate with its clients/customers in my honest and genuine opinion, particularly when it comes to the serious issue of personal health and decisions that often are life-altering.

0

#7551 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8087
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted Yesterday, 02:20 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 25 May 2017 - 01:50 PM, said:

And yes, from my own experiences, ACC and their ACCREDITED AGENTS are trained to cheat & lie.

Even their lawyers are no better.



He who Pays the Piper, one of the two Solicitors that the ACC put on to me and my case in particular (with both of them acting dishonestly but the one much more so), was an unashamed twister of the facts and the truth. This man, not unlike the "TrollWatch" members, was another pathological liar in my experienced, honest and genuine opinion. I did not though let him get away with his lies and not only did I write numerous complaints to the District Court but I also challenged his lies head-on in three teleconferences that he and I had with a District Court Judge. I would have complained too to the Law Society and other relevant agencies about his conduct, but I knew this would be a complete and utter waste of my time and other resources since most of these sorts of organisations are set up to protect their members. And in the case of the Privacy Commissioner especially, it is also my experienced, honest and genuine opinion that this office plays the role of 'gate-keeper' for the ACC ... itself breaching the very statutes that were designed and written to protect vulnerable people, like ACC claimants are, against the very type of behaviours displayed by the Privacy Commissioner's staff.

0

#7552 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted Yesterday, 03:28 PM

View PostBattleaxe, on 25 May 2017 - 02:20 PM, said:


He who Pays the Piper, one of the two Solicitors that the ACC put on to me and my case in particular (with both of them acting dishonestly but the one much more so), was an unashamed twister of the facts and the truth. This man, not unlike the "TrollWatch" members, was another pathological liar in my experienced, honest and genuine opinion. I did not though let him get away with his lies and not only did I write numerous complaints to the District Court but I also challenged his lies head-on in three teleconferences that he and I had with a District Court Judge. I would have complained too to the Law Society and other relevant agencies about his conduct, but I knew this would be a complete and utter waste of my time and other resources since most of these sorts of organisations are set up to protect their members. And in the case of the Privacy Commissioner especially, it is also my experienced, honest and genuine opinion that this office plays the role of 'gate-keeper' for the ACC ... itself breaching the very statutes that were designed and written to protect vulnerable people, like ACC claimants are, against the very type of behaviours displayed by the Privacy Commissioner's staff.



There hasn't been a FAIRWAY or DISTRICT COURT hearing that I have attended where the ACC ACCREDITED AGENT or their LAWYER hasn't either told a series of lies, or with-held vital evidence.

If the behaviour of these people was to exist outside the environment of ACC you'd have them for PERJURY and deliberately seeking to bring an injustice.

As I've experienced, it's an industry of cheats, liars and bully's.

Few can [in my opinion] lie straight in bed.
0

#7553 User is offline   greg 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 979
  • Joined: 15-September 03

Posted Yesterday, 03:54 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 25 May 2017 - 03:28 PM, said:

There hasn't been a FAIRWAY or DISTRICT COURT hearing that I have attended where the ACC ACCREDITED AGENT or their LAWYER hasn't either told a series of lies, or with-held vital evidence.

If the behaviour of these people was to exist outside the environment of ACC you'd have them for PERJURY and deliberately seeking to bring an injustice.

As I've experienced, it's an industry of cheats, liars and bully's.

Few can [in my opinion] lie straight in bed.



I as well many others would consider this information important for our
future ACC. court cases. Will you name them , so we will know whom to resist
ACC appointing such lawyers or ACC ACCREDITED AGENT ?
0

#7554 User is offline   He who pays the piper 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5623
  • Joined: 20-June 16

Posted Yesterday, 04:27 PM

From my experience, I would imagine all are the same.
0

#7555 User is offline   greg 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 979
  • Joined: 15-September 03

Posted Yesterday, 04:36 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 25 May 2017 - 04:27 PM, said:

From my experience, I would imagine all are the same.



Name them ;. please.
0

#7556 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7998
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted Yesterday, 05:21 PM

View PostHe who pays the piper, on 25 May 2017 - 03:28 PM, said:

There hasn't been a FAIRWAY or DISTRICT COURT hearing that I have attended where the ACC ACCREDITED AGENT or their LAWYER hasn't either told a series of lies, or with-held vital evidence.

If the behaviour of these people was to exist outside the environment of ACC you'd have them for PERJURY and deliberately seeking to bring an injustice.

As I've experienced, it's an industry of cheats, liars and bully's.

Few can [in my opinion] lie straight in bed.





You can lie straight in bed though can't you Wightman, you can lie any where, and everywhere you filthy troll.






This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


Colin Wightman and Lianne Mylie spend all there time on this forum attacking people who have taken on ACC and won, when they themselves have not achieved anything.

They attack those that have at great personal cost to themselves and their families taken on the beast won, what have often been long and protracted battles.

These people continue in the best interest of justice to help others in similar situations, spending a lot of energy and personal time doing so.

These two trolls just bitch and moan about ACC, and attack harass and defame the people involved in the real fight.

I wonder what motivates them, money perhaps, they might be on the ACC payroll maybe.



This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.

And the following bullshit below, which is on her signature, so shows every time she posts.


Bruce threatened me with bodily harm on 18 and 19 May 2017. He wrote; "I only have the one membership, I have only ever had the one membership, you have no evidence at all to prove the lie you are putting forward, it is no different to the many previous lies you have told, and if you continue to travel down this path of persistent stalking and trouble making, it will end badly for you" (my use of underlining).
Mini also threatened me with bodily harm on 18 May 2017. She wrote; "Be very careful they don't come looking for you."
This message has been added at 8.20 p.m. on 19/5/2017 and is a record that may be referred to should anything "untoward" happen to me.



You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


0

#7557 User is offline   greg 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 979
  • Joined: 15-September 03

Posted Yesterday, 06:56 PM

I will start topics so go fuck yourself .
0

#7558 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8087
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted Yesterday, 09:22 PM

View PostBrucey, on 25 May 2017 - 05:21 PM, said:

You can lie straight in bed though can't you Wightman, you can lie any where, and everywhere you filthy troll.






This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.


Colin Wightman and Lianne Mylie spend all there time on this forum attacking people who have taken on ACC and won, when they themselves have not achieved anything.

They attack those that have at great personal cost to themselves and their families taken on the beast won, what have often been long and protracted battles.

These people continue in the best interest of justice to help others in similar situations, spending a lot of energy and personal time doing so.

These two trolls just bitch and moan about ACC, and attack harass and defame the people involved in the real fight.

I wonder what motivates them, money perhaps, they might be on the ACC payroll maybe.



This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.


He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?








I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

She also believes that people who at times need social support, are" Bludgers"

Lianne Mylie said


" I have never received even 1c from the N.Z. Government in any form of income or other social service type support, and I am proud of this fact. Unlike the many bludgers who frequent this forum".


Below is one example of many where Lianne Mylie concocts a malicious story to attack a genuine ACC claimant.




Battleaxe said.




Yes I have a very clear picture of what you are ... in my honest and genuine opinion, a pathological liar, manipulator of the facts and the truth, someone who is pompous, rude and arrogant to his own detriment and who wrongly believes he is above me and the law, and a serious, repeated, stalker, harasser, verbal abuser and writer of false and defamatory statements about me and other forum members.

I did not have to any "research" about you. Your identity is glaringly obvious and your footprint is like that of an elephant in the snow (your words).

You have not had "one membership and the two moniker" (sic). The evidence is irrefutable. You had the "Brucey" moniker on 7 June 2014 which was 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED THE "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO THE "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Your member profile is evidence that you did the aforementioned change on 5 December 2015.

Your "explanation" is improbable and implausible. In fact I honestly and genuinely believe it to be another of your bald-faced lies.

It is NOT about the "Angryman" moniker. It IS about you using the "Brucey" moniker 18 MONTHS BEFORE YOU CHANGED YOUR "ANGRYMAN" MONIKER TO YOUR "BRUCEY" MONIKER. Not possible if you did have these two memberships at the same time.

I am not a "filthy lying troll", and, I do have plenty of examples of you using the "Brucey" moniker long before you changed your "Angryman" moniker to your "Brucey" moniker. Again, not possible if you did not have these two memberships at the same time.

There is no justification, cause or reason, to write false and defamatory statements about me the way you have been doing for months, Bruce, and I am NOT a "stupid bitch" or "dumb arse".

Every offensive and defamatory statement you write about me is going to cost you dearly.

I am not "clearly causing trouble" but you are.

I am committed to achieving justice and holding you and your "TrollWatch" friends accountable. This will not change no matter what obscenities and profanities you hurl at me. In fact, it only makes me more determined than I was before.

And the following bullshit below, which is on her signature, so shows every time she posts.


Bruce threatened me with bodily harm on 18 and 19 May 2017. He wrote; "I only have the one membership, I have only ever had the one membership, you have no evidence at all to prove the lie you are putting forward, it is no different to the many previous lies you have told, and if you continue to travel down this path of persistent stalking and trouble making, it will end badly for you" (my use of underlining).
Mini also threatened me with bodily harm on 18 May 2017. She wrote; "Be very careful they don't come looking for you."
This message has been added at 8.20 p.m. on 19/5/2017 and is a record that may be referred to should anything "untoward" happen to me.



You absolutely are a troublemaker, my explanation is not improbable it is true. when you change your name the forum changes all of your previous posts to that name , as you know any quotes can not be changed, so they remain under the old name.

It is exactly the same as when you change or add a new signature, it is placed on all of your posts back to day one. FACT.

you will notice if you bother to look that all quotes prior to the change date are the old name, and all posts by me are the new name. Very simple explanation yet in your total ignorance and blinding fury to falsely pursue me for imagined wrong doing see you persist with the lie.



http://www.100megspo...anna/010115.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLLS Colin Wightman, or Lianne Mylie


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.



0

Share this topic:


  • 378 Pages +
  • « First
  • 376
  • 377
  • 378
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users