ACCforum: Dr James Toady Heggarty - ACCforum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Dr James Toady Heggarty Ex ACC Clinical Dodgy Doc

#1 User is offline   ACCFIGHT 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 05-September 15

Posted 30 August 2016 - 10:50 PM

Dr Toady Heggarty is doing acc assessments outside of ACC, as he no longer works in ACC and still writing unlawfull medical reports in favour off ACC.

This guy has stuff all qualifications and tells acc what they want to hear and much more. He needs exposed like Dr Du Plessis

Please share stories on James Heggarty cheers
0

#2 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2656
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 30 August 2016 - 11:06 PM

View PostACCFIGHT, on 30 August 2016 - 10:50 PM, said:

Dr Toady Heggarty is doing acc assessments outside of ACC, as he no longer works in ACC and still writing unlawfull medical reports in favour off ACC.

This guy has stuff all qualifications and tells acc what they want to hear and much more. He needs exposed like Dr Du Plessis

Please share stories on James Heggarty cheers


Awww you got a report you weren't able to handle.

What you have written just gives support groups NO respect.

There's no examples or anything to explain why your crying..

Dick!





0

#3 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 31 August 2016 - 09:04 AM

http://accforum.org/...iew__getnewpost
0

#4 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2656
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 31 August 2016 - 10:39 PM

['Not their victim'] writes lots of nasty things about people, as shown in her recent court case and just goes to show she is a NUTTER.

['Not their victim'] 's most recent court decision to stay BLUDGING off the ACC scheme states; (Relevant facts)

[4] By way of preliminary issue, Mr Beck and Mr McBride agreed that all annotations on documents made by ['Not their victim'] should be removed from the evidence as filed. Counsel agreed that documents in the bundle for hearing would be replaced with an agreed bundle – Volume 2, which was received following the hearing on 22 December 2014. I have considered these documents in the appeal.:o/>:wacko:/>

[14] The Corporation referred Ms ['Not their victim'] to Dr Fenwicke for a VIMA in January 2008. She found Ms ['Not their victim'] fit for light sedentary work. Dr Fenwicke recorded Ms ['Not their victim'] commenced work on a part time basis building up to a 35 hour week. Dr Fenwicke noted Ms ['Not their victim'] had made some clinical improvement since the assessment in 2006. No other treatment, apart from being monitored by her GP, was recommended by Dr Fenwicke.

(That was 10 years ago !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

[15] Following Dr Fenwicke’s report, the Corporation determined Ms ['Not their victim'] was vocationally independent on 2 September 2008. That decision was quashed at review on 13 February 2009. :rolleyes:/> = BLUDGING

[16] On 5 August 2009 Dr Kanji, Musculoskeletal Pain Specialist noted that Ms ['Not their victim'] hit her forehead against a steel bar in January 2009. As a result, Ms ['Not their victim'] experienced difficulties with memory, headaches, neck and thoracic pain. Dr Kanji considered the headaches were likely to be linked to pain from the facet joints due to the fusion and disc changes. He prescribed pain medication for chronic pain.

[48] ['Not their victim'] underwent a Vocational Independence Occupational Assessment (VIOA) undertaken by Mr Roux who identified 19 job types that would match ['Not their victim']'s skills, experience and training, and for which there were no vocational barriers.

[67] The VIMA was then undertaken by Dr Christian on 2 February 2011. Dr Christian concluded 15 jobs were suitable for ['Not their victim'] for 30 hours or more per week.

These are truly only part of her team of physicians to get her brain working well enough to get her back to being a productive member of society however she has got so use to bludging she gets headaches,,. when she hears the word "WORK",

Dr Walsh, Psychiatrist

Dr Hudson,

Dr Hunn, Neurosurgeon

Dr Baker, Neurologist

All I can conclude/summarise with is,, get a job NTV and stop the HARD mind-set of being a BLUDGER !
0

#5 User is offline   ACCFIGHT 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 05-September 15

Posted 02 September 2016 - 10:31 PM

Rex you have no farken idea what your on about go back to your keyboard warrior
0

#6 User is offline   ACCFIGHT 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 05-September 15

Posted 03 September 2016 - 06:25 AM

View PostREX, on 30 August 2016 - 11:06 PM, said:

Awww you got a report you weren't able to handle.

What you have written just gives support groups NO respect.

There's no examples or anything to explain why your crying..

Dick!


Hey dickheads you need to STOP being a keyboard warrior you have no idea.
0

#7 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 03 September 2016 - 08:06 AM

Go to focus acc fight

people can see exactly why this forum isn't working

a few dropkick with their own agenda keep bashing those who have taken on and exposed huge issues

In fact some of us have even won

However, that too seems to piss off the bullies

See you on the other site...
0

#8 User is offline   ACCFIGHT 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 05-September 15

Posted 04 September 2016 - 10:12 AM

Cheers not the victim what's the other site???
0

#9 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 04 September 2016 - 11:48 AM

Pm....

All good dude....
0

#10 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2656
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 04 September 2016 - 08:18 PM

View PostACCFIGHT, on 02 September 2016 - 10:31 PM, said:

Rex you have no farken idea what your on about go back to your keyboard warrior



How does it feel to be given permission to speak from a dumb as one can be,,namely NTV
You must be spechal.
You should go take NUTTERV's advice or she might tell you off or even funnier when her head spins on its axis
0

#11 User is offline   greg 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1159
  • Joined: 15-September 03

Posted 04 September 2016 - 09:22 PM

View PostREX, on 04 September 2016 - 08:18 PM, said:

How does it feel to be given permission to speak from a dumb as one can be,,namely NTV
You must be spechal.
You should go take NUTTERV's advice or she might tell you off or even funnier when her head spins on its axis


Who or why do you continue this attack?. are you an ACC informant expecting
a payback?.

Insults won't change the facts .and if that's all you have .

I hope ACC pays you well. Point proven
0

#12 User is offline   ACCFIGHT 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 05-September 15

Posted 05 September 2016 - 01:07 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 04 September 2016 - 11:48 AM, said:

Pm....

All good dude....


PM you dude cheers
0

#13 User is offline   tommy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1965
  • Joined: 21-September 05

Posted 05 September 2016 - 02:41 PM

as in your reastablisment of entitlements back pays etc as you believe you were under legislation entitled to , would you not be in a position to accept that fact , and what posseses you to carry on on in a manner you are doing to date , trying justify to other members you are right and they are wrong ,, and now in a mode of going to another site, and also may i add what is your latest irp include as in rehabilitation with the corporation , if there exists any for that matter , or you under a maintainence programme, as referring to NTV
0

#14 User is offline   tommy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1965
  • Joined: 21-September 05

Posted 05 September 2016 - 02:43 PM

i would be expecting an answer to similar , "go jump in the lake " tommy, but wait and see , NTV may surprise me
0

#15 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 05 September 2016 - 03:01 PM

Why don't you read for a change THOMAS

Get this straight...

If acc had one thing...anything...they could use against me...they would have put me into appeal

Instead..

Admitted culpability
Back paid ERC of 13 years
And
INTEREST PAID

pays to

Tell the truth

Produce medico legal evidence

Prove where acc screwed you over with their own files

record everything

Research and learn to read law

Understand what A POINT OF LAW IS....

THEN TAKE IT TO THE JUDGE.....



Telling the truth is simple

So I won't be answering any more dumb questions because you are too lazy to read
And keep being provocative

Things to do
People to see
And cleaning up after a party here this weekend

See ya!
0

#16 User is offline   tommy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1965
  • Joined: 21-September 05

Posted 05 September 2016 - 03:17 PM

to have that clarified is good , and where is your rehab stand to date with the corporation currently in your irp, ie if you do have one and still have a claim as an injured claimant as in chronic ie more than three months as opposed to acute, or are you in a maintenance programme ,, or have you become an awaiting superannuiant ," NTV ", your choice of answering as you mentioned as i have deficits as in long and short term memory , so have some tolerance with my problematic questions as you are recognising ,
0

#17 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 05 September 2016 - 06:28 PM

no more questions Thomas.....

my business

is no one elses im afraid....



READ...

I have NOTHING to hide.....

and my story is in here guts and all......

BUT

heres 2 questions for you........

If...i wasnt telling the truth....



wouldn't acc have appealed???


woudnt acc have withheld payments....?



telling the truth is easy, nothing changes......
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users