ACCforum: ... - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

... .

#21 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2647
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 21 August 2016 - 02:53 PM

View Postanonymousey, on 21 August 2016 - 02:49 PM, said:

yeah whatever Rex ... I did mention to readers to consider... your join date ie *Joined: 16-July 09* ...

... just to check...so can I confirm that you are now saying you were here

1/ when the admin accounts were modified ....

and 2/ when discussions from Alan with his last conviction were first discussed in here ...


I don't have the patients for answering all your quam :P/>
0

#22 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 21 August 2016 - 03:53 PM

Learn to spell f/wit

Or at least use spell check

Patience...
0

#23 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2647
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 21 August 2016 - 04:10 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 21 August 2016 - 03:53 PM, said:

Learn to spell f/wit

Or at least use spell check

Patience...


Would you stop being abusive for no reason, Yes I should check the spellings of ma enggrish but can't be f..beeeeped :rolleyes:/>
0

#24 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 21 August 2016 - 05:43 PM

rex's trolling of ntv...is very apparent to those in the know

and those who can see exactly what is written by whom


of course i will defend myself against a misogynistic bully.....
0

#25 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2647
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 31 August 2016 - 10:44 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 21 August 2016 - 05:43 PM, said:

rex's trolling of ntv...is very apparent to those in the know

and those who can see exactly what is written by whom


of course i will defend myself against a misogynistic bully.....



['Not their victim'] writes lots of nasty things about people, as shown in her recent court case and just goes to show she is a NUTTER.

['Not their victim'] 's most recent court decision to stay BLUDGING off the ACC scheme states; (Relevant facts)

[4] By way of preliminary issue, Mr Beck and Mr McBride agreed that all annotations on documents made by ['Not their victim'] should be removed from the evidence as filed. Counsel agreed that documents in the bundle for hearing would be replaced with an agreed bundle – Volume 2, which was received following the hearing on 22 December 2014. I have considered these documents in the appeal.:o/>:wacko:/>

[14] The Corporation referred Ms ['Not their victim'] to Dr Fenwicke for a VIMA in January 2008. She found Ms ['Not their victim'] fit for light sedentary work. Dr Fenwicke recorded Ms ['Not their victim'] commenced work on a part time basis building up to a 35 hour week. Dr Fenwicke noted Ms ['Not their victim'] had made some clinical improvement since the assessment in 2006. No other treatment, apart from being monitored by her GP, was recommended by Dr Fenwicke.

(That was 10 years ago !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

[15] Following Dr Fenwicke’s report, the Corporation determined Ms ['Not their victim'] was vocationally independent on 2 September 2008. That decision was quashed at review on 13 February 2009. :rolleyes:/> = BLUDGING

[16] On 5 August 2009 Dr Kanji, Musculoskeletal Pain Specialist noted that Ms ['Not their victim'] hit her forehead against a steel bar in January 2009. As a result, Ms ['Not their victim'] experienced difficulties with memory, headaches, neck and thoracic pain. Dr Kanji considered the headaches were likely to be linked to pain from the facet joints due to the fusion and disc changes. He prescribed pain medication for chronic pain.

[48] ['Not their victim'] underwent a Vocational Independence Occupational Assessment (VIOA) undertaken by Mr Roux who identified 19 job types that would match ['Not their victim']'s skills, experience and training, and for which there were no vocational barriers.

[67] The VIMA was then undertaken by Dr Christian on 2 February 2011. Dr Christian concluded 15 jobs were suitable for ['Not their victim'] for 30 hours or more per week.

These are truly only part of her team of physicians to get her brain working well enough to get her back to being a productive member of society however she has got so use to bludging she gets headaches,,. when she hears the word "WORK",

Dr Walsh, Psychiatrist

Dr Hudson,

Dr Hunn, Neurosurgeon

Dr Baker, Neurologist

All I can conclude/summarise with is,, get a job NTV and stop the HARD mind-set of being a BLUDGER !
2

#26 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10829
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 01 September 2016 - 09:38 AM

worth noting that researchers who’ve studied cyberbullying distinguish between two kinds of online harassers: trolls, who pursue their victim for sadistic pleasure, and cyberstalkers, who go after a person out of pathological anger toward the victim.

The latter are potentially far more dangerous, according to the experts.

REX THREATENS TO BASH WOMEN

and

HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER IS A SADISTIC PSYCHOPATH BY HIS OWN WRITINGS...

HE HAS GREAT PLEASURE IS ATTEMPTING TO TAUNT RAPE VICTIMS,
THE HEAD INJURED,
WOMEN AND ALL
INJURED PERSONS

THE FORUM IS OFFICIALLY MUNTED DUE TO THE

MISADMINISTRATION OF THIS SITE



STATES IN THE RULES...

ONE MUST COOPERATE WITH THE AUTHORITIES..

LET'S GET THE TRUTH ESTABLISHED

THIS DEN OF INIQUITY NEEDS CLOSING DOWN



DUE TO ONGOING TROLLING OF A PERSON WHO IS NOT EVEN ON CLAIM

SO THERE MUST BE A GOOD REASON FOR THAT!

COULD IT BE HE HAS SCABBED ACC BEFORE?


FROM THE RAGE WITHIN THE ENDLESS POSTINGS OF HOW BAD THE CORPORATION IS

AND THE THREATS OF TAKING FERTILIZER TO PARLIAMENT. .




YES PIPER WROTE THAT...




This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by the individual who refers to himself as He who pays the Piper.

This Troll likes to throw around accusations so the people feel they have to justify themselves to him.

This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line.

He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity.

The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist.


New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll and his Psycophantic Cohorts
0

#27 User is offline   Kewl 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 287
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 23 December 2016 - 05:37 PM

Anonymousey
There is something holding you back from exercising the true and powerful effect of you as a person and your professional training.

What would it be , or what role would you take , apart from some random words on some well unknown blog site, would it take to empower your children, grandchildren to treat each other better WHILST at the same time being aware
of what it is at a root cause what forms your personality and thinking structure? A hint, its not so much about the key words of " abuse"
It is how to be aware of that so you can leave the legacy of empowerment to your self to a degree that your own children and their children reap the benefit of the emotional and behavioural understanding between the ears your legacy is far greater than your own inner suffering. Consider that.

I will see you et all soon, for coffee flat white, i want to hear and feel how you are empowering you for that has the flow on effect. just do it

For when you do, you will no longer require this medium, you will be self empowered . neat eh
0

#28 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6631
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 01 January 2017 - 08:17 AM

Well Kewl

It would be a shame if anonymousey did not come and visit this forum.org and give us the abundance of knowledge that she has.

From the first write on this chappie I could tell the writer why the claimant is not going to make much money. I could also suggest a couple of place he may find a solution to his amount of income earned over those years and there is a section in the act that says that if the employer is no longer a live company, it is no reason why ACC need not pay them out.

Every one who has been on winz should know this yet no one has used this forum for what it is meant. it truly is knotted. A frayed knot at that.

In the 15 years I have been fighting for my entitlements including w/c, you all have known that I was working on the problems that surrounded the taxing of the backdated weekly compensation.

No body is prepared to tell this fellow how to find the answers to his delimia. Which is a real shame as I am only here to round off my statement to the powers that be.

Mini
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users