REX, on 11 January 2016 - 07:20 PM, said:
We are getting on with what we were dealt with.
Yes you will see that accusations from members go around and around because they can't justify their statements they post like;
The acc has never been able to show evidence of any actual job, (just a job title that has never been proved to derived an income to abeit),
The acc has not shown evidence of any payment for a job title as an income (just accusations/slander which the judge sided with )
The acc judges are paid by the acc which is the way legislation is written for the system to play and we are supposed to believe the Acc are "working in good faith", Until we get an independent review and court process, doctors, specialists, we will have decisions that take away our entitlement by the acc SOMEHOW slip it though, which to me proves the judges have an agender caused by the acc systems conflicts of interest.
Rex the ACC initially accused me of being an immigration consultant while also managing and immigration consultancy. They asked the reviewer to adjourn which he did bbecause the ACC had no information to support the allegatio. The reviewer adjourned but did not reconvene with the decision not to disturb the ACC's decision without any form of review hearing to address any work of any sort. There was no review hearing. Over the years the ACC acknowledged that they had no information to describe anything remotely connected to immigration consultancy which is particularly interesting since that the ACC shared the same floor of the same building as New Zealand immigration services who would have all information from every single immigration consultant in the country. This is an occupation you simply cannot be engaged in without leaving evidence with immigration services.
10 years later I managed to get a court order requiring the ACC to disclose the individual work task activities alleged at the material time of which the ACC fail to comply with that order. As there was no information to describe a single work task activity the judge decided to instead make a new decision for the ACC based on whether or not the judge thought that I was incapacitated or not by way of the medical evidence. As I had completely maintained the absolute position that I was injured and had not worked with people like Douglas wheel accusing me of playing to blow out the ACC the judge decided that I must be some kind of crazed liar and therefore must have falsified my injuries to the medical profession despite the ACC's own funded reports confirming my injuries were absolute and that I could not returned my preinjury occupation. Of course the ACC did not argue with the judge as the ACC stood to financially benefit from the judges ridiculous mistake when he put his own medical assumptions which were based upon his rather mystical powers over and above the men of science.
Rex in addition to the ACC claimant I was working they told the newspaper that I had an income of $1.3 million of which the ACC quite coldly and calculatedly lied about as they had obtained by way of search warrant all the companies commercial information, all financial information regarding myself and bank records of numerous others having nothing to do with me except for the fact that ACC assumed that they must have had something to do with me. In other words the ACC invaded numerous other citizens privacy fishing for information that simply did not exist.
There was not only no job title but there was no work task activity for me to have ever reported to the ACC. All of the search warrants confirmed this to be a fact.
This is a classical case whereby the judge totally disregarded the information put before him and instead inventors own information by way of his imagination and extraordinary mystical powers of lie detection which you put above the entire medical professions integrity and expertise.
if this has happened to me, how many others as it also happened to but how many is yet to happen to. as the ACC staff are either threatened with murder or actually murdered how was it happens that they accused me of planning mass murder of ACC staff that did not even have any relationship with me. I am perfectly well aware of each and every individual employed by the ACC who have either deliberately lied or simply failed to do the job properly. The law provides proper mechanisms to punish these individuals in a manner that will remove these individuals from society in order to keep society safe.
Help
/>
/>
