ACCforum: Privacy breaches and Encryption of data - ACCforum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Privacy breaches and Encryption of data Anthem breach: A gap in federal health privacy law?

#1 User is offline   hukildaspida 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 3353
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 09 February 2015 - 04:36 PM

Please note there are related articles that can be read through this link


Anthem breach: A gap in federal health privacy law?

Associated Press
By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR February 6, 2015 6:05 PM

http://news.yahoo.co...0--finance.html

WASHINGTON (AP) — Insurers aren't required to encrypt consumers' data under a 1990s federal law that remains the foundation for health care privacy in the Internet age — an omission that seems striking in light of the major cyberattack against Anthem.


Related Stories

Anthem Hack: Health Care Insurers Aren't Required to Encrypt Consumer Data Huffington Post
[$$] Health Insurer Anthem Didn’t Encrypt Data in Theft The Wall Street Journal
Anthem's stolen customer data not encrypted CNET
Gov't investigating if Medicare data stolen in Anthem hack Associated Press
[$$] Anthem Health Insurer Hit by Big Data Breach The Wall Street Journal

Encryption uses mathematical formulas to scramble data, converting sensitive details coveted by intruders into gibberish. Anthem, the second-largest U.S. health insurer, has said the data stolen from a company database that stored information on 80 million people was not encrypted.

The main federal health privacy law — the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA — encourages encryption, but doesn't require it.

The lack of a clear encryption standard undermines public confidence, some experts say, even as the government plows ahead to spread the use of computerized medical records and promote electronic information sharing among hospitals, doctors and insurers.

"We need a whole new look at HIPAA," said David Kibbe, CEO of DirectTrust, a nonprofit working to create a national framework for secure electronic exchange of personal health information.

"Any identifying information relevant to a patient ... should be encrypted," said Kibbe. It should make no difference, he says, whether that information is being transmitted on the Internet or sitting in a company database, as was the case with Anthem.

Late Friday, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee said it's planning to examine encryption requirements as part of a bipartisan review of health information security. "We will consider whether there are ways to strengthen current protections," said Jim Jeffries, spokesman for chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.

The agency charged with enforcing the privacy rules is a small unit of the federal Health and Human Services Department, called the Office for Civil Rights.


The office said in a statement Friday that it has yet to receive formal notification of the hack from Anthem, but nonetheless is treating the case as a privacy law matter. Although Anthem alerted mainline law enforcement agencies, the law allows 60 days for notifying HHS.

View gallery
Graphic shows details of recent notable data breaches …
Graphic shows details of recent notable data breaches by organization, including Anthem Insurance; 3 …

The statement from the privacy office said the kind of personal data stolen by the Anthem hackers is covered by HIPAA, even if it does not include medical information.

"The personally identifiable information health plans maintain on enrollees and members — including names and Social Security numbers — is protected under HIPAA, even if no specific diagnostic or treatment information is disclosed," the statement said.

A 2009 federal law promoting computerized medical records sought to nudge the health care industry toward encryption. Known as the HITECH Act, it required public disclosure of any health data breach affecting 500 or more people. It also created an exemption for companies that encrypt their data.

Encryption has been seen as a controversial issue in the industry, particularly with data that's only being stored and not transmitted. Encryption adds costs and can make day-to-day operations more cumbersome. It can also be defeated if someone manages to decipher the code or steals the key to it.

In fact, Anthem spokeswoman Kristin Binns said encryption would not have thwarted the latest attack because the hacker also had a system administrator's ID and password. She said the company normally encrypts data that it exports.

But some security experts said a stolen credential by itself shouldn't be an all-access pass to encrypted data.

Martin Walter, senior director at RedSeal Networks, a Silicon Valley cybersecurity firm, said encryption can be tuned to limit the data that even authorized users can view at one time. That makes it harder for an outsider to copy a whole stockpile of records.

Under the HITECH law, the government set up a public database listing major breaches, known informally as the "hall of shame." Breaches on that list affected more than 40 million people over a decade, meaning that the Anthem case could be twice as damaging as all previous reported incidents combined.

Indiana University law professor Nicolas Terry said it seemed at the time of the 2009 law that the government had struck a reasonable balance, creating incentives for encryption while stopping short of imposing a one-size-fits-all solution. Now he's concerned that the compromise has been overtaken by events.

"In today's environment, we should expect all health care providers to encrypt their data from end to end," said Terry, who specializes in health information technology.

If the voluntary approach isn't working, "HHS should amend the security rule to make encryption mandatory," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Brandon Bailey, Ted Bridis and Tom Murphy contributed to this report.

___

Online:

HHS breach database - http://tinyurl.com/o4wd6ym
0

#2 User is offline   hukildaspida 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 3353
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 09 February 2015 - 04:41 PM

Is our data that http://www.acc.co.nz and it's contracted agents encrypted?

If not, why not? and what is been done about it?

With more and more international cross jurisdiction it's important that these issues are addressed expeditiously and professionally.

For those that are unaware in New Zealand and Australia, Microsoft, Spark and Vodafone all have "customer services centres" based in the Philippines and India so all our data is likely at some stage to pass through to these countries.

How safe really is our private information?

0

#3 User is offline   tommy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1965
  • Joined: 21-September 05

Posted 09 February 2015 - 04:49 PM

control of whom and that is control . as in a more modern sense , and that leads to monetery control , one can only wonder why simple guesswork if you follow the past
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users