ACCforum: Herlihy (Barry) v Accident Compensation Corporation - ACCforum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Herlihy (Barry) v Accident Compensation Corporation

#1 User is offline   hukildaspida 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 3353
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 10 October 2014 - 03:38 PM

Herlihy v Accident Compensation Corporation [2006] NZACC 196 (2 August 2006)


http://www.nzlii.org...l?query=herlihy
0

#2 User is offline   hukildaspida 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 3353
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 10 October 2014 - 03:41 PM

Join the dots and form your own opinion in relation to who is in bed with who.

There is plenty of information on http://www.accforum.org and elsewhere that anyone contemplating using the Advocate in this case should read prior to engaging or disclosing one's identity or any of one's http://www.acc.co.nz claim details to.

Use keywords Advantage Advocacy, Robert/ Earle Mckinney, Goodall, Dermot/t Nottingham/ Bonner/ Jamieson etc and it should all pop up for you to use your commonsense if you should engage with these people.

A scan in "Private forum's" within http://www.accforum.org is also worth a look as it confirms he type of "personalities" these aforementioned persons have to others.

Yes, that's the same people that have hurled endless abuse at others on this forum.

Behavior we did not want nor did we ever encourage.

0

#3 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7810
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 10 October 2014 - 09:44 PM

View Posthukildaspida, on 10 October 2014 - 03:41 PM, said:

Join the dots and form your own opinion in relation to who is in bed with who.

There is plenty of information on http://www.accforum.org and elsewhere that anyone contemplating using the Advocate in this case should read prior to engaging or disclosing one's identity or any of one's http://www.acc.co.nz claim details to.

Use keywords Advantage Advocacy, Robert/ Earle Mckinney, Goodall, Dermot/t Nottingham/ Bonner/ Jamieson etc and it should all pop up for you to use your commonsense if you should engage with these people.

A scan in "Private forum's" within http://www.accforum.org is also worth a look as it confirms he type of "personalities" these aforementioned persons have to others.

Yes, that's the same people that have hurled endless abuse at others on this forum.

Behavior we did not want nor did we ever encourage.



Spider

What you write is very important for people employing advocates to assist them win their cases. However, the bigger picture is that we need proof to bring these people into the Aka's that have caused such havoc on this site and to the people they name and defame and threaten under those Akas. Without this proof we have nothing. Opinions are not much good in a court of law.

While it would be lovely to think that all we need is opinions, it is not factual, therefore not helpful

We all know that we are are on the right track, as those mentioned do as well, and hence their silence of late.

It need the police to investigate who the akas are so that we have real people to charge. Not just akas who could be anyone.

It is all still on the boil and open for further proof. While we are here, there is always the possibility that we will win.

Cheers

Mini
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users