ACCforum: ... - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

... .

#21 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10813
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 12 September 2015 - 11:09 AM

This is an important topic involving mental health patients not getting treatment they need and being dumped into the community with Johnny Manu being a case in point.

Mental health specialists including the Ministry of Health's own Mental Health Director, raises concerns about the release of patients into the community. The ACC legislation imposes a duty of care upon the ACC itself to promote safety in the community yet have not taken any notice whatsoever of the mental health specialists to re-establish proper care for the mentally disabled despite their staff being murdered. This raises very serious concerns about the dereliction of duty's involving death, notwithstanding that the death includes their own staff. even worse when ACC received my expressions of concern about their frontline staff behaviour in advance in the office with the murder occurred instead of respecting my good advice they instead attacked me with a continuous trespassed order until the present which is almost 2 decades without any sign of any change. When challenged for clarifying the reasons they then invited assumptions from their informants in order to shut me down. It seems that the ACC would rather shoot the messenger rather than face the reality of their misplaced sense of priorities.
2

#22 User is offline   Tomcat 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2158
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 12 September 2015 - 11:21 AM

View PostDavid Butler, on 12 September 2015 - 08:36 AM, said:

At the time of posting this and in regards to the two posts that Kenneth Miller seems so concerned about to give him cause to publish as he has
Mini within post #16 has 5 Red
Alan within post#17 has 7 green
Netcoach within post #18 has 2 Green
Tomcat post #19 has a zero on both red / green


It would indicate that a Minimum sub total to date of of Seven members have exercised there right to vote on the content of those #16 and #17 posts
Mini had more than 5 reds and appeared to receive Green votes which has reduced her amount of reds and Alan had some reds which reduced tally down- but up again with greens,
This is how it works
Seven have voted green for alan and also can vote red for mini so we have a total of a Minimum of voters at 7 members in either red or green re these particular posts
What is the problem you have Miller
Your own post at #19 shows you appear to have issues with members using there right to vote
You state as a fact there are never more that 2 members in the site.
More that that from my perusals of it. MUST BE as the number is at least seven re these postings.
Then you moan about you not receiving reds and not greens
A member does not have to post to vote .
Then you accuse of fraud re the votes being placed
Members can and do exercise there votes on the content of posts/ or re the poster.
How are you going to obtain the forum records of whom voted what and then have you powers that be come up with Fraudulent voting
You DONT even have the balls to write whom you class as your so called Powers to be you weak ass prick.
And What law would that be you going to use re fraud as to voting in here
What the F?A forum member up for fraud as to exercising their right to vote in a public forum
YOUR AN ABSOLUTE FUKWIT Miller
All it is=Is members exercising their voting rights-Do you want to have control what members think and do in here Kenneth?
Seems to be that from your own content re the voting system available to members
As for you claim re attachments -=BOLLOCKS
What is obvious here is that immediately any of your posts appears you have a green =That would make you a very vain person.
You LOST any control /influence that you did wield in here / and the trust of the sites owner you had within here long ago =when you had ALL you rights of access to the forums workings TAKEN AWAY from you, so Get a life and piss of to your on site
You are no better than Fran Van Helmond with your attempts to intimidate /harass using the Powers that Be as a means to get your wicked way
That type of activity has FAILED BADLY for Fran
Don't continue to be the Public PLONKER you show to be out here and Read the content and vote on that instead of you very obvious voting habit as to your dislike of the poster and ignoring the actual data / content.

David


:ph34r:/>:lol:/>:rolleyes:/>.... More "Bovine discharge" from the accforum SUPERGRASS / ABUSER.
You expose yourself for the FOOL you are daily on here.
Be a good little "owner-operator" and put it way.
2

#23 User is offline   netcoachnz 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3454
  • Joined: 26-January 11

Posted 12 September 2015 - 06:15 PM

View PostTomcat, on 11 September 2015 - 10:22 PM, said:

Posted Image/>.... LIAR ....

Hey NET CRAPPER,


the time is not far off when you will have to explain how so many positives for Tomo's RODENT Tag team
and so many negatives for us genuine members...

The fact is apart from 1 or 2 occasional members posting,
the is never any more than 2 members on site.
guests dont see "members only"...

So why keep up with the OBVIOUS LIE ???...FOOL
It amounts to FRAUD...

<snip>




Tomcat has been asked politely to address us by our forum name of netcoachnz, however, he continues to be rude and abusive with his name calling. This tells this fine forum that Tomcat is amoral and unethical in his behaviour. Using the reputation points system of this forum's software cannot be regarded a fraud, this is simply nonsense and paranoia. We feel that Tomcat is jealous that other forum members have more positive points than he has.
-3

#24 User is offline   Tomcat 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2158
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 12 September 2015 - 06:24 PM

View Postnetcoachnz, on 12 September 2015 - 06:15 PM, said:

Tomcat has been asked politely to address us by our forum name of netcoachnz, however, he continues to be rude and abusive with his name calling. This tells this fine forum that Tomcat is amoral and unethical in his behaviour. Using the reputation points system of this forum's software cannot be regarded a fraud, this is simply nonsense and paranoia. We feel that Tomcat is jealous that other forum members have more positive points than he has.


:ph34r:/>:lol:/>:rolleyes:/>... Hey Crutchy...
at least you have done one good thing today.

Made us laugh at your hypocritical paranoid nonsense.
Now be a good little "Owner-operator" and put it away :blink:/>

1

#25 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10813
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 12 September 2015 - 06:39 PM

View PostTomcat, on 12 September 2015 - 06:24 PM, said:

... Hey Crutchy...
at least you have done one good thing today.

Made us laugh at your hypocritical paranoid nonsense.
Now be a good little "Owner-operator" and put it away Posted Image/>



Correct me if I am wrong but is Millar making more sexual references? ""Owner-operator" and put it away"
Why why why???

3

#26 User is offline   Tomcat 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2158
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 12 September 2015 - 07:56 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 12 September 2015 - 06:39 PM, said:

Correct me if I am wrong but is Millar making more sexual references? ""Owner-operator" and put it away"
Why why why???



:lol:/>:P/>... Just Your dirty mind as usual...... could be reference to almost anything FOOL.
6

#27 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10813
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 13 September 2015 - 10:57 AM

View PostTomcat, on 12 September 2015 - 07:56 PM, said:

>... Just Your dirty mind as usual...... could be reference to almost anything FOOL.


So what are you trying to say?

"Owner-operator" and put it away
0

#28 User is offline   Tomcat 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2158
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 13 September 2015 - 11:31 AM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 13 September 2015 - 10:57 AM, said:

So what are you trying to say?

"Owner-operator" and put it away


:lol:/>:rolleyes:/>... No need to play dumb Tomo...
I am merely stating the obvious. ;)/>
6

#29 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10813
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 13 September 2015 - 01:04 PM

View PostTomcat, on 13 September 2015 - 11:31 AM, said:

... No need to play dumb Tomo...
I am merely stating the obvious.


I am far from dumb and yes what you have written is apparently obvious combined with your usual practice of saying something offensive then trying to make out that you are saying something else. In short we do not believe you to be a person of good character to be taken at your word. You need to demonstrate integrity in order to earn it. You have earned the reputation of the exact opposite.

Obviously as your language normally centres around the nether regions I can only conclude that you are referring to the man's penis.

"Putting it away"of course it is in reference to putting away the penis which is a derogatory way of telling the man to withdraw. When you add owner operator this normally as a reference towards masturbation. When two like references are put together "Now be a good little "Owner-operator" and put it away" combined with your propensity towards offensive language in the same region it is not unreasonable to conclude that you are attempting to be offensive as possible.

If you want to deny this you will need to identify with due particularity what you have referenced. for example you are going to need to describe what this man owns and operates in order to maintain your claimed innocence. Failure to face up to the realities of your behaviour on the other hand will demonstrate you to be of low character and a coward.

3

#30 User is offline   Tomcat 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2158
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 13 September 2015 - 01:54 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 13 September 2015 - 01:04 PM, said:

I am far from dumb and yes what you have written is apparently obvious combined with your usual practice of saying something offensive then trying to make out that you are saying something else. In short we do not believe you to be a person of good character to be taken at your word. You need to demonstrate integrity in order to earn it. You have earned the reputation of the exact opposite.

Obviously as your language normally centres around the nether regions I can only conclude that you are referring to the man's penis.

"Putting it away"of course it is in reference to putting away the penis which is a derogatory way of telling the man to withdraw. When you add owner operator this normally as a reference towards masturbation. When two like references are put together "Now be a good little "Owner-operator" and put it away" combined with your propensity towards offensive language in the same region it is not unreasonable to conclude that you are attempting to be offensive as possible.

If you want to deny this you will need to identify with due particularity what you have referenced. for example you are going to need to describe what this man owns and operates in order to maintain your claimed innocence. Failure to face up to the realities of your behaviour on the other hand will demonstrate you to be of low character and a coward.



:ph34r:/>:lol:/>:rolleyes:/>.... You are "telling the story here FOOL" not me.
and it is even more clear the above is the product of your dirty mind.
and attempts to abuse / be little / intimidate / defame / threaten, etc etc.
myself and other genuine members.

And YES you are DUMB.
only a complete dumb-arsed FOOL such as yourself keeps on ooozing the lie(s)
in face of the facts that everyone knows it is total bullshit.







3

#31 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7810
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 13 September 2015 - 03:17 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 13 September 2015 - 01:04 PM, said:

I am far from dumb and yes what you have written is apparently obvious combined with your usual practice of saying something offensive then trying to make out that you are saying something else. In short we do not believe you to be a person of good character to be taken at your word. You need to demonstrate integrity in order to earn it. You have earned the reputation of the exact opposite.

Obviously as your language normally centres around the nether regions I can only conclude that you are referring to the man's penis.

"Putting it away"of course it is in reference to putting away the penis which is a derogatory way of telling the man to withdraw. When you add owner operator this normally as a reference towards masturbation. When two like references are put together "Now be a good little "Owner-operator" and put it away" combined with your propensity towards offensive language in the same region it is not unreasonable to conclude that you are attempting to be offensive as possible.

If you want to deny this you will need to identify with due particularity what you have referenced. for example you are going to need to describe what this man owns and operates in order to maintain your claimed innocence. Failure to face up to the realities of your behaviour on the other hand will demonstrate you to be of low character and a coward.



Alan Thomas you are disgusting!!

Mini
0

#32 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10813
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 13 September 2015 - 03:21 PM

View PostMINI, on 13 September 2015 - 03:17 PM, said:

Alan Thomas you are disgusting!!

Mini


It is your friend Kenneth Miller who is disgusting.

You will notice that virtually every single posting he makes has reference to body parts and bodily functions in a manner designed to offend.
2

#33 User is offline   MINI 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7810
  • Joined: 09-October 07

Posted 13 September 2015 - 05:11 PM

View PostDavid Butler, on 12 September 2015 - 08:36 AM, said:

At the time of posting this and in regards to the two posts that Kenneth Miller seems so concerned about to give him cause to publish as he has
Mini within post #16 has 5 Red
Alan within post#17 has 7 green
Netcoach within post #18 has 2 Green
Tomcat post #19 has a zero on both red / green


It would indicate that a Minimum sub total to date of of Seven members have exercised there right to vote on the content of those #16 and #17 posts
Mini had more than 5 reds and appeared to receive Green votes which has reduced her amount of reds and Alan had some reds which reduced tally down- but up again with greens,
This is how it works
Seven have voted green for alan and also can vote red for mini so we have a total of a Minimum of voters at 7 members in either red or green re these particular posts
What is the problem you have Miller
Your own post at #19 shows you appear to have issues with members using there right to vote
You state as a fact there are never more that 2 members in the site.
More that that from my perusals of it. MUST BE as the number is at least seven re these postings.
Then you moan about you not receiving reds and not greens
A member does not have to post to vote .
Then you accuse of fraud re the votes being placed
Members can and do exercise there votes on the content of posts/ or re the poster.
How are you going to obtain the forum records of whom voted what and then have you powers that be come up with Fraudulent voting
You DONT even have the balls to write whom you class as your so called Powers to be you weak ass prick.
And What law would that be you going to use re fraud as to voting in here
What the F?A forum member up for fraud as to exercising their right to vote in a public forum
YOUR AN ABSOLUTE FUKWIT Miller
All it is=Is members exercising their voting rights-Do you want to have control what members think and do in here Kenneth?
Seems to be that from your own content re the voting system available to members
As for you claim re attachments -=BOLLOCKS
What is obvious here is that immediately any of your posts appears you have a green =That would make you a very vain person.
You LOST any control /influence that you did wield in here / and the trust of the sites owner you had within here long ago =when you had ALL you rights of access to the forums workings TAKEN AWAY from you, so Get a life and piss of to your on site
You are no better than Fran Van Helmond with your attempts to intimidate /harass using the Powers that Be as a means to get your wicked way
That type of activity has FAILED BADLY for FranPosted Image
Don't continue to be the Public PLONKER you show to be out here and Read the content and vote on that instead of you very obvious voting habit as to your dislike of the poster and ignoring the actual data / content.

David


DB

Anyone including yourself who has more than one user name can give more than one reddy to anyone whos posts or even just being spiteful, that they care too.

This is well know on this forum.

Your calculation may look like a lot of people have been issueing reddies and greenies when in fact it maybe only one or two posting five reddies on one post.

But of course everyone one here knows this so we must look at your real reason for having such a deep interest in this utter garbage,in that it is so easily manipulated, a baby could figure it out.

My gosh you are a clever little warthog.

Mini
1

#34 User is offline   hukildaspida 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 3353
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 21 June 2016 - 04:30 PM

MANU - Johnny Idolf - 30/05/2016



Parole hearing

Under section 21(1) of the Parole Act 2002

Johnny Idolf MANU


Hearing: 30 May 2016 via AVL from Auckland Men’s Prison to [withheld]

Members of the Board:
Hon. MA Frater – Panel Convenor
Assoc. Prof. P Brinded
Mr J Thomson
Mr L Tawera

In attendance:
[withheld]

Support People:
[withheld]
[withheld]
[withheld]

http://www.paroleboa...-_30052016.html

DECISION OF THE BOARD
1. Johnny Idolf Manu, aged 52, is serving a life sentence of imprisonment, with a minimum non parole period of 12½ years, imposed in September 1999 for the murder of Janet Pike, an ACC case worker, in Henderson on 24 June that year.

2. Mr Manu remains a special patient subject to section 45 of the Mental Health Act 1992. He is currently housed [withheld]. He is diagnosed as suffering from a chronic psychotic illness with a history of personality disturbance, polysubstance abuse and serious violent offending.

3. While Mr Manu’s illness is largely controlled by medication, he continues to experience background hallucinations. In the time since he last appeared before the Board there has been slow, but identifiable, progress, to the point where consideration is being given to moving him to [withheld], an unlocked ward [withheld]. In preparation for that, he is about to attend a refresher course with a violence prevention programme he previously completed. Planning is also underway for him to meet with [withheld] later on this month.

4. He is not causing any problems in the unit. He works at [withheld] two days a week, shovelling compost, and wants to do that more frequently.

5. He is compliant with medication and displays insight into his offending. [withheld]

6. Given his history of offending and, particularly, the nature of his index offence, it is acknowledged that his rehabilitation and eventual reintegration needs to be taken very slowly and carefully. While it is difficult to estimate exactly how long that will take, he is unlikely to be suitable for parole in the foreseeable future.

7. He did not seek parole today and it is declined. His next hearing will be in May 2018 and, in any event, must be before the 30th of that month. Once again we ask that the hearing be face-to-face.

8. We also told Mr Manu that the issue of postponement would be on the table again at that hearing. He was subject to postponement orders in 2007 and 2011. He has the right to be represented by a lawyer at the next hearing and to have that person make written and/or oral submissions on his behalf.



Hon. MA Frater
Panel Convenor
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users