ACCforum: RIP - Rest in Peace - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

RIP - Rest in Peace

#21 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 30 September 2013 - 02:37 PM

View PostREX, on 30 September 2013 - 02:22 PM, said:

No its merely their safety that we are concerned about as you prove that they are potentially in serious danger of being stalked for scamming and most likely exposed to the Acc. <_<

0

#22 User is offline   netcoachnz 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3454
  • Joined: 26-January 11

Posted 30 September 2013 - 02:55 PM

View PostBLURB, on 30 September 2013 - 02:07 PM, said:


An apology to all Accforum members, also the names and email addresses of these resident accforum trolls you were in contact with will go a long way to re establishing our trust in you. The names and email addresses can be either forwarded to the Police or can be sent direct to our lawyer using the contact form on http://acc-claimants.info



Blurb, while we were replying to your original posting you appear to have edited the original and added the above paragraph which we now make comment upon.

netcoachnz has always apologized within a topic thread if a forum member has been genuinely offended and we try to always be as polite as we can within robust and adult discussions.

Blurb, we will not be contacting anyone using the acc-claimants.info website as we do not have TRUST in the ethics or integrity of how this site gathers information. If you provide your lawyers verifiable email address via PM we will consider your request in good faith.

netcoachnz is not entirely sure why an apology is required, to the best of our knowledge we have followed forum rules and have been ethical in our behaviour. We feel that every post made by netcoachnz can be justified if viewed in context and chronological order.

In good faith we state the following: If there are any forum members who feel that we have hurt or offended them, them please use the PM system to raise your concerns, please refer to the offending post and if upon reflection we find that we are at fault then we will make a suitable apology. If you do not wish to use the PM system then start a topic in the members only section to address your concerns.
5

#23 User is offline   BLURB 

  • accforum.nz
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5774
  • Joined: 22-July 06
  • LocationCambridge

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:18 PM

View Postnetcoachnz, on 30 September 2013 - 02:36 PM, said:

netcoachnz has never disclosed their real names publicly and you Blurb are potentially breaching a forum members right to Privacy & Personal Safety. Please be mindful you may be deemed to be breaking the law by continuing to call us by the name you are. You may be seen to be harassing and defaming an innocent person calling us the names you are. We request you refrain from addressing us by any other names than our http://www.accforum.org member name, which is netcoachnz




We involved our self in being part of a bulletin boards discussion no more no less. If you or others did not like what we posted then we suggest that you get a life. Your comment with regard legal action is viewed as intimidation and further bullying of netcoachnz by you Blurb.




Blurb, how can you possibly presume to know what netcoachnz has realized or thinks. We have kept a lower profile within this fine forum within the last few months due to ill health, thanks for your concern.



Again this is presumptive arrogance on your part Blurb. Netcoachnz has access to the same information as yourself by viewing a forum members details. We do not know the real names of forum members using an anonymous moniker.



Nothing illegal has happened that would want us to report the alleged information to the NZ Police. The information that we have would not assist the NZ Police.




Blurb, no one else will look after our own interests. Blurb, why are you getting abusive, are you unable to have sensible adult discussion and dialogue without making a personal attack.



Again Blurb, this is wild speculation on your part and bears nothing like the truth. We were sent some material about a certain forum member and asked for our comments. We proof read their document and added no new information, we do not know what happened to this information.




No forum members have stated any concern via PM system. We have been contacted to say thanks for the stand that we took on certain issues and the way we didn't let a forum member get away with their nonsense. We state again that what someone views as an attack we view as robust, adult discussion which is the purpose of a bulletin board.

Blurb, Netcoachnz is a genuine forum member.


What ever dude! 36 posts as @ 12.16PM which includes 2x campy below this post
0

#24 User is offline   Campy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1386
  • Joined: 15-May 10
  • LocationAuckland Regional super city

Posted 01 October 2013 - 11:16 AM

REX said:

1380507756[/url]' post='168560']
No its merely their safety that we are concerned about as you prove that they are potentially in serious danger of being stalked for scamming and most likely exposed to the Acc. Posted Image


That he's still attempting to threaten, bully and blackmail you, shows who he is.
3

#25 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 02 October 2013 - 09:15 PM

How trolls view women's complaints of death threats...


View PostREX, on 17 March 2013 - 11:00 PM, said:

Please post the offending post screenshot or due to your pathetic lying reputation on this forum we would be inclined to see this as JUST BULLSHIT from a maggot. Posted Image



An abuser, misogynist.

View PostREX, on 30 September 2013 - 02:22 PM, said:

No its merely their safety that we are concerned about as you prove that they are potentially in serious danger of being stalked for scamming and most likely exposed to the Acc. http://accforum.org/...default/dry.gif

3

#26 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 17 October 2013 - 10:26 AM

Neither did Mini, yet Butler is permitted to name her repeatedly. Why the double standards?

View Postnetcoachnz, on 30 September 2013 - 02:36 PM, said:

netcoachnz has never disclosed their real names publicly and you Blurb are potentially breaching a forum members right to Privacy & Personal Safety. Please be mindful you may be deemed to be breaking the law by continuing to call us by the name you are. You may be seen to be harassing and defaming an innocent person calling us the names you are. We request you refrain from addressing us by any other names than our http://www.accforum.org member name, which is netcoachnz




We involved our self in being part of a bulletin boards discussion no more no less. If you or others did not like what we posted then we suggest that you get a life. Your comment with regard legal action is viewed as intimidation and further bullying of netcoachnz by you Blurb.




Blurb, how can you possibly presume to know what netcoachnz has realized or thinks. We have kept a lower profile within this fine forum within the last few months due to ill health, thanks for your concern.



Again this is presumptive arrogance on your part Blurb. Netcoachnz has access to the same information as yourself by viewing a forum members details. We do not know the real names of forum members using an anonymous moniker.



Nothing illegal has happened that would want us to report the alleged information to the NZ Police. The information that we have would not assist the NZ Police.




Blurb, no one else will look after our own interests. Blurb, why are you getting abusive, are you unable to have sensible adult discussion and dialogue without making a personal attack.



Again Blurb, this is wild speculation on your part and bears nothing like the truth. We were sent some material about a certain forum member and asked for our comments. We proof read their document and added no new information, we do not know what happened to this information.




No forum members have stated any concern via PM system. We have been contacted to say thanks for the stand that we took on certain issues and the way we didn't let a forum member get away with their nonsense. We state again that what someone views as an attack we view as robust, adult discussion which is the purpose of a bulletin board.

Blurb, Netcoachnz is a genuine forum member.

2

#27 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 17 October 2013 - 10:58 AM

View PostRosey, on 17 October 2013 - 10:26 AM, said:

Neither did Mini, yet Butler is permitted to name her repeatedly. Why the double standards?




MINI
has been PUBLICLY INFORMED
That if she places libelous slanderous false publishing's based on whatever she uses as her evidence ,as her libel slander on against me then she shall be known in this public forum by her proper name
No LIBLE SLANDER ETC
No name of Mini by me
SIMPLE SOLUTION
LIBLE SLANDER with not an ounce of factor proof and fell lies based on assumptions guess;s gossip whatever then im afraid Rosey
a NAMED PERSON SHE WILL BE
THERE BE NO HIDING BEHIND AN ANON name of MINI to allow her to slander and libel at will as a no one
no double standards anywhere
lible slander with no proof
ill name her
no one sided anywhere at all
if i dont show her up as the LIAR LIBELOUS SLANDEROUS PERSON that she is out here -then thats one sided Rosey
and i aint allowing that to happen with her and others

davey
0

#28 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 17 October 2013 - 01:45 PM

View PostDavid Butler, on 17 October 2013 - 10:58 AM, said:

MINI
has been PUBLICLY INFORMED
That if she places libelous slanderous false publishing's based on whatever she uses as her evidence ,as her libel slander on against me then she shall be known in this public forum by her proper name
No LIBLE SLANDER ETC
No name of Mini by me
SIMPLE SOLUTION
LIBLE SLANDER with not an ounce of factor proof and fell lies based on assumptions guess;s gossip whatever then im afraid Rosey
a NAMED PERSON SHE WILL BE
THERE BE NO HIDING BEHIND AN ANON name of MINI to allow her to slander and libel at will as a no one
no double standards anywhere
lible slander with no proof
ill name her
no one sided anywhere at all
if i dont show her up as the LIAR LIBELOUS SLANDEROUS PERSON that she is out here -then thats one sided Rosey
and i aint allowing that to happen with her and others

davey


You're the one gossiping away to Nottingham.



2

#29 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 17 October 2013 - 03:25 PM

View PostRosey, on 17 October 2013 - 01:45 PM, said:

You're the one gossiping away to Nottingham.





Good EY
dont hear your name anywhere or the invalids you allege being being threatened.


DO YOU?????


Your a tad like Claire
YOU THINK YOU HEAR OR SEE , SOMETHING AND THEN YOU MAKE IT ALL UP AS GOSSIP
Now where i seen that happen before
oh yeah
thats right
the takapuna bomb plot was same= gossip made into a story BUT THEN THOSE LIKE YOU THAT ARE
SO THICKO
To leave all your personal stuff out open in facebook and other sites
well your easy meat to L/F
I did a run thru back then when you appeared and there you all were
as well as seeing the links to you profiles [public ones] in the forum here by you dumb ass;s PLUS Facebook etc you were ripe for the picking like strawberries
so fuck off and blame someone else
LIKE YA SELF RoseyPosted Image
Davey
1

#30 User is offline   greg 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1159
  • Joined: 15-September 03

Posted 17 October 2013 - 03:29 PM

Butler you have been proven never to have a death Threat again you from ACCforum.org ,
Why do you keep posting stuff you can't prove to be true.?
0

#31 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 17 October 2013 - 06:45 PM

View Postgreg, on 17 October 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:

Butler you have been proven never to have a death Threat again you from ACCforum.org ,
Why do you keep posting stuff you can't prove to be true.?


whats posted greg that you refer i post as to being not true
wheres it proven no death threat in forum against me greg
whom proved that
dont see ant evidence as you state there be ''never proven''

dave
0

#32 User is offline   greg 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1159
  • Joined: 15-September 03

Posted 17 October 2013 - 06:54 PM

Post it .. don't say anything you cant post in the thread .post it
go away if you claims are all bullshit like the others,,,,
0

#33 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 17 October 2013 - 07:35 PM

View Postgreg, on 17 October 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:

Butler you have been proven never to have a death Threat again you from ACCforum.org ,
Why do you keep posting stuff you can't prove to be true.?



View PostDavid Butler, on 17 October 2013 - 06:45 PM, said:

whats posted greg that you refer i post as to being not true
wheres it proven no death threat in forum against me greg
whom proved that
dont see ant evidence as you state there be ''never proven''

dave



View Postgreg, on 17 October 2013 - 06:54 PM, said:

Post it .. don't say anything you cant post in the thread .post it
go away if you claims are all bullshit like the others,,,,


Greg
ive never seen any proof of fact that a death threats never been made against me in here OR by any forum members
[after all accfroum.org is the members mate
what the fuck are you on about
re proof of fact
im the ;;''ONLY;;'' one in here who has published documents of fact re the plot/thomas issues youve arrived into recently =POLICE RATIFIED ONES so FUCK OFF RE me posting stuff i cant prove
ask miller why he tells lies about what the police ratified documents actually say
now theres a wee task for you seems ya poked ya nose in here re the Plots issues
Ask Miller to publish his evidence as he made it -show mine is bullshit as ya claiming of me


dave

davey
0

#34 User is offline   Campy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1386
  • Joined: 15-May 10
  • LocationAuckland Regional super city

Posted 17 October 2013 - 07:39 PM

Ah poor chemically dependent bikie gangster Davey boy...

View PostDavid Butler, on 17 October 2013 - 03:25 PM, said:

Good EY
dont hear your name anywhere or the invalids you allege being being threatened.


DO YOU?????


Your a tad like Claire
YOU THINK YOU HEAR OR SEE , SOMETHING AND THEN YOU MAKE IT ALL UP AS GOSSIP
Now where i seen that happen before
oh yeah
thats right
the takapuna bomb plot was same= gossip made into a story BUT THEN THOSE LIKE YOU THAT ARE
SO THICKO
To leave all your personal stuff out open in facebook and other sites
well your easy meat to L/F
I did a run thru back then when you appeared and there you all were
as well as seeing the links to you profiles [public ones] in the forum here by you dumb ass;s PLUS Facebook etc you were ripe for the picking like strawberries
so fuck off and blame someone else
LIKE YA SELF RoseyPosted Image
Davey

1

#35 User is offline   Campy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1386
  • Joined: 15-May 10
  • LocationAuckland Regional super city

Posted 17 October 2013 - 07:41 PM

Here's why.

View PostRosey, on 17 October 2013 - 10:26 AM, said:

Neither did Mini, yet Butler is permitted to name her repeatedly. Why the double standards?



1

#36 User is offline   hukildaspida 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 3353
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 10 February 2014 - 01:36 PM

Time for a refresh & please get the message.

View Posthukildaspida, on 24 September 2013 - 05:49 PM, said:

To whom it may concern please ensure this Personal Story Rests in Peace.

It, along with other topics about the same persons is well past it's use by date, is full of Personal Attacks & Abuse on those whom have chosen for whatever reason to never have anything to do with such persons.
(note persons is plural)


Please let it Rest in Peace and move on with your lives & to those whom are on http://www.accforum.org & interrelated sites 24/7/365 as some of you are please go and get a real job, at least part-time and a life.

If you can spend so much time online you can be contributing to society in a positive manner.

There as plenty of rebuilding jobs down here in Christchurch that some of you would be quite capable of doing,
or do you have Criminal Convictions in recent years that no one would want to employ you and not a Clean Slate yet?


Total Declinature Of Claim / Alan Thomas Allegations of working while incapacitated
http://accforum.org/...im-alan-thomas/

-2

#37 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 10 February 2014 - 10:49 PM

YOU'RE the reason Janice Karaka and other bedridden women are being harassed and threatened and now you want us to STFU? Get off your high horse you self righteous stuck up fat blonde s++t.

View Posthukildaspida, on 10 February 2014 - 01:36 PM, said:

Time for a refresh & please get the message.



0

#38 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 10 February 2014 - 10:52 PM

And spida has the cheek to tell us all to STFU. She's the reason bedridden women are being harassed and their lives threatened.

View Postjaffa, on 25 September 2013 - 12:11 AM, said:

Yes and janice karaka gets the death threats because Nottingham's blame her for hukildaspida.

0

#39 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 10 February 2014 - 10:53 PM

View Postjaffa, on 25 September 2013 - 12:32 AM, said:

The real janice karaka has received the death threats destined for you. Don't expect us to sit back while those responsible continue to defame and harass her for your sake.


Hukildaspida would love it to all go away as long as two other women, disabled, bedridden, are taking the rap for her self righteous arrogance.
0

#40 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 10 February 2014 - 10:53 PM

??
1

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users