ACCforum: Assessment Data Just Obtained - Du Plessis, Campbell and Lowe - ACCforum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Assessment Data Just Obtained - Du Plessis, Campbell and Lowe

#1 User is offline   servicetofreemen 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36
  • Joined: 26-July 11

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:20 PM

This data is obviously open to interpretation, as to what happened to those who were assessed. This is from a Government source. I obtained it from a friend. There has not been a correlation made - positive or negative- about the number of claimants exited, or attempted for exit and the number of assessment. ACC can easily generate this information, as any technology-based system has means to generate reports. Is it a case of: they do not want to find out OR they choose not to want to find out OR they have found out and not telling?


Number of assessments:

Year 2008 2009 2010 2011

Philippa Campbell 2 43 641 479
Carmen Lowe 67 201 206
Du Plessis 311 336 310 289
0

#2 User is offline   Empathy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 196
  • Joined: 13-September 12

Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:37 PM

Very interesting stuff Servicetofreemen, wow can you get more? So you are saying that P Campbell did 641 assessments in 2010 and 249 in 2011. No wonder they love ACC so much.How much do they gegt paid per assessment roughly. What would there hourly rates be?
0

#3 User is offline   servicetofreemen 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36
  • Joined: 26-July 11

Posted 02 March 2013 - 03:41 PM

View PostEmpathy, on 02 March 2013 - 12:37 PM, said:

Very interesting stuff Servicetofreemen, wow can you get more? So you are saying that P Campbell did 641 assessments in 2010 and 249 in 2011. No wonder they love ACC so much.How much do they gegt paid per assessment roughly. What would there hourly rates be?


You got the figures right. Apologies about how the figures ended up being presented. My source indicates approximately $2,000-$3,000 per claimant.
Did you notice Lowe's "accomplishments as well? She too is making a large huge sweep? Woo...hoo...hoo... This is probably on top of full time employment. There is nothing wrong about having more than one job. Good on her, as long as she was doing no harm. But I know through a contact that she does use some "subtle tactics" that make ACC label claimants as non-compliant.
0

#4 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 02 March 2013 - 04:08 PM

View PostEmpathy, on 02 March 2013 - 12:37 PM, said:

<br>Very interesting stuff Servicetofreemen, wow can you get more? So you are saying that P Campbell did 641 assessments in 2010 and 249 in 2011. No wonder they love ACC so much.How much do they gegt paid per assessment roughly. What would there hourly rates be?<br>
<div>There is a definite swing 2010[circa]by Campbell from the likes of the Kennedys reports, who are bad but Campbell appears to have refined the procedure upped the ante,mid 2010 thru to 2011 and still going at it She makes the job very easy for the De Plessis the Stoners etc as well with her trickery the RIS unit they must have a permanent telefone for her only they chat away together like old buddies be interesting if the amount of actual acc contracted Vocational assessing done by Southern Rehabilitation Ltd were shown now how many is the question that were the end of be all by Campbell to send the claimant to Vocational next stop along the line that ended up being done by Southern Rehab who is Campbell One would be to many

</div>
0

#5 User is offline   MG 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 503
  • Joined: 05-February 04

Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:43 PM

IMHO, ACC knows, precisely, how many claimants lost their entitlements after assessments by these three characters, as it does with every assessor it pays to assess claimants. It refuses to tell anyone, of course, because the implications are so damaging (think Trapski x 15,000 or so). The next government must get to the truth of this, one way or another. It is the only way New Zealanders will ever be able to re-establish trust in their political representatives. I think the Trapski model is an excellent way to go (the investigator interviews complainants, and witnesses, alone and without lawyers for the other side).
0

#6 User is offline   Empathy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 196
  • Joined: 13-September 12

Posted 03 March 2013 - 12:10 PM

This current government is not interested, Privacy Issues just a smoke screen. ACC has't changed one little bit, in fact it seems to have got worse.
0

#7 User is offline   Rosey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1808
  • Joined: 25-December 09
  • LocationHamilton

Posted 03 March 2013 - 12:12 PM

Bump

View PostMG, on 02 March 2013 - 06:43 PM, said:

IMHO, ACC knows, precisely, how many claimants lost their entitlements after assessments by these three characters, as it does with every assessor it pays to assess claimants. It refuses to tell anyone, of course, because the implications are so damaging (think Trapski x 15,000 or so). The next government must get to the truth of this, one way or another. It is the only way New Zealanders will ever be able to re-establish trust in their political representatives. I think the Trapski model is an excellent way to go (the investigator interviews complainants, and witnesses, alone and without lawyers for the other side).

0

#8 User is offline   David Butler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3370
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 28 November 2013 - 01:23 PM

View Postservicetofreemen, on 01 March 2013 - 10:20 PM, said:

This data is obviously open to interpretation, as to what happened to those who were assessed. This is from a Government source. I obtained it from a friend. There has not been a correlation made - positive or negative- about the number of claimants exited, or attempted for exit and the number of assessment. ACC can easily generate this information, as any technology-based system has means to generate reports. Is it a case of: they do not want to find out OR they choose not to want to find out OR they have found out and not telling?


Number of assessments:

Year 2008 2009 2010 2011

Philippa Campbell 2 43 641 479
Carmen Lowe 67 201 206
Du Plessis 311 336 310 289



View Postservicetofreemen, on 02 March 2013 - 03:41 PM, said:

You got the figures right. Apologies about how the figures ended up being presented. My source indicates approximately $2,000-$3,000 per claimant.
Did you notice Lowe's "accomplishments as well? She too is making a large huge sweep? Woo...hoo...hoo... This is probably on top of full time employment. There is nothing wrong about having more than one job. Good on her, as long as she was doing no harm. But I know through a contact that she does use some "subtle tactics" that make ACC label claimants as non-compliant.


The figures relating to Phillipa Ann Campbell -[uses the last name TIE often. do make an interesting scenario.
Ms Campbell is a director /shareholder of Southern Rehabilitation Institute Ltd-
and Southern Rehabilitation Alliance Ltd [a Dalliance it appears of Physiotherapy ones with the usual names appearing within .]
One would assume that if the account was sent by Southern Rehab -with Campbell as a director owner/for services rendered then Southern Rehab would be the one entity that was then given as a name by the ACC in the figures shown as being the total number of assessments ''were'' done within the umbrella of Southern Rehab and the figures relate to monie's paid to Southern Rehab which ''must'' then include other professions' working for /on behalf of southern rehab

On the basis of that it then seems that the figure /number given for say 2010 of Campbell ,being 641 assessments would be work carried out by PHILLIPPA CAMPBELL herself -under the umbrella of Southern Rehab BUT as one independent of Southern Rehab but ''operating'' under the umbrella of that entity.

641 ASSESSMENTs IN ONE Calendar YEAR
Thats a lot-HOW CAN THIS BE CORRECT?
Being that it is said an average of 2/3 thou per assessment and working on an average Minimum of 20 hours total for an extensive COMPLEX neruo assessment [ @ a 10 HOURS minimum for the initial interview and the following complex assessing and what MUST be at least 10 -dealing with acc/admin /analyzing results /setting out reports results etc -to end up with some 30 plus pages of bullshit as a report -we end up at a figure of a ''VERY'' minimum 20 hours without getting to technical-
That co- relates to info from four particular definite recorded assessments done by Campbell -used to do this exercise altho more are available to do the same with.
The figure of 641 assessments is then quite an alarming figure to be looked at
641 assessments /20 plus hours each working time=mmm?
356 days in a year without a day off 641 assessments==.1.75 completed assessments @ average of 20 hours time involved of an assessment per claimant
There are only 24 hours in a day =now we all know that no one works 24/7
averaging the number of productive hours for self employed we would arrive at a minimum figure of 52 weeks by 5 days -Self employed know that dont work at all but we leave it a 5 days a week -allowing her to work easter time / xmas time / public holidays / and have no sleep at all ,for this exercise which brings the assessments DAYS available to 260 days and 641 assessments=nearly 2.5 assessments per day -a 20 hours each = 50 hours in a 24 hour day=
who the fuck is doing all the work=12 assessment pre week
cant be campbell herself
she does the assessments herself she must do them
so again who is writing all the reports up
the state they are in it cant be campbell but someone else using cut paste methods using campbells notes which are basically unreadable anyway which would be why there is are so may inaccurate and false laid info within her reports
does any one else find this an odd situation where 641 reports are done paid for by acc and all in a period of a year of a max of 365 days.
it is impossible to carry out complex assessments of such a number of 641 in a 52 week period all by her lonesome
No one else sees or interviews the claimants but Campbell herself-she cant have others doing that work anyway as she is the alleged expert neuropsychologist doing the complex testing for acc.

To put in another way to look easier at this issue but needs her to work 365 DAYS of the year which she DONT.
365 days in a year *24 hours a day
=8760 hours in total for the year to be alive and work
thus 8760 hours and 641 assessments = 13.6 hours per assessment


complex assessing with the claimant alone takes a minimum of 10 hours-
interview minimum of two /half plus hours
testing basic be - two days of three hours with another interview catch up or check on issues arising-may be longer/shorter time-but say 2.5 hours again= [3 ]+[6]+[2.5 plus ] approx 11.5 hours before she even starts the analysis of results etc -and compiling the report hours
weird who is doing the other hours with the actual reports then to get this bollocks back to acc notwithstanding that it is all seemingly done within a 7 day week useage of time
sure is weird
especially when you sight the damage this bitch is doing to acc claimants with false made up reports in such a mess and using cut paste methods with the same old same old data as a base to justify her findings being within claimants reports [who the claimants are all injured to differing degrees and varying difficulties in life]
it is easy to see how she is doing this with a ONE track finding to escape her slackassness of assessing but making heaps of loot whilst she is doing this activity which is in my opinion -is outright fraudulent activity with the use of false info contained in reports by campbell.
Re the well known Toadie Heggarty who is noted in another thread
hes a mate of acc and campbell ,Shown via ACC documentation being bought in -underhandedly covertly at that=at request of acc to assist Campbell NOT in a manner to assist of her assessing reporting data etc but to assist her to escape a mess she laid herself into- so Heggarty was used to intimidate the claimant on behalf of acc for the benefit of the ACC and particularly Ms Campbell
Whilst Campbell did very well re the september 2010 quakes and her machine rolled on nicely for her and the acc =In respect to the lower number of assessments done the next year -2011, one can see why this is.February earthquakes shut down the Campbell machine for a time but alas-she was up operation doing more SHONKY assessments whilst the building was damaged under repair/parts unusable and of all thing carrying out complex testing whilst the earthquakes were still rolling in on the hour.
However
IF the numbers are for a Financial year which they should be then the set looks far worse as that would make the 2010 year lump in the September 2010 quakes along with the February 2011 quakes periods of assessment procedures inactivity.which ill not bother to work out that lot as it will piss me off more than it does now.




In the words of a security guard stopping a claimant from getting near the buildings
Security -# ''where ya going mate''
claimant>''in there''
#[standing nervously well away from the buildings he said-]
''well i wouldn't be going in there if i was you''
''cant you see it is damaged -propped up with formwork supports holding most of it up-and the security fencing all round the building''



alas
If claimant dont go in and one is immediately Non Compliant as acc -well they just never gave a f about the assessment conditions and the quakes going on while claimants were being shafted by one=
PHILLIPPA CAMPBELL /TIE of Southern Rehabilitation Services operating out of St George's Hospital grounds -being located within the LenIster Chambers buildings Christchurch Canterbury

PP
One should check out there web site as the list of providers showing in there links them all with SRInstitute so who is running the whole she bang wiht the acc contracts they have
and whom is feeding whom back to the SRI Ltd based outfit of Southern Rehab Alliance of phyiso's WHICH IS Owned by guess who.


revisiting and getting back to going right up ms Campbell-re the many issues she has created for some claimants down here-and her nasty crap tactics, i came across some work sheets data re what ive posted above =IT screwed my head to pieces for a while back then and still does -so it mite be hard to get round how ive placed this info but the basics are
Phillipa Campbell had done a lot of assessments and on her own there just aint enough time available in a year to do it all.

as a short version
365 days -641 assessments=1.75 fully completed assessments -on and on -each day-full on ] for 365 days.Posted Image

dave.
0

#9 User is offline   unit1of2 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 869
  • Joined: 20-March 12

Posted 28 November 2013 - 03:02 PM

Katie Taylor is a co- worker, probably shareholder.. lol... OR understudy.. OR ... OR .. Well she does the same 'type' of assessments to... So be warned folks.

A word I saw
, 'iatrogenesis'... among other things... about a report I saw.

Du Plessis reports out of his scope. And IMHO with no 'real tested facts'... to back himself up either.. Copies copious amounts of garbled goobly degoop... that doesn't make sense because it's all a falicy that he's contrived and insists on using incorrect information, and his own dodgy reporting of so called test methods. A small example, when asked to hop, meaning one foot held raised whilst balanced on the other and asked to jump off the floor pushing up off that one foot, and the persons not able to get the foot off the floor, not for the want of trying. DuPlessis will report something like, 'unaided, can easily hop'. Such crap like this is ongoing and gets worse...


Just like the SRS lot... goes on and on and on... and pulling in the $$$$$$'s


0

#10 User is offline   unit1of2 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 869
  • Joined: 20-March 12

Posted 28 November 2013 - 03:08 PM

View Postservicetofreemen, on 02 March 2013 - 03:41 PM, said:

You got the figures right. Apologies about how the figures ended up being presented. My source indicates approximately $2,000-$3,000 per claimant.
Did you notice Lowe's "accomplishments as well? She too is making a large huge sweep? Woo...hoo...hoo... This is probably on top of full time employment. There is nothing wrong about having more than one job. Good on her, as long as she was doing no harm. But I know through a contact that she does use some "subtle tactics" that make ACC label claimants as non-compliant.



Yes and they still get paid aprox $1,200 - $2,500 for reporting a non event after cancelling on the claimant.. Boy oh boy don't they all have alot to say about the claimant there after to ACC..... I suppose they have to justify still getting the $'s (though for no actual real work done.....) Smells of very dodgy practices to me... IMHO
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users