Posted 29 October 2004 - 06:21 PM
The Corporation must provide information to the claimant about—
(a)the rehabilitation to which the claimant may be entitled - Schedule 1, clause 7(1)(a) of the Act.
So ask them to provide this to you in writing. If you subsequently find you may have been entitled to rehab that they did not tell you about, then you will have a right to review the plan. Even if outside the normal 3 month time limit for applying for a review of decision, you can argue that you have extenuating circumstances that allow an out-of-time review because ACC did not tell you about what rehab you may have been entitled to.
Talk to your GP and any specialist you regularly see about what rehab he or she thinks might be appropriate for you. The following persons must be given an opportunity to participate in the preparation and costing of the plan to the extent that they are willing and able to do so:
(a)the claimant:
(b)any . . . medical practitioner providing treatment to the claimant: - Schedule 1, clause 7(3) of the Act. Then ask ACC to agree to whatever they recommend should be in you plan. The onus is on ACC to involve the medical practitioners. If they do not, and everything turns to custard down the track, you again have the right to review the plan and decisions such as vocational independence that may flow from it.
If you have been on ACC for 10 years, it is very likely you will need to be retrained to have any chance of gaining employment in a job that you are medically capable of doing. Talk to the occupational assesor about what you might want to do and what retraining you think might be necessary for you to do it. ACC hate providing genuine retraining for claimants, because it is expensive, so it is important to try to get the occupational assessor to make a strong recommendation regarding this - not just to list some menial jobs that you might have the skills to do. They are required to rehabilitate you to your maximum participation, given your injury, so insist on this. Retraining should not be just a 16 hour computer course that leaves you with no real skills to help you gain emloyment.
If you do not think you can do jobs identified in the IOA for 35 hours a week, make sure you tell the medical assessor this, and the reason you do not think you cannot do them.
After the IMA and IOA, ACC will write up a draft revised plan based on the recommendations. Try to negotiate entitlements that you think you should be getting into it. If ACC do not agree to this, they can deem the plan to be finalised. If you then do not agree with the deemed finalised plan, then apply for a review of it.
Alternatively, you could do what I did and sign a rehab plan know it to be unlawful (my recent one had no medical practitioner involvement, no advice of the right to a support person, was drawn up without an IOA or IMA, no advice of rehab I might be entitled to, and I was given no review rights), knowing that if everything turns to turds down the track, the rehab plan and everything that follows is unlawful and that after a review they would have to start all over again.
But I would suggest you only do this if you are very confident, after taking legal advice, that the plan is actually unlawful.