ACCforum: WorkSafe Fraud - ACCforum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

WorkSafe Fraud

#1 User is offline   hukildaspida 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 3353
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 21 December 2012 - 10:21 AM

Would he have been entitled to abated earnings if he did have reduced capacity & earnings due to his original injuries?

There is of course considerable difference in the amount of driving a Sales rep does & that of someone working in a Car sales yard


Friday 05 October 2012
Worker pleads guilty to WorkSafe fraud

http://www.worksafen...safe-fraud.html

CATEGORIES

Incidents & Prosecutions
Compensation & Insurance
All Metro

TAGS

investigation
Fined
fraud

A worker receiving compensation benefits for a back injury while working in a caryard has been ordered to repay more than $55,000 and perform 350 hours of unpaid community work.

Reinhart Schmid, of Sunbury, pleaded guilty at the Broadmeadows Magistrates’ Court this week to fraudulently obtaining payments and false information under the Accident Compensation Act 1985.

The court heard Mr Schmid injured his back in September 2008 while getting into his car during his employment as a sales representative. He continued to work on modified duties, but almost a year later claimed his injury had worsened and had to cease all employment.

While receiving weekly compensation benefits for his injury, surveillance carried out in August 2010 found Mr Schmid working at a Coburg North car sales business, where he was seen driving and maintaining vehicles.

Following an independent medical examination, where he falsely stated he wasn’t working, his compensation payments were terminated.

Mr Schmid received $55,530 in weekly payments from WorkSafe from July 2009 to December 2010.

The Executive Director of WorkSafe’s Injury Support and Service Division, Len Boehm,
said fraud undermined legitimately injured workers and employers whose insurance premiums were the backbone of the system.

“This sentence should send a strong message to the community that fraud is serious and when detected, it will be investigated and lead to a prosecution,” he said.

“The courts are taking this issue seriously and while working and receiving benefits is permissible, claimants must advise WorkSafe so any adjustments can be made.”

Mr Schmid was ordered to repay $55,530 as well as $3700 in legal costs. He will serve 350 hours of unpaid community work over a two-year period as part of a Community Corrections Order. No conviction was recorded.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users