Incidently what is wrong with been a nark, as in an "Informant" to the Authorities?
Crime and suspected Crime or unlawful acts are exactly that and we all have a moral & legal obligation of reporting alleged offences and that what we know has been knowingly & intentionally carried out that is unlawful.
As an example a small portion of what we have unashamedly over the years have reported included car thefts, unlawful entering of buildings, dangerous driving, forgery, dishonesty offences, child abuse - where a mother had sex with her 14 year old son and also left her children whom were both under the age of 16 home alone whilst she went out regulary drinking to the point of chronic intoxication and causing disorder, knowing someone was going to chop down a protected Magnolia Tree that was planted around 1870's on privately owned and Historic Places Trust registered property, etc.
Do you have an issue with us been a nark, as in an informant, for doing that?
hukildaspida -
Advanced Member
PipPipPip
Group: Members
Posts: 289
Joined: 24-August 07
Posted 03 August 2011 - 11:10 PM
View Postkeentohelp, on 03 August 2011 - 05:19 PM, said:
Accforum is a dangerous place for anyone insecure in his or her ACC relationship.
I am always fascinated by some members concerns that ACC know various members names.
It is pretty clear that some fairly prominent and frequently posting members like nothing better than to try to post members names.
Whether or not they have got it right (I wish to preserve my anonymity on accforum) the following members (among others) have 'attempted' to name me and none should be trusted when it comes to divulging personal information:
Sparrow
Huggy
Hukildaspida
Doppelganger.
Clearly those members are equally as bad as the others referred to on this thread.
It is unclear but I sometimes suspect one or two of them also volunteer information of one sort or another to ACC - anything to get attention perhaps.
Hukildaspida's original post
Truth hurts does it KTH?
Hukildaspida is unashamed to be a nark and an honest person whom has contacts in places you could only dream about.
Don't think our contacts, including "Senior Sergeant Secret Squirrell" & his team of officers be too impressed you speak of us with ill-will.
What was that Supertramp song "Dreamer, nothing but a dreamer..", about you is it KTH?
Incidently there are more than enough posts online on http://www.accforum.org under all your various names that leads people directly to knowing whom you are & whom you work for & are related to.
Have a great sleep

And then this post worded in Keentohelp's own words
keentohelp
Advanced Member
PipPipPip
Group: Members
Posts: 253
Joined: 26-February 04
Posted 04 August 2011 - 11:57 AM
View PostHuggy, on 04 August 2011 - 09:27 AM, said:
KTH you are one weird person.
My apologies Huggy I got the name wrong (not weird here but in error) and have corrected the post.
It should have read:
Thankyou for the confirmation that narking is both present and admired on accforum Hukildaspida.
Truth is an excellent virtue.
I am fully in favour of it.
So is the keeping of agreements made – such as that we have agreed to when joining accforum – see the rules posted in the General Lounge.
Hukildaspida wrote, post # 86, above:
“Hukildaspida is unashamed to be a nark and an honest person whom has contacts in places you could only dream about.”
Okay, I guess if you are in favour of narks on accforum then you have every reason to support Hukildaspida in being a nark.
If narking and breaking agreements and informing on people are virtues then I guess the aforementioned Sparrow, Huggy, Hukildaspida and Doppelganger are, as someone else has suggested above, ‘top of the class’.
Your post confirms what I had written, post # 83 above:
“Accforum is a dangerous place for anyone insecure in his or her ACC relationship.
I am always fascinated by some members concerns that ACC know various members names.
It is pretty clear that some fairly prominent and frequently posting members like nothing better than to try to post members names.
Whether or not they have got it right (I wish to preserve my anonymity on accforum) the following members (among others) have 'attempted' to name me and none should be trusted when it comes to divulging personal information:
Sparrow
Huggy
Hukildaspida
Doppelganger.
Clearly those members are equally as bad as the others referred to on this thread.
It is unclear but I sometimes suspect one or two of them also volunteer information of one sort or another to ACC - anything to get attention perhaps.”
BE WARNED EVERYONE – ACCFORUM IS NOT ONLY A HAVEN FOR NARKS BUT A PLACE WHERE NARKS ARE WIDELY ADMIRED.
Accforum is clearly a dangerous place for anyone insecure in his or her ACC relationship.
Hukildapsida:Keentohelp you have made an assumption about our comment about "Going to top of our class", it is a tongue-in-cheek comment.
AND then this post by Keentohelp
keentohelp
Advanced Member
PipPipPip
Group: Members
Posts: 253
Joined: 26-February 04
Posted 05 August 2011 - 06:27 PM
With the number of narks on accforum (I mean specifically those who have admitted to being so and those who support them being so) do you think that any of them 'feed' information to the various Private Investigators that ACC use all over he country?
See http://accforum.org/...s-posting-safe/
I notice Hukildaspida (see http://accforum.org/...ws/page__st__80) was boasting that he/she is proud to be a nark and likes to nark to people who the rest of us wouldn't even dream of.
I often wonder how ACC and/or its PI's get the information they start from.
Are those ACC PI's included in his/her list of people to nark to?
Hukildapsida is baffled how their posts have been so twisted out of what they were originally by Keentohelp.
Presumptions and assumptions are different than the facts.
We request a public apology from Keentohelp.