ACCforum: Sexual Abuse Assessments - ACCforum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Sexual Abuse Assessments ACC OverKill.

#1 User is offline   Tomcat 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2158
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 14 August 2004 - 08:36 PM

ON BEHALF OF Jane.

ACC IS FORCING MANY SEXUAL ABUSE VICTIMS TO GO THRU AN EXCESSIVE
NUMBER OF ASSESSMENTS, REGARDING MENTAL INJURY.
CAN OTHERS POST HERE WHO THEY HAVE BEEN TO AND THE QUALITY OF THE REPORT.
WERE YOU ASSESSED BY A PSYCHOLOGIST OR A PSYCHIATRIST.?
HAS ANYONE BEEN TO JAMES WEBB.? IS HE AN ACC TOADY.?
WHAT IS JACKIE PIVAC, MANAGER OF SENSITIVE CLAIMS LIKE.?
WHAT EXPERIENCES HAVE YOU HAD AT THE INSENSITIVE CLAIMS UNIT.?
PLEASE COMMENT
JANE.
1

#2 User is offline   doppelganger 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1706
  • Joined: 19-September 03

Posted 14 August 2004 - 11:04 PM

I don't hink that it is just limited ti sexaul abuse victims TC there is a lot of abuse to a wide sector of victims at the ACC. th corporation staff are going through a policy that in the public would be classed as harrasement. the corporation play's on the mental attitude of there own staff and inturn on the claiments.

I personally know of the ACC targing other groups with a simular problem.
0

#3 User is offline   raelala 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-May 04

  Posted 15 August 2004 - 03:53 PM

yes i have to go to a physiatrist on the 30th of august a mr miller in ch-ch, my lawyer has organized it for me, but that is all i know so far, i have been fighting a.c.c. since 1980!!! for sexual abuse, but they are making me sicker than i was in the first place as i have had so many assesments and reports to them, and what i want to know is what are they looking for???? and how do you prove sexual abuse?? when they dont accept these assesments and reports!!!, and keep making you do them over and over, surely that is abuse in itself!!, i can and have named him!!, i am now 58, and getting no where fast and just need some closure in my old age, and am fast running out of fight, hope you have better luck than i am having, and am with you all the way, cheers.
1

#4 User is offline   karlasmum11111 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 04-August 04

Posted 21 September 2004 - 10:19 PM

i abandoned my sexual abuse claim many many years ago.
Once i realised my 'sensitive' claim wasnt the LEAST bit sensitive and was availavble to all and sundry i scrapped it.
On 2 occasions, 1 at a neurologist, the other at a psychologist ironically for a back injury, NOTHING to do with abuse I was asked some VERY VERY personal questions about things that happened to me that were specific and could only be known through access to my files.
I was that offended i scrapped it and never looked back.
1

#5 User is offline   ANG :) 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 15-September 03

  Posted 26 January 2005 - 07:20 AM

ALISON MALONEY IS NOW THE MANAGER
SHE'S DUE TO HAVE A BABY SOON
WAS AT NORTHWOOD BRANCH
0

#6 User is offline   DARRELLGEMMA 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 445
  • Joined: 03-February 07

Posted 08 March 2007 - 05:34 PM

View PostTomcat, on Aug 14 2004, 09:36 PM, said:

ON BEHALF OF Jane.

ACC IS FORCING MANY SEXUAL ABUSE VICTIMS TO GO THRU AN EXCESSIVE
NUMBER OF ASSESSMENTS, REGARDING MENTAL INJURY.
CAN OTHERS POST HERE WHO THEY HAVE BEEN TO AND THE QUALITY OF THE REPORT.
WERE YOU ASSESSED BY A PSYCHOLOGIST OR A PSYCHIATRIST.?
HAS ANYONE BEEN TO JAMES WEBB.? IS HE AN ACC TOADY.?
WHAT IS JACKIE PIVAC, MANAGER OF SENSITIVE CLAIMS LIKE.?
WHAT EXPERIENCES HAVE YOU HAD AT THE INSENSITIVE CLAIMS UNIT.?
PLEASE COMMENT
JANE.

They sure can because they control the assessment process & review process as well as the peer review process. You can choose who you want to see not them. I haven't been to James Webb but i will tell you who i have been too.
1998 Doctor Michelle Todd She is not worth seeing because she takes too long to a report whether it be because of maternity leave or having the flu unacceptable & does not how to apportion a claim properly.
2000 Doctor John Collier doesn't take into account a claimants opinion about how sexual abuse has affected them & does not apportion the claim at all.
2004 Doctor John Collier as i pointed above.
2006 Doctor Noeline Tanner Like Doctor Todd is not worth seeing because she apportions a large chunk of a claim & then comes out & admits that apportionment is hardest part when doing assessments because it is a stumbling block & therefore it should not apply to anybody's sensitve claim.
All these assessors are acc toady's.
Regards.
Darrell Pearce.
1

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users