Reputation: 776 Excellent
- Active Posts:
- 7664 (3.02 per day)
- Most Active In:
- General Lounge (2782 posts)
- 10-June 06
- Profile Views:
- Last Active:
- Member Title:
- Advanced Member
- Age Unknown
- Birthday Unknown
- Not Telling
- Click here to e-mail me
Posts I've Made
Yesterday, 06:14 PMMike Dixon-McIver; ACC Advocate
On TV 1 7pm
Yesterday, 03:25 PMDon't shoot me I'm only the piano player.
There are pie makers and pie cutters.
Like a pie maker I designed and built machinery which required a rigid discipline of obedience to laws of physics and mathematics, no exceptions no excuses.
All too frequently play cutters take advantage of the pie makers.
Yesterday, 02:19 PMKeen to help I do what law-abiding citizens do.
I process the matters through the court.
Your suggestion of going to the administer is ridiculous as the minister has no control whatsoever of the day-to-day administration of the ACC, the ACC fraud unit or the private investigators.
Judges make a decision in isolation related to the case that is before them. Judges are not influenced by politics which is the same as the ACC administration.
If you want to win the war first you need to comprehend the command structure. Usually countries engaged in war is because there are differences in the legal structures. We in New Zealand are subject to laws and are in no position to fight the law but rather ensure that the law is applied correctly. More often than not disharmony within the country and matters dealing with bureaucrats is when the bureaucrats operate outside of the law. It is very unusual for the laws themselves to be inherently wrong to any great degree.
The ACC act has remained much the same from the beginning with the exceptions of improvements to the wording of the act so as to force administrators and bureaucrats to do their jobs properly so as to maintain the original intent of the ACC Act.
Nowhere in the ACC act as a suggestThat the ACC should build a network of spies managed by private investigators. The administration of the act is described within the act and the ACC should focus their daily activities on what the act requires them to do. This protest is about bureaucrats acting outside of the act.
Yesterday, 12:59 PMKeen to help it is obvious that you have not been in a position to receive any the documentation produced by the ACC in relation to the fraud unit nor, as I have, examined both ACC staff and that the fraud unit in court.
Consistent with most multibillion-dollar corporations the employees contract third parties to act as a firewall to their instructions, Which in the cases we generally talk about ACC assesses, private investigators and suchlike. In Huggies case ACC instructed the private investigator to obtain a search warrant despite the fact that there was no lawful grounds to acquire a search warrant. It was a fishing expedition. Nonetheless the private investigator took it upon himself to obtain a search warrant by unlawful means in as much as he misrepresented the information to the police. I note that the private investigator into an established a firewall between himself and a search warrant by making the police the fall guy, a relative no less.
The spending protest is about a man who was falsely accused by the ACC. The ACC uses vast resources to "barbecue" him. Despite the ACC despicable actions being identified the ACC have gone to shutdown mode as a mechanism to avoid liability even further. My case has gone more than 20 years. This man is much older and does not have that long to live.
Yesterday, 12:11 PMThing is, Alan Thomas, Leo Durocher did not say that in relation to talent and skill.
Someone like yourself who finds himself laughed out of court and generally derided (and as 'last' as anyone is going to get) is going to come last whatever their (your) personality profile.
Given your predilection though for threatening all sorts of people with court action (which never anyway eventuates, lol) you certainly do not qualify as ‘nice’.
I would also guess you are lonely and single – attributes not found widely amongst those who do qualify.
Keen to help can you cite any examples of me accusing anybody of something other than me merely defending myself from their accusation?
You appear to suggest that it is not nice to seek a legal remedy to someone's attacks. This seems to be the hallmark thinking of a cowardly cyber bully.