ACCforum: Total Declinature Of Claim / Alan Thomas - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 818 Pages +
  • « First
  • 816
  • 817
  • 818
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Total Declinature Of Claim / Alan Thomas Allegations of working while incapacitated

#16341 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 28 April 2017 - 07:37 PM



Anonymousey, good luck you'll need it.


0

#16342 User is offline   greg 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 972
  • Joined: 15-September 03

Posted 28 April 2017 - 09:02 PM

Tomcat

Advanced Member
PipPipPip
Group:Members
Posts:2152
Joined:14-September 03
Posted 10 October 2008 - 09:05 PM
THE "PLOT DOTH THICKEN BY THE DAY" :P ;) :lol:
(have wondered when this would manifest)...

ACCTRUST was supposed to cease to exist and info transferred to the forum...
this didnt happen...
NOW MY "SUSPICIONS" have been confirmed...

http://accforum.org/...4655#entry74655
0

#16343 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6770
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 28 April 2017 - 09:31 PM

View PostMINI, on 28 April 2017 - 12:06 PM, said:

alan Thomas

By the look of the documentation put up here by doppeldanger of your foray into money making business' before Accforum.org, it would appear there were nut cases here long before a few of us knew you!! You the original nut case, maybe that is why everyone thinks you have access/admin status under Alan Thomas name or and other Aka you may have. Must keep it to show the powers that be.

mini


What an earth makes you think that that was a moneymaking business?

What do you sent was wrong with my attempts to help my fellow man with ACC matters? Were there technical/legal errors that you can point to?
0

#16344 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6770
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 28 April 2017 - 09:36 PM

View Postgreg, on 28 April 2017 - 09:02 PM, said:

Tomcat

Advanced Member
PipPipPip
Group:Members
Posts:2152
Joined:14-September 03
Posted 10 October 2008 - 09:05 PM
THE "PLOT DOTH THICKEN BY THE DAY"
(have wondered when this would manifest)...

ACCTRUST was supposed to cease to exist and info transferred to the forum...
this didnt happen...
NOW MY "SUSPICIONS" have been confirmed...

http://accforum.org/...4655#entry74655


"ACCTRUST was supposed to cease to exist and info transferred to the forum...
this didnt happen."


Greg what on earth are you talking about?
0

#16345 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10725
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 29 April 2017 - 09:25 AM

Alan

You are pathetic at remembering what you wrote...

True narcisstic denial......

You wrote of an 0800 that was actually an 0900...

And you are not - by law - allowed to advocate....neither you, dermot or rex...

Why have posts / threads / abuse by certain members been pulled down

A search on their name shiws no postings at all


You cannot hide the past

Some of us have saved this whole thread in its original state.....

Every piece of garbage written..
0

#16346 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10725
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 29 April 2017 - 09:27 AM

 Battleaxe, on 28 April 2017 - 07:37 PM, said:



Anonymousey, good luck you'll need it.





NO SHE WONT.......

SHE HAS NOT BROKEN ANY LAWS

NOR HDCA STANDARDS...

MORE THREATS....!

BY BIG RED SHOUTY DRAMA QUEEN
0

#16347 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10725
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 29 April 2017 - 11:13 AM

SHE CHANGES THE SUBJECT MATTER EVERY TIME SHES "BEATEN"...battleaxe

Much the same as David Butker aka Hemi aka H8Acc


AND IN THE EXACT SAME PATTERN AS ALAN THOMAS...HER MENTOR...ONE OF THEM AT LEAST



HOW NARCISSITICALLY PREDICTABLE...

ITS LIKE WATCHING ALAN AND DAVID ALL OVER AGAIN....

BUT NOW 1000'S INCRIMINATING POSTS HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY DESTROYED...


ATTACK
ASSERT
DENY
ASSERT
WORDSMITH
CHANGE SUBJECT
ATTACK
ASSERT
DENY
WORDSMITH


THE NARCISSISTS PATTERN........
0

#16348 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 29 April 2017 - 01:15 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 29 April 2017 - 11:13 AM, said:

SHE CHANGES THE SUBJECT MATTER EVERY TIME SHES "BEATEN"...battleaxe

Much the same as David Butker aka Hemi aka H8Acc


AND IN THE EXACT SAME PATTERN AS ALAN THOMAS...HER MENTOR...ONE OF THEM AT LEAST



HOW NARCISSITICALLY PREDICTABLE...

ITS LIKE WATCHING ALAN AND DAVID ALL OVER AGAIN....

BUT NOW 1000'S INCRIMINATING POSTS HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY DESTROYED...


ATTACK
ASSERT
DENY
ASSERT
WORDSMITH
CHANGE SUBJECT
ATTACK
ASSERT
DENY
WORDSMITH


THE NARCISSISTS PATTERN........

0

#16349 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 29 April 2017 - 01:15 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 29 April 2017 - 09:27 AM, said:

NO SHE WONT.......

SHE HAS NOT BROKEN ANY LAWS

NOR HDCA STANDARDS...

MORE THREATS....!

BY BIG RED SHOUTY DRAMA QUEEN






Posted Today, 10:27 AM

Battleaxe, on 28 April 2017 - 08:37 PM, said:



Anonymousey, good luck you'll need it.





NO SHE WONT.......

SHE HAS NOT BROKEN ANY LAWS

NOR HDCA STANDARDS...

MORE THREATS....!

BY BIG RED SHOUTY DRAMA QUEEN

0

#16350 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 29 April 2017 - 01:16 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 29 April 2017 - 09:27 AM, said:

NO SHE WONT.......

SHE HAS NOT BROKEN ANY LAWS

NOR HDCA STANDARDS...

MORE THREATS....!

BY BIG RED SHOUTY DRAMA QUEEN

0

#16351 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10725
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 29 April 2017 - 01:27 PM

TROLLING AGAIN....
0

#16352 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 29 April 2017 - 04:51 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 29 April 2017 - 01:27 PM, said:

TROLLING AGAIN....




Yes, you certainly are trolling again NTV.
0

#16353 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 29 April 2017 - 04:52 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 29 April 2017 - 01:27 PM, said:

TROLLING AGAIN....

0

#16354 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10725
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted Yesterday, 09:28 AM

You are bogging alans precious posts

He doesnt like that
0

#16355 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted Yesterday, 12:03 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 30 April 2017 - 09:28 AM, said:

You are bogging alans precious posts

He doesnt like that

0

#16356 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted Yesterday, 12:04 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 30 April 2017 - 09:28 AM, said:

You are bogging alans precious posts

He doesnt like that




Alan, like everyone else at this forum, is quite capable of speaking for himself. You are not the official forum spokesperson and your presumption that you are is very wrong NTV. Again, take your nose out of other people's business.
0

#16357 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10725
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted Yesterday, 12:12 PM

 Battleaxe, on 30 April 2017 - 12:04 PM, said:



Alan, like everyone else at this forum, is quite capable of speaking for himself. You are not the official forum spokesperson and your presumption that you are is very wrong NTV. Again, take your nose out of other people's business.




BLAHDEE BLADEEE BLAH BLAH
0

#16358 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted Yesterday, 02:14 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 30 April 2017 - 12:12 PM, said:

BLAHDEE BLADEEE BLAH BLAH






Posted Today, 01:12 PM

Battleaxe, on 30 April 2017 - 01:04 PM, said:



Alan, like everyone else at this forum, is quite capable of speaking for himself. You are not the official forum spokesperson and your presumption that you are is very wrong NTV. Again, take your nose out of other people's business.




BLAHDEE BLADEEE BLAH BLAH

0

#16359 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7113
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted Yesterday, 05:43 PM

View PostBattleaxe, on 30 April 2017 - 02:14 PM, said:

Posted Today, 01:12 PM

Battleaxe, on 30 April 2017 - 01:04 PM, said:


Alan, like everyone else at this forum, is quite capable of speaking for himself. You are not the official forum spokesperson and your presumption that you are is very wrong NTV. Again, take your nose out of other people's business.




BLAHDEE BLADEEE BLAH BLAH




This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, and his forum girlfriend Battleaxe, AKA Lianne Mylie.




He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun'.

Discouraged from turning up at court.He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

Over to you DOUGLAS.

PIPER.


He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."

It would appear that Wightman has a history of trolling and causing trouble. http://www.racecafe....an-here/&page=3


Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?




I don't argue against your position that members are free to use a moniker (nom de plume) and that you also respect their right to privacy, however, it is not fair or reasonable to think this with only certain members in this case ""Angryman" / "Brucey". So, while you jumped here to defend "Angryman's" / "Brucey's" right to privacy, you have remained silent on the right to privacy of Piper and myself. Why is this Alan? If the boot fits one foot it must surely fit the other foot?



Alan, you did take sides --- read your posting again please. I also ask that you point me to a posting where you have ever pointed out that Piper and I have a right to privacy too as obviously I missed that.

I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal. He was given the fair opportunity to respond but chose not to do so. As I have already commented, silence speaks volumes.

You are very different to other members, Alan, and if the truth be told this fourm has 'gone to hell in a handbasket' because of you and Lupine's cohort of "trolls" turning it into a battleground where innocent bystanders are being caught up in your fight for territory, power and control.

I bet that if you withdrew your membership from this forum then it would be returned to its former glory in a very short space of time.


_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.


Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.





(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.


DON'T FEED THE TROLL Colin Wightman.or his mate Rex, AKA Philip Bonner.


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#16360 User is offline   doppelganger 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1464
  • Joined: 19-September 03

Posted Yesterday, 10:31 PM

notice that most just post but at least Alan published ACC interpenetration of the legislation and one may want to read some dick heads opinion an how to make sure the injured are earning to the maximum and if not then being financial supported so they do not live in poverty. It is part of the human rights agreement signed by New Zealand in the later part of the 1940's.

Take note of the section of the regulations were the assessor can claim something else is stopping the injured from working.

Work Capacity Assessment Procedure


Quote

New Zealand Gazette

Departmental notes

Page 3600

Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation Act 1992

Development of a work capacity assessment procedure by the accident rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation.

New Zealand to section 50 of the Accident Rehabilitation Compensation Insurance Act 1992. ACC has developed a work capacity assessment procedure.

This procedure follows two rounds of public consultations.

The procedure will be used to assess the capacity for work of ACC clients who have completed a vocational rehabilitation plan and continue to receive weekly compensation. Clients who have been assessed as having a capacity for work will have their weekly compensation stopped within three months after the date of notification of the decision.

The procedure has two separate steps. The first step involves the client meeting with an occupational assessor, who will make an assessment of the persons skills. The occupational assessor will identify jobs the person is suitable for by considering the clients experience, education and training. The assessor will also consider new skills the person has acquired since the injury.

The client will then be examined by a medical assessor. Who will determine their ability to perform any of the jobs identified in the occupational assessment. If the medical assessor recommends to ACC that the client is able to work at any of the jobs for 30 or more hours per week, and that person will be deemed to have a capacity to work and weekly compensation will cease after three months.

If the medical assessor recommends further rehabilitation before a person is able to work in the job options identified, then weekly compensation will continue the client and the case manager will develop a new rehabilitation plan to carry out the assessor's recommendations. When this rehabilitation is completed, the client will be assessed again by the medical assessor.

The medical assessor could also recommend to ACC that a person is no longer prevented by their injury from working in any of the job options, but is unable to work because of a non-injury factor such as an illness. In these cases, weekly compensation will also be stopped after three months. A copy of the final version of the work capacity assessment procedure, with full estimations is available from any ACC officer or from the address below.

Work Capacity Assessment Procedure ACC CORPORATE Office PO Box 242 Wellington

0

Share this topic:


  • 818 Pages +
  • « First
  • 816
  • 817
  • 818
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users