ACCforum: Solvent Poisoning,and Occupational cancer, my story. - ACCforum

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Solvent Poisoning,and Occupational cancer, my story.

#21 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7113
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 05 May 2016 - 10:30 AM

I received conformation today that ACC are prepared to examine my claim, and that the claim is plausible due to the IARC research that has proven Trichloroethylene causes kidney cancer, and is present in car paint.
I have made contact with Dr Bill Glass, who has agreed to see me in his capacity as an Occupational Physician, and ACC have agreed to this, and will fund the costs.
Now the hard work begins, I now have to provide to Dr Glass a thorough and detailed work history going back to 1973.

For the benefit of the forum, in his letter John Monigatti The lead occupational health advisor for ACC also stated,

"Exposure to Arsenic, cadmium or printing processes have been classified as probable cause of renal cancer, based on limited evidence".
1

#22 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2647
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 06 August 2016 - 06:56 PM

That must be really frustrating 'Brucey'
0

#23 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2647
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 14 August 2016 - 10:18 AM

You appear as if you have nothing better to do than come and sit on the forum 24 hours a day and cause problems between members..

Is that the story of your life after being fried with chemical substances.?

I see you mentioned you're not able to get a natural erection.

View PostBrucey, on 04 August 2016 - 03:23 PM, said:

<SNIP>

Although the solvents have affected my erectile function, but thank god for Viagra.


I can understand why you use the moniker 'angryman'. ;)/>

Posted Image









0

#24 User is offline   Kewl 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 286
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 14 August 2016 - 12:47 PM

change focus. It is obvious the main stream medical arena wont treat the whole person, it is under the umbrella of psychologists and neuro psychiatrists.
thats until cancers set in then its toxic main stream medical " treatment".

a much better use of time is to research what alternative means there are to assist the body to strip the damaged cells and to promote the body to heal itself, then get as far away from acc as you can
as they are obviously toxic.
0

#25 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7113
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 14 August 2016 - 01:00 PM

View PostKewl, on 14 August 2016 - 12:47 PM, said:

change focus. It is obvious the main stream medical arena wont treat the whole person, it is under the umbrella of psychologists and neuro psychiatrists.
thats until cancers set in then its toxic main stream medical " treatment".

a much better use of time is to research what alternative means there are to assist the body to strip the damaged cells and to promote the body to heal itself, then get as far away from acc as you can
as they are obviously toxic.


True, but at the moment I suggest that we let everyone who comes in contact with these substances know of the dangers.

Back in my day we were very lax on safety. things are much better now, but I believe there should be a bold warning printed on paint containers.

Resene are now doing so voluntarily but I think it should be compulsory.

The message should be this product causes cancer. We do it on cigarette packaging.

0

#26 User is offline   Kewl 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 286
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 14 August 2016 - 01:02 PM

View PostBrucey, on 14 August 2016 - 01:00 PM, said:

True, but at the moment I suggest that we let everyone who comes in contact with these substances know of the dangers.

Back in my day we were very lax on safety. things are much better now, but I believe there should be a bold warning printed on paint containers.

Resene are now doing so voluntarily but I think it should be compulsory.

The message should be this product causes cancer. We do it on cigarette packaging.



ok try that, then quietly go around industries and ask the next generations what they know.........not a lot so all past efforts have amounted to
very little. Observe that despite warnings on product containers and (as is often the case) very small warning writing is not understood in the severity it should.
Also what about non-english speaking people not understanding the warning when they are focussed on getting their "job" done.

Focus on healing yourself first.
0

#27 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2647
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 14 August 2016 - 02:19 PM

Please stop talking about your private parts on the general public forums with 'not their victim',

It's not a discussion for you talking about how she will give you a bonner without both of you having to take meds :o/>


0

#28 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10724
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 14 August 2016 - 07:19 PM

You have an obsession now with men's privates Rex

As well as a mysogenist are you a homosexual?

You might need some viagra yourself Bonner
0

#29 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2647
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 17 August 2016 - 10:29 PM

View Postnot their victim, on 14 August 2016 - 07:19 PM, said:

You have an obsession now with men's privates Rex

As well as a mysogenist are you a homosexual?

You might need some viagra yourself Bonner


View PostBrucey, on 17 August 2016 - 10:24 AM, said:

I find Viagra very good for elevation.


This guy is sick ! It's all over the forum Posted Image
All he talks about is his limp ole fella, and you don't even know if I'm a 'male' you deluded twat
0

#30 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7113
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 17 August 2016 - 10:54 PM

And talking of limp dicks look who crashed the party.
As for your sex, I don't give a toss, you are exactly as you appear, a Filthy Troll.
2

#31 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7113
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 30 August 2016 - 08:57 AM

Due to the activity of Trolls, I have abandoned my contributions to this thread.
I am keeping a journal of my claim and my journey with ACC as regards that claim, and will publish all my information on to a reputable forum at a later date.
It is a shame that ones willingness to help others is ridiculed by a few vulgar trolls.
2

#32 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2647
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 30 August 2016 - 08:32 PM

View PostBrucey, on 30 August 2016 - 08:57 AM, said:

Due to the activity of Trolls, I have abandoned my contributions to this thread.
I am keeping a journal of my claim and my journey with ACC as regards that claim, and will publish all my information on to a reputable forum at a later date.
It is a shame that ones willingness to help others is ridiculed by a few vulgar trolls.


I guess you didn't fit in here as we don't care about what Viagra does for you.

Go and tell your specialists old man...

Those comments you made in the other thread about looking for a victim to put your Viagra to "use"., was disgusting and not suitable for this site

You're a creepy old man :o/>



0

#33 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7113
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 31 August 2016 - 07:31 AM

He who pays the piper has a little sidekick called dickchick rex.

Alan seems to like what piper and the dick chick write

The dick chick needs to be included in the trolling message

This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by the individual who refers to himself as He who pays the Piper, And his dickchick rex

This Troll likes to throw around accusations so the people feel they have to justify themselves to him.

This is standard Troll practice.

No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity.

The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist.

New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

#34 User is offline   REX 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2647
  • Joined: 16-July 09

Posted 31 August 2016 - 10:40 PM

['Not their victim'] writes lots of nasty things about people, as shown in her recent court case and just goes to show she is a NUTTER.

['Not their victim'] 's most recent court decision to stay BLUDGING off the ACC scheme states; (Relevant facts)

[4] By way of preliminary issue, Mr Beck and Mr McBride agreed that all annotations on documents made by ['Not their victim'] should be removed from the evidence as filed. Counsel agreed that documents in the bundle for hearing would be replaced with an agreed bundle – Volume 2, which was received following the hearing on 22 December 2014. I have considered these documents in the appeal.:o/>:wacko:/>

[14] The Corporation referred Ms ['Not their victim'] to Dr Fenwicke for a VIMA in January 2008. She found Ms ['Not their victim'] fit for light sedentary work. Dr Fenwicke recorded Ms ['Not their victim'] commenced work on a part time basis building up to a 35 hour week. Dr Fenwicke noted Ms ['Not their victim'] had made some clinical improvement since the assessment in 2006. No other treatment, apart from being monitored by her GP, was recommended by Dr Fenwicke.

(That was 10 years ago !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

[15] Following Dr Fenwicke’s report, the Corporation determined Ms ['Not their victim'] was vocationally independent on 2 September 2008. That decision was quashed at review on 13 February 2009. :rolleyes:/> = BLUDGING

[16] On 5 August 2009 Dr Kanji, Musculoskeletal Pain Specialist noted that Ms ['Not their victim'] hit her forehead against a steel bar in January 2009. As a result, Ms ['Not their victim'] experienced difficulties with memory, headaches, neck and thoracic pain. Dr Kanji considered the headaches were likely to be linked to pain from the facet joints due to the fusion and disc changes. He prescribed pain medication for chronic pain.

[48] ['Not their victim'] underwent a Vocational Independence Occupational Assessment (VIOA) undertaken by Mr Roux who identified 19 job types that would match ['Not their victim']'s skills, experience and training, and for which there were no vocational barriers.

[67] The VIMA was then undertaken by Dr Christian on 2 February 2011. Dr Christian concluded 15 jobs were suitable for ['Not their victim'] for 30 hours or more per week.

These are truly only part of her team of physicians to get her brain working well enough to get her back to being a productive member of society however she has got so use to bludging she gets headaches,,. when she hears the word "WORK",

Dr Walsh, Psychiatrist

Dr Hudson,

Dr Hunn, Neurosurgeon

Dr Baker, Neurologist

All I can conclude/summarise with is,, get a job NTV and stop the HARD mind-set of being a BLUDGER !
0

#35 User is offline   not their victim 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10724
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 01 September 2016 - 11:20 AM

worth noting that researchers who’ve studied cyberbullying distinguish between two kinds of online harassers:
trolls, who pursue their victim for sadistic pleasure,

and cyberstalkers, who go after a person out of pathological anger toward the victim.

The latter are potentially far more dangerous, according to the experts.

REX THREATENS TO BASH WOMEN

and

HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER IS A SADISTIC PSYCHOPATH BY HIS OWN WRITINGS...

HE HAS GREAT PLEASURE IS ATTEMPTING TO TAUNT RAPE VICTIMS,
THE HEAD INJURED,
WOMEN AND ALL
INJURED PERSONS

Alan Thomas supports this behaviour as suits his agenda..

And no he will not get a Royal Preogative of Pardon....




THE FORUM IS OFFICIALLY MUNTED DUE TO THE

MISADMINISTRATION OF THIS SITE



STATES IN THE RULES...

ONE MUST COOPERATE WITH THE AUTHORITIES..

LET'S GET THE TRUTH ESTABLISHED

THIS DEN OF INIQUITY NEEDS CLOSING DOWN



DUE TO ONGOING TROLLING OF A PERSON WHO IS NOT EVEN ON CLAIM

SO THERE MUST BE A GOOD REASON FOR THAT!

COULD IT BE HE HAS SCABBED ACC BEFORE?


FROM THE RAGE WITHIN THE ENDLESS POSTINGS OF HOW BAD THE CORPORATION IS

AND THE THREATS OF TAKING FERTILIZER TO PARLIAMENT. .




YES PIPER WROTE THAT...




This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by the individual who refers to himself as He who pays the Piper.

This Troll likes to throw around accusations so the people feel they have to justify themselves to him.

This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line.

He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity.

The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist.


New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll and his Psycophantic Cohorts
0

#36 User is offline   Battleaxe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6055
  • Joined: 30-August 06

Posted 04 January 2017 - 03:29 PM

View PostREX, on 30 August 2016 - 08:32 PM, said:

I guess you didn't fit in here as we don't care about what Viagra does for you.

Go and tell your specialists old man...

Those comments you made in the other thread about looking for a victim to put your Viagra to "use"., was disgusting and not suitable for this site

You're a creepy old man Posted Image/>







Good for Rex standing up to the "creepy old man" who calls himself "Brucey" and who has an unhealthy obsession with private parts and Viagra.
0

#37 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6770
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 04 January 2017 - 04:28 PM

View PostBrucey, on 16 April 2016 - 04:29 PM, said:

Mid 1972 I left school and began work as an apprentice automotive spray painter.
The company I began working for was typical of those at that time in small town New Zealand, Three panel beaters two painters, in a back alley industrial part of town. The paint shop was a small low ceiling four car shed, with a 24 inch extraction fan in the ceiling. And a spray booth large enough to just accommodate one car, with a larger fan at the far end.

It was the practice of the company at that time to do all rubbing down wet with mineral turpentine, initial preparation and between coats. No gloves were worn, I can remember my hands being covered in turps for hours at a time, almost every day. I can recall my hands tingling and the skin being very dry, cracking open to produce exposed wounds, and the tips of the fingers being worn down and bleeding because of the sandpaper wearing them down.

The spray booth was used for enamel repaints mainly, due to the need for a dust free environment, Most of the nitrocellulose lacquer and the acrylic lacquer was applied in the workshop, or outdoors if it was fine. I can remember working in a haze most of the time, and wearing only a dust mask, or nothing at all. I can recall feeling intoxicated or high on fumes, and recall one time where I actually passed out.

Two years into my apprenticeship the tradesman who was in charge of me dropped dead in the end of the spray booth, I was never told the cause of death. I remember he was in his fifties and not of good health. I remember him saying to me once,
"what did you choose this job for, you never see old car painters".

It was in my fourth year I was introduced to two pot isocyanate based paint in the form of a Lusteroid product called Acrythane. I was required to paint new Taskmaster forklifts with this product, off site at the factory that built them, in a small shed with no fan and only a dust mask for protection. There was a door at each end of the building that were opened to create an airflow, I recall working in a haze, and a bitter taste in my mouth. I remember having many headaches and feeling poorly at times. Gloves were never worn, and any paint on the hands was washed off using lacquer thinner, repeatedly through the day.

This was all par for the course back in the day, and when I look back it was atrocious working conditions we were subjected to, with workers being very ignorant of the health risks, it was an environment where production and a fast turnover was paramount.

I have been in the industry off and on since then, spending about twenty two years in all in the trade. I have worked in some very good establishments, and I have worked in some very bad ones.
Over the years there have been vast improvements in employer attitudes and safety in the workplace, the dodgey paint shops of old that I spent a lot of time in, are all but gone now.
We have spray bake ovens, and prep stations with down draft extrusion, air fed breathing apparatus, vacuum sanding technology, ventilated mixing rooms, and everyone is required to wear gloves, and eye protection.

But the one message I have never heard is that SOLVENTS CAUSE CANCER.

Boxing day 2014 I was involved in a serious car v motor cycle accident, I was admitted to Christchurch Hospital with extensive injuries. As a matter of course I was given a full body CT scan, as well as my orthopaedic injuries they found a 7cm mass in the upper pole of my right kidney. It was found to be a Renal Cell Carcinoma, and my kidney was removed.
That was fourteen months ago.
Had the tumour not been found when it was, I would have died.

Over the past eight years I have been presenting to my GPs with symptoms relating to solvent exposure, but to date none of the medical people involved in my health care have ever made the connection. Even when I was diagnosed with cancer, no one made the link.
By chance a couple of weeks ago I heard a discussion on the radio with a man called Tony Gibson, who lost his son to Occupational Cancer, his son Jason was a painter. Since then I have been in touch with Tony, his wife Annette, and Jasons wife Sonia, who have been very helpful and supportive towards me.
Sonia has agreed to assist me bring a claim against ACC for Occupational cancer.

http://gloveup.co.nz/

I have decided to document my case going forward, and tell my story so that others might benefit from it. Maybe there are others out there in the same position as me, who are not well and don't understand why, maybe there are some that have past away.

If all the medical people in my life over the last year failed to make the link between my exposure to solvents and other carcinogens, and my cancer. Then clearly the message needs to get out there, and that message is,

SOLVENTS CAUSE CANCER.



Perhaps we could step aside from the argy-bargy of Internet etiquette and get back to the core subject matter.

You seem to have an accepted claim in relation to your high risk preinjury work task activity relied upon for your earnings.

You speak of a two part urethane based material known as Acrythane.
A clear colourless Aliphatic Polyisocyanate resin solution used as the hardener component for High Solids Acrythane.

As isocyanate is known to cause a DNA change it is of course quite capable of causing cancer. Obviously the solvents don't cause cancer but will certainly make you more susceptible as the medical journals have described. The solvents combined with isocyanate mean that the isocyanate may ride in on the solvent in much the same way as when someone drinks a lot of alcohol all manner of different other chemistry will ride in on the alcohol whereby there is a multiplying effect.

Solvents are on their own certainly do create a supersensitive type situation however I can understand the difficulty the medical profession will have trying to make a direct link between solvents and cancer.You say that you have been presenting to various medical professionals as if there is a relationship between the solvents and cancer but you have not acted describe what they connection is. You say that despite being diagnosed as cancer no one has made the link will stop of course I've got to ask why. Why?

Could you please describe the actual connection so as others may benefit from your posting in the manner that is most desirable within this forum which will obviously not only help others that may be suffering the same way as you but you might find that others may find out information that could be shared with you as well so as there is a mutual help situation, the purpose of the site.

You indicate that a Advocates well known to the site has agreed to take on your case but despite that you have not yet indicated any kind of connection from which the legislation would permit the ACC to accept the claim. If the medical profession does not make the connection, how are you expecting the ACC to make the connection as the ACC are not permitted to accept the claim and less there is a medical connection confirmed by a New Zealand registered doctor?

It may be helpful for you to know that I do have an accepted claim for cover in relation to both isocyanates and a variety of other solvents that are commonly used in relation to these types of products. my case may be a little it more obvious than yours in as much as the Isocyanate was not in a deluded paint form and when cleaning very powerful solvents were used when cleaning out the second biggest machine in New Zealand in much the same conditions as the very worst that you had worked in. I would very much like to know which particular solvent you are concerned about that is known to be carcinogenic. For example acetone is quite often used but even our own human bodies produce acetone and as such acetone is not likely to be carcinogenic. Most alcohols likewise are not likely to be responsible for cancer as likewise alcohol is naturally occurring within our own bodies. There are not many solvents that are capable of addressing these two pipe isocyanate-based painting systems. For example you may have been using methylene chloride which of course would have a huge multiplying effect of the isocyanate as far as the effect on your body with the isocyanate being the responsible ingredient that causes cancer.


So in summary have you got a medical professional in New Zealand to write a medical report or claim that establishes a direct relationship between a named solvent and your cancer? How is the Dr Glass connection going, any progress there?
0

#38 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7113
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 04 January 2017 - 09:39 PM

View PostAlan Thomas, on 04 January 2017 - 04:28 PM, said:

Perhaps we could step aside from the argy-bargy of Internet etiquette and get back to the core subject matter.

You seem to have an accepted claim in relation to your high risk preinjury work task activity relied upon for your earnings.

You speak of a two part urethane based material known as Acrythane.
A clear colourless Aliphatic Polyisocyanate resin solution used as the hardener component for High Solids Acrythane.

As isocyanate is known to cause a DNA change it is of course quite capable of causing cancer. Obviously the solvents don't cause cancer but will certainly make you more susceptible as the medical journals have described. The solvents combined with isocyanate mean that the isocyanate may ride in on the solvent in much the same way as when someone drinks a lot of alcohol all manner of different other chemistry will ride in on the alcohol whereby there is a multiplying effect.

Solvents are on their own certainly do create a supersensitive type situation however I can understand the difficulty the medical profession will have trying to make a direct link between solvents and cancer.You say that you have been presenting to various medical professionals as if there is a relationship between the solvents and cancer but you have not acted describe what they connection is. You say that despite being diagnosed as cancer no one has made the link will stop of course I've got to ask why. Why?

Could you please describe the actual connection so as others may benefit from your posting in the manner that is most desirable within this forum which will obviously not only help others that may be suffering the same way as you but you might find that others may find out information that could be shared with you as well so as there is a mutual help situation, the purpose of the site.

You indicate that a Advocates well known to the site has agreed to take on your case but despite that you have not yet indicated any kind of connection from which the legislation would permit the ACC to accept the claim. If the medical profession does not make the connection, how are you expecting the ACC to make the connection as the ACC are not permitted to accept the claim and less there is a medical connection confirmed by a New Zealand registered doctor?

It may be helpful for you to know that I do have an accepted claim for cover in relation to both isocyanates and a variety of other solvents that are commonly used in relation to these types of products. my case may be a little it more obvious than yours in as much as the Isocyanate was not in a deluded paint form and when cleaning very powerful solvents were used when cleaning out the second biggest machine in New Zealand in much the same conditions as the very worst that you had worked in. I would very much like to know which particular solvent you are concerned about that is known to be carcinogenic. For example acetone is quite often used but even our own human bodies produce acetone and as such acetone is not likely to be carcinogenic. Most alcohols likewise are not likely to be responsible for cancer as likewise alcohol is naturally occurring within our own bodies. There are not many solvents that are capable of addressing these two pipe isocyanate-based painting systems. For example you may have been using methylene chloride which of course would have a huge multiplying effect of the isocyanate as far as the effect on your body with the isocyanate being the responsible ingredient that causes cancer.


So in summary have you got a medical professional in New Zealand to write a medical report or claim that establishes a direct relationship between a named solvent and your cancer? How is the Dr Glass connection going, any progress there?






I am no longer interested in detailing my claim on this troll ridden website, my claim for chronic solvent neurotoxicity, and renal cancer from trichloroethylene exposure is progressing well.




0

#39 User is offline   Alan Thomas 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6770
  • Joined: 10-June 06

Posted 04 January 2017 - 10:41 PM

View PostBrucey, on 04 January 2017 - 09:39 PM, said:

I am no longer interested in detailing my claim on this troll ridden website, my claim for chronic solvent neurotoxicity, and renal cancer from trichloroethylene exposure is progressing well.






The expertise of my medical advisers Which may be extended to yourself in relation to the same chemistry still stands should you choose to benefit from the relationship between facts and entitlement
0

#40 User is offline   Brucey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7113
  • Joined: 26-January 07
  • LocationEarth

Posted 16 March 2017 - 01:06 PM

This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, and his forum friend Battleaxe.

My self and others have in our possession reports from Netsafe detailing "serious, extensive, and repeated" breaches of the Harmful Digital communications Act by He Who Pays The Piper, AKA Colin Wightman, after having made complaints against him.





He who pays the piper, AKA Colin Wightman, made the following threats against a man called Douglas Weal, falsely believing me to be that person.

He who pays the piper said:



posting # 230562

... when I suggested the possibility of some very kind friends of mine dropping into see him in CROMWELL to give him some healthy advice.

Even more funny, I'm still waiting for the call from down there.

p.s. And no DOUGLAS, one of my mates trains Alsatian dogs, for the Police, so don't rely on that


Posting # =230434

...

They will take you to the outskirts of CROMWELL and give you two choices.


Posting # 230425


Get yourself a new name because I have a lot of friends in the CROMWELL area who, like me, hate scum-bags.


Posting # 230362


I can't wait to catch up with you in CROMWELL to see what sort of scum bag life you live.

I'll drop in at the local first to see if they can give me directions.




Posting # 231625

For those who haven't noticed, ever since "Brucey" was flushed out as to who he actually is, he not only went into defense mode against denying that he is DOUGLAS WEAL who ALAN THOMAS tells us is very dangerous, but has chosen not to make my upcoming visit to him in CROMWELL as welcome, suggesting that I will need to come well armed.

PIPER.

He who pays the piper, on 19 January 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:If DOUGLAS WEAL is not the person who has been stalking me on this FORUM [2000 postings on attack] then my meeting with him will not take long, except that I want to hear his version of the ALAN THOMAS "frame-up" before I leave this lovely town of CROMWELL on my way further south.




He who pays the piper, on 21 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

The only enemies he has are the fruitcakes that framed ALAN THOMAS.

He handed over the evidence of a death threat from DOUGLAS WEAL [Donald Duck with bullet holes around him] which showed that TOMCAT & ANGRYMAN were working with ACC to bring false charges against ALAN THOMAS as DAVID BUTLER knew the truth.

A "double crosser" who was under the 'gun, discouraged from turning up a court.




He who pays the piper, on 04 January 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Just when I thought that at least 80% of contributors to ACC forum sites were fruitcakes, fraudsters and freaks, I kindly received today damning evidence that there is an almost conclusive chance that TOMCATS mate DOUGLAS WEAL is none other than our simpleton BRUCEY [Former: Angryman] who has spent the last 33 years trying to upgrade himself to ACC so that he can grow even fatter and lazier in his latest hiding place down there in CROMWELL.

For those less familiar, this is the bloke that ALAN THOMAS tells us master-minded the bomb plot frame-up against him and gave evidence to that effect as a CROWN WITNESS in the District Court.

Before I close the book on this little saga I would like to give this half-wit calling himself BRUCEY an opportunity to defend himself of this identity connection.

Rather than repeating himself for the last 1500 posts [the work of a total fruitcake] I will be so kind as to give him the chance to defend himself.

( In other words if I tell him my real name, he will stop telling lies about me).



He who pays the piper, on 16 March 2017 - 09:52 AM, said:

And not long to work out that "BRUCEYs" associate here in IRENE has trouble with her lift going to the top.

But even funnier when the JUDGE finds out that one of them has a 23 year history with ACC [multiple & variable claims], while the other one has a 33 year history with his hand out.

Not forgetting their leader of course who specialises in double dipping ACC.

And driving buses through loopholes in ACC.

Using the mentally ill card.







He also had the following comments to make about my daughter who is a rape victim.



" Is your daughter a simpleton like you Brucey?

Brucey do you mind me asking please what does Lupine charge for a duped claim of “toxicity” and one for “promiscuity”?

Good to see simpleton Brucey coming up with something original. To think he bred his own kind. A downgrading of the human race.

I’m guessing Brucey is playing the “mentally ill” card [genetic related] while his daughter [a product of the old man] is playing the “sensitive claim” card. A family of scabbers.

While Brucey of course is on a “family deal”.

I’m sure they are looking after you. 10 years on the scab and growing. As for the “family deal” the apple never falls far from the “tree”.
And dear old simpleton Bruce with a daughter who is apparently as simple as him."




Battleaxe is on record as supporting piper in his attacks on me and has stated the following.



"Silence speaks louder than words, Piper. I think that the above posting speaks volumes and that Douglas Weal is indeed "Brucey" previously "Angryman".

Perhaps Alan Thomas can fill in the gaps?


"I did not speculate about who "Brucey" is. Piper did, but that said, I agree with his view that "Angryman" / "Brucey" is Douglas Weal".



"By the way, Douglas Weal aka "Angryman" aka "Brucey" does not need to pretend he is "stupid" as I for one consider him to be very stupid. Just read any one of his posts to see the level of intellect you're dealing with here".


Battle axe has also on two occasions stated that I have twice in my postings incited people to commit suicide.

She has not provided any proof of this vile and serious accusation.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





Angryman was my previous moniker, and does not belong to Douglas Weal.

I have never been involved in any way shape or form in any threats or in the bringing of false charges against anyone.



I have never been diagnosed with a mental illness, I have only been on ACC for two years following a serious MC accident.

I have worked and paid ACC levies for over fourty years.






Because I think you are a very dangerous individual Colin Wightman and I believe Douglas Weal could very well be in danger I am telling you that My name is not Douglas Weal.

My name is Bruce, my friends call me Brucey, but you can call me sir.

I have let you rabbit on for long enough, time to show the forum what a complete fool and a danger to society you are.







(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) the person posts a digital communication with the intention that it cause harm to a victim; and
/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> posting the communication would cause harm to an ordinary reasonable person in the position of the victim; and
© posting the communication causes harm to the victim.

(2) In determining whether a post would cause harm, the court may take into account any factors it considers relevant, including—
(a) the extremity of the language used:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> the age and characteristics of the victim:
© whether the digital communication was anonymous:
(d) whether the digital communication was repeated:
(e) the extent of circulation of the digital communication:
(f) whether the digital communication is true or false:
(g) the context in which the digital communication appeared..

(3) A person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction to,—
(a) in the case of a natural person, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $50,000:
(/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/>/> in the case of a body corporate, a fine not exceeding $200,000.
(4) In this section, victim means the individual who is the target of a posted digital communication.

Despite Colin Wightman having a Netsafe report against him detailing repeated and serious breaches of the HDCA, he persists on a daily basis with his attacks on myself and others, assisted by his trolling mate Battleaxe.





DON'T FEED THE TROLL Colin Wightman. or his trolling partner Battleaxe.


This Forum is currently being subjected to Trolling by an individual who refers to himself as He who pays the piper, real name Colin Wightman. This Troll likes to throw around accusations so that people feel they have to justify themselves to him. This is standard Troll practice. No one owes this Troll any sort of explanation and anyone who engages with this Troll thus is simply making the Troll feel relevant.

This Troll likes to target women and Sensitive Claimants especially though the Troll will attack and abuse anyone who dares to fail to follow his line. He has made comments that could be seen as inciting criminal activity. The Troll likes to think he has some special secret process where he can make ACC accountable but this boasting is the actions of a Fantasist. New members are encouraged to avoid engagement with this Troll.
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users